Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(0^{\prime}\) denote a point that is is not an element of \((-1,1)\), and let \(X=(-1,1) \cup\) \(\left\\{0^{\prime}\right\\}\). Let \(\mathcal{T}\) be the topology on \(X\) generated by the sets \((-1, a),(a, 1),[(-1, b) \backslash\) \(\\{0\\}] \cup\left\\{0^{\prime}\right\\}\), and \([(c, 1) \backslash\\{0\\}] \cup\left\\{0^{\prime}\right\\}\) where \(-1

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Both \(f\) and \(g\) are homeomorphisms onto their ranges. b. \(X\) is \(T_1\) but not Hausdorff. c. Given sets are compact but not closed, and their intersection isn't compact.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Topology on X

The topology \( \mathcal{T} \) on \( X = (-1, 1) \cup \{0'\} \) includes open intervals and sets that exclude 0 but include \(0'\). It's important to see how \(0'\) is used to split \((-1,1)\) at 0, creating unique open sets around \(0'\).
02

Define Functions f and g

Define \( f : (-1,1) \rightarrow X \) by \( f(x) = x \) for all \( x \), making it the identity function on \((-1,1)\). Define \( g : (-1,1) \rightarrow X \) by \( g(x) = x \) for \( x eq 0 \) and \( g(0) = 0' \), mapping 0 to \(0'\). Both functions map points in \((-1,1)\) to their respective counterparts in \(X\).
03

Check Homeomorphisms for f and g

To show \( f \) is a homeomorphism, note it's bijective and continuous with the identity map's properties maintained in both \(X\) and the standard topology on \((-1,1)\). For \( g \), note that it switches 0 with \(0'\), and preserves continuity and bijection via the topology \(\mathcal{T}\) on \(X\), showing \( g \) is also a homeomorphism.
04

Analyze X's T1 but Non-Hausdorff Nature

In \(X\), any point except for 0 and 0' can be separated from others by open sets, showing it's \(T_1\). However, there are no disjoint open sets that can separate 0 and 0', which shows \(X\) is not Hausdorff.
05

Investigate Compactness and Closure of Sets

The set \([-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}]\) is compact in the usual topology on \((-1,1)\). The set \(\left([-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}] \backslash \{0\}\right) \cup \{0'\}\) is likewise compact under \(\mathcal{T}\) because \( \{0'\} \) behaves like \(0\) in terms of closure in compact sets. Both sets, however, are not closed in \(X\) under \(\mathcal{T}\) due to the neighborhood behavior of 0 and \(0'\). Their intersection lacks compactness, as the usual closure defining compactness isn't satisfied within \(X\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Homeomorphism
In topology, a homeomorphism is a function that captures the concept of an "equivalent" shape or space. To be a homeomorphism, a function must be:
  • Bijective: One-to-one and onto. Every element has a unique partner in the target set.
  • Continuous: Small changes in input lead to small changes in output.
  • Inverse Continuous: The reverse map is also continuous.
For the functions discussed in the exercise, like function \( f(x) = x \) for all \( x \) in \((-1, 1)\), it matches points directly between \((-1, 1)\) and set \( X \). This makes it a clear homeomorphism because it meets all three criteria above. Additionally, \( g(x) \) differs by mapping 0 to \( 0' \), but still maintains these conditions under the topology \( \mathcal{T} \). This means both \( f \) and \( g \) effectively preserve the topological structure of their domains, verifying their homeomorphic nature.
Hausdorff space
A Hausdorff space is a type of topological space where any two points can be separated by neighborhoods. This separation means there exist disjoint open sets around each point.In the presented problem, the space \( X \) is described as being \( T_1 \), meaning each point is closed by itself. Despite this, \( X \) is not a Hausdorff space because there are no disjoint open sets that separate the point at 0 from the point \( 0' \). This means even though they behave separately, they can't be distinctly "closed off" from each other in the topology \( \mathcal{T} \) on \( X \). Thus, while each point of \( X \) may have homeomorphic neighborhoods that pretend to act like a standard Hausdorff space, the whole space \( X \) does not satisfy the full Hausdorff requirement.
Compactness
Compactness can be thought of as a generalization of finiteness in a topological space. A set is compact if every open cover has a finite subcover. This means that we can cover the entire space using a few of these open sets.In the problem, we explored compactness within the sets \([-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}]\) and \(([-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}] \setminus \{0\}) \cup \{0'\}\). Both of these are compact within their respective topologies, however, they are not closed in the topology \( \mathcal{T} \) on \( X \). Interestingly, when these compact sets intersect, they lose compactness because the intersection does not behave like a standard compact set in \( X \). This shows the delicate balance required to maintain compactness and closure in different topological structures.
Topology on sets
The topology \( \mathcal{T} \) on a set determines the types of open sets that can exist. These open sets define how we understand concepts like continuity, limits, and compactness in a space.In the exercise, the topology \( \mathcal{T} \) on set \( X = (-1, 1) \cup \{0'\} \) is crafted using intervals that strategically exclude or include the point \( 0' \). This particular topology breaks typical intuitions by allowing \( 0' \) to create a unique structure around what is normally an interval \((-1, 1)\). By interpreting the topology \( \mathcal{T} \), one can see how classic properties like open sets and continuity adapt in this context. The topology \( \mathcal{T} \) helps to illustrate how small changes in set definitions can significantly impact the properties of those sets within a topological framework.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If \(A\) is a directed set, a subset \(B\) of \(A\) is called cofinal in \(A\) if for each \(\alpha \in A\) there exists \(\beta \in B\) such that \(\beta \gtrsim \alpha\). a. If \(B\) is cofinal in \(A\) and \(\left\langle x_{\alpha}\right\rangle_{\alpha \in A}\) is a net, the inclusion map \(B \rightarrow A\) makes \(\left\langle x_{\beta}\right\rangle_{\beta \in B}\) a subnet of \(\left\langle x_{\alpha}\right\rangle_{\alpha \in A}\). b. If \(\left\langle x_{\alpha}\right\rangle_{\alpha} \in A\) is a net in a topological space, then \(\left\langle x_{\alpha}\right\rangle\) converges to \(x\) iff for every cofinal \(B \subset A\) there is a cofinal \(C \subset B\) such that \(\left\langle x_{\gamma}\right\rangle_{\gamma \in C}\) converges to \(x\).

If \(X\) is a topological space, \(A \subset X\) is closed, and \(g \in C(A)\) satisfies \(g=0\) on \(\partial A\), then the extension of \(g\) to \(X\) defined by \(g(x)=0\) for \(x \in A^{c}\) is continuous.

If \(X\) is a linearly ordered set, the topology \(\mathcal{T}\) generated by the sets \(\\{x: xa\\}(a \in X)\) is called the order topology. a. If \(a, b \in X\) and \(a

If \(X\) and \(Y\) are topological spaces, \(\phi \in C(X, Y)\) is called proper if \(\phi^{-1}(K)\) is compact in \(X\) for every compact \(K \subset Y\). Suppose that \(X\) and \(Y\) are LCH spaces and \(X^{*}\) and \(Y^{*}\) are their one-point compactifications. If \(\phi \in C(X, Y)\), then \(\phi\) is proper iff \(\phi\) extends continuously to a map from \(X^{*}\) to \(Y^{*}\) by setting \(\phi(\infty, X)=\infty_{Y}\).

Let \(1-\sum_{1}^{\infty} c_{n} t^{n}\) be the Maclaurin series for \((1-t)^{1 / 2}\). a. The series converges absolutely and uniformly on compact subsets of \((-1,1)\), as does the termwise differentiated series \(-\sum_{1}^{\infty} n c_{n} t^{n-1}\). Thus, if \(f(t)=\) \(1-\sum_{1}^{\infty} c_{n} t^{n}\), then \(f^{\prime}(t)=-\sum_{1}^{\infty} n c_{n} t^{n-1}\). b. By explicit calculation, \(f(t)=-2(1-t) f^{\prime}(t)\). from which it follows that \((1-t)^{-1 / 2} f(t)\) is constant. Since \(f(0)=1, f(t)=(1-t)^{1 / 2}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free