Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that \(f_{1}, f_{2}, \ldots\), and \(f\) are in \(L_{\text {loc }}^{1}(U) .\) The conditions in (a) and (b) below imply that \(f_{n} \rightarrow f\) in \(\mathcal{D}^{\prime}(U)\), but the condition in (c) does not. a. \(f_{n} \in L^{P}(U)(1 \leq p \leq \infty)\) and \(f_{n} \rightarrow f\) in the \(L^{P}\) norm or weakly in \(L^{P}\). b. For all \(n,\left|f_{n}\right| \leq g\) for some \(g \in L_{\text {loe }}^{1}(U)\), and \(f_{n} \rightarrow f\) a.e. c. \(f_{n} \rightarrow f\) pointwise.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Conditions (a) and (b) imply convergence in \(\mathcal{D}'(U)\); condition (c) does not.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Spaces

The given functions \(f_1, f_2, \ldots, f\) are in \(L_{\text{loc}}^1(U)\), meaning they are locally integrable over domain \(U\). This is a space of functions where each function is integrable over any compact subset of \(U\).
02

Understand Convergence in \(\mathcal{D}'(U)\)

\(f_n \rightarrow f\) in \(\mathcal{D}'(U)\) means that for every test function \(\phi\) in the space of smooth compactly supported functions \(\mathcal{D}(U)\), we have \(\int_U f_n \phi \to \int_U f \phi\). This implies the convergence of functionals defined by \(f_n\) to the functional defined by \(f\).
03

Analyze Condition (a)

Condition (a) states that \(f_n \in L^p(U)\) and \(f_n \rightarrow f\) in the \(L^p\) norm or weakly in \(L^p\). Convergence in the \(L^p\) norm implies \(\lVert f_n - f \rVert_p \rightarrow 0\), and weak convergence implies convergence of \(\int_U f_n \psi \rightarrow \int_U f \psi\) for all bounded and measurable \(\psi\). Both forms of convergence are strong enough to assert convergence in \(\mathcal{D}'(U)\).
04

Analyze Condition (b)

In condition (b), \(|f_n| \leq g\) for some \(g \in L_{\text{loc}}^1(U)\) and \(f_n \rightarrow f\) a.e. on \(U\). This indicates pointwise convergence almost everywhere, coupled with a dominating function \(g\). Dominated Convergence Theorem justifies concluding \(f_n \rightarrow f\) in \(\mathcal{D}'(U)\).
05

Analyze Condition (c)

Condition (c) states \(f_n \rightarrow f\) pointwise. Pointwise convergence alone does not generally imply convergence in \(\mathcal{D}'(U)\) because it's potentially too weak; no assurance of integrability constraints or uniformity—necessary for test function convergence—is given.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Convergence in Distribution
Convergence in distribution is a fundamental concept in real analysis, particularly when dealing with sequences or sets of random variables. It often appears in the context of probability theory but is relevant in the analysis of functions as well. Understanding this form of convergence is crucial when you cannot ensure stronger types of convergence, such as almost sure or pointwise convergence.

In practice, convergence in distribution means that the distribution of the random variables converges to the distribution of another random variable as the sequence progresses. It's essential for those working with inferential statistics and hypothesis testing, as it allows the use of limiting techniques even if precise convergent conditions are not fully met. This type of convergence is weaker than pointwise or uniform convergence, since the modes of convergence that guarantee limits in terms of collective behavior may not need to apply to individual elements.

The strength of convergence in distribution lies in its versatility, enabling the analysis of sequences even when other conditions, such as compact support or bounded variation, aren't available. This gives statisticians and mathematicians a powerful tool for dealing with real-world data, where ideal conditions rarely exist.
Locally Integrable Functions
Locally integrable functions form an essential class within the space of measurable functions. A function is locally integrable on a domain if it can be integrated over every compact subset of that domain. This flexibility makes such functions integral to real analysis, particularly in understanding partial functions that may not extend globally.

Imagine you have a function that might behave well in small areas but has trouble over the whole domain. Locally integrable functions allow mathematicians to work with these tricky cases, covering each compact subset to ensure everything behaves as expected. Their usage is widespread in solving differential equations and in the study of distributions, where the focus is often more on local behavior than the global picture.

In real-world applications, locally integrable functions make it feasible to work with datasets or phenomena that show variation over different scales and areas. By switching the focus on local segments, these functions encapsulate an approach where the constraints of whole-domain properties, like boundedness or uniform continuity, are traded for integrability in smaller domains.
Dominated Convergence Theorem
The Dominated Convergence Theorem provides a valuable bridge between pointwise convergence and integration. It states that if you have a sequence of functions that converge almost everywhere to a target function and are dominated by an integrable function, then you can interchange limits and integrations. This theorem is essential when dealing with the integral limits of functions within the real analysis.

A sequence of functions that satisfies the conditions of this theorem must be coverable by a single, integrable "dominating" function. Once this condition is met, the convergence of the integrals follows. This is immensely useful for mathematicians who frequently work with series and limits. It ensures that if every function in the sequence is adequately controlled by the dominating function, then even informal intuited sequences can fit within the rigorous framework required for integration.

In real-world mathematical problems, the Dominated Convergence Theorem simplifies analysis by reducing complex limiting processes to a problem of finding the dominating function. It connects the dots between local behavior and integrals, ensuring that mathematical rigor is upheld even when individual sequences may not independently converge by themselves.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(F\) be a distribution on \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\) such that \(\operatorname{supp}(F)=\\{0\\}\). a. There exist \(N \in \mathbb{N}, C>0\) such that for all \(\phi \in C_{e}^{\infty}\). $$ |\langle F, \phi\rangle| \leq C \sum_{|a| \leq N} \sup _{|x| \leq 1}\left|\partial^{\alpha} \phi(x)\right| $$ b. Fix \(\psi \in C_{e}^{\infty}\) with \(\psi(x)=1\) for \(|x| \leq 1\) and \(\psi(x)=0\) for \(|x| \geq 2\). If \(\phi \in C_{e}^{\infty}\), let \(\phi_{k}(x)=\phi(x)[1-\psi(k x)]\). If \(\partial^{\alpha} \phi(0)=0\) for \(|\alpha| \leq N\), then \(\partial^{\alpha} \phi_{k} \rightarrow \partial^{\alpha} \phi\) uniformly as \(k \rightarrow \infty\) for \(|\alpha| \leq N\). (Hint: By 'Taylor's theorem. \(\left|\partial^{\alpha} \phi(x)\right| \leq C|x|^{N+1-|\alpha|}\) for \(\left.|\alpha| \leq N_{.}\right)\) c. If \(\phi \in C_{c}^{\infty}\) and \(\partial^{\alpha} \phi(0)=0\) for \(|\alpha| \leq N\), then \(\langle F, \phi\rangle=0\). d. There exist constants \(c_{\alpha}(|\alpha| \leq N)\) such that \(F=\sum_{|a| \leq N} c_{\alpha} \partial^{\alpha} \delta\).

Let \(f\) be a continuous function on \(\mathbb{R}^{n} \backslash\\{0\\}\) that is homogeneous of degree \(-n\) (i.e., \(\left.f(r x)=r^{-n} f(x)\right)\) and has mean zero on the unit sphere (i.e., \(\int f d \sigma=0\) where \(\sigma\) is surface measure on the sphere). Then \(f\) is not locally integrable near the origin (unless \(f=0)\), but the formula $$ \langle P V(f), \phi\rangle=\lim _{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \int_{|x|>\epsilon} f(x) \phi(x) d x \quad\left(\phi \in C_{c}^{\infty}\right) $$ defines a distribution \(P V(f)-" P V "\) stands for "principal value" - that agrees with \(f\) on \(\mathbb{R}^{n} \backslash\\{0\\}\) and is homogeneous of degree \(-n\) in the sense of Exercise 9 .

Suppose that \(U\) and \(V\) are open in \(R^{n}\) and \(\Phi: V \rightarrow U\) is a \(C^{\infty}\) diffeomorphism. Explain how to define \(F \circ \Phi \in \mathcal{D}^{\prime}(U)\) for any \(F \in \mathcal{D}^{\prime}(V)\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free