Chapter 1: Problem 10
Given a measure space \((X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)\) and \(E \in \mathcal{M}\), define \(\mu_{E}(\mathcal{A})=\mu(A \cap E)\) for \(A \in \mathcal{M}\). Then \(\mu_{E}\) is a measure.
Short Answer
Expert verified
\(\mu_E\) is a measure since it satisfies all measure properties.
Step by step solution
01
Understand the Measure Definition
A measure is a function \( \mu : \mathcal{M} \to [0, \infty] \) that satisfies three properties: non-negativity, null empty set, and \(\sigma\)-additivity.
02
Check Non-Negativity
For any \( A \in \mathcal{M} \), \( \mu_E(A) = \mu(A \cap E) \geq 0 \) since \( \mu \) is non-negative and measures intersections as subsets of measurable sets.
03
Verify the Null Empty Set Property
Consider \( A = \emptyset \). Then \( A \cap E = \emptyset \), and thus \( \mu_E(\emptyset) = \mu(\emptyset \cap E) = \mu(\emptyset) = 0 \). This satisfies the property for measures.
04
Establish \(\sigma\)-additivity
Take a countable collection \( \{A_i\}_{i=1}^{\infty} \subseteq \mathcal{M} \). We have \( \mu_E\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} A_i\right) = \mu\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} (A_i \cap E)\right) \). Since \(\mu\) is \(\sigma\)-additive, \( \mu\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} (A_i \cap E)\right) = \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \mu(A_i \cap E) \), hence \( \mu_E\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} A_i\right) = \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \mu_E(A_i) \).
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Non-Negativity
In measure theory, one of the foundational properties of a measure is non-negativity. This means that for any measurable set \( A \), the measure \( \mu(A) \) must be greater than or equal to zero. This makes sense because a measure can be thought of as assigning a size or volume to sets, and it's logical that size can't be negative.
When checking non-negativity for our specific measure \( \mu_E \), defined as \( \mu_E(A) = \mu(A \cap E) \), we need to consider the intersection \( A \cap E \).
Since \( \mu \) is already a non-negative measure, the intersection \( A \cap E \) as a subset is also measured in a non-negative way:
Understanding this is crucial because it ensures all measurements are logically consistent; you cannot have a negative size in a system measuring size or probability.
When checking non-negativity for our specific measure \( \mu_E \), defined as \( \mu_E(A) = \mu(A \cap E) \), we need to consider the intersection \( A \cap E \).
Since \( \mu \) is already a non-negative measure, the intersection \( A \cap E \) as a subset is also measured in a non-negative way:
- For any \( A \in \mathcal{M} \), \( \mu_E(A) = \mu(A \cap E) \geq 0 \).
Understanding this is crucial because it ensures all measurements are logically consistent; you cannot have a negative size in a system measuring size or probability.
Null Empty Set
The null empty set property is another important attribute of a measure. This property essentially states that the measure of an empty set is always zero.
\(\mu(\emptyset) = 0 \) signifies that there's nothing to measure, hence it cannot possess any volume or size.
When we look at \( \mu_E \), the measure is slightly adapted but retains this fundamental property.
Consider:
Grasping this concept helps underline that non-existent elements in a set don't mistakenly contribute to the total measure, maintaining both theoretical and practical precision.
\(\mu(\emptyset) = 0 \) signifies that there's nothing to measure, hence it cannot possess any volume or size.
When we look at \( \mu_E \), the measure is slightly adapted but retains this fundamental property.
Consider:
- The measure \( \mu_E(\emptyset) = \mu(\emptyset \cap E) \).
- Since \( \emptyset \cap E = \emptyset \), then \( \mu_E(\emptyset) = \mu(\emptyset) = 0 \).
Grasping this concept helps underline that non-existent elements in a set don't mistakenly contribute to the total measure, maintaining both theoretical and practical precision.
Sigma-additivity
Sigma-additivity (or \( \sigma \)-additivity) is the property that ensures the measure can handle countable unions of sets in a consistent manner.
This is an essential trait as it ensures that a measure can combine over an infinite count of sets while retaining reliability and accuracy.
To verify \( \sigma \)-additivity for \( \mu_E \), consider a countable collection of sets \( \{A_i\}_{i=1}^{\infty} \):
By doing so, we ensure our measure remains reliable whether dealing with simple or complex and infinite set arrangements.
This is an essential trait as it ensures that a measure can combine over an infinite count of sets while retaining reliability and accuracy.
To verify \( \sigma \)-additivity for \( \mu_E \), consider a countable collection of sets \( \{A_i\}_{i=1}^{\infty} \):
- With \( \mu_E \), we define: \( \mu_E\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} A_i\right) = \mu\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} (A_i \cap E)\right) \).
- Because the original measure \( \mu \) is \( \sigma \)-additive, it applies: \( \mu\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} (A_i \cap E)\right) = \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \mu(A_i \cap E) \).
- Thus, \( \mu_E \) follows that \( \mu_E\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} A_i\right) = \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \mu_E(A_i) \).
By doing so, we ensure our measure remains reliable whether dealing with simple or complex and infinite set arrangements.