Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

At time \({\rm{t = 0, 20}}\) identical components are tested. The lifetime distribution of each is exponential with parameter \({\rm{\lambda }}\). The experimenter then leaves the test facility unmonitored. On his return \({\rm{24}}\) hours later, the experimenter immediately terminates the test after noticing that \({\rm{y = 15}}\) of the \({\rm{20}}\) components are still in operation (so \({\rm{5}}\) have failed). Derive the mle of \({\rm{\lambda }}\). (Hint: Let \({\rm{Y = }}\) the number that survive \({\rm{24}}\) hours. Then \({\rm{Y}} \sim {\rm{Bin(n,p)}}\). What is the mle of \({\rm{p}}\)? Now notice that \({\rm{p = P(}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{i}}} \ge {\rm{24)}}\), where \({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{i}}}\) is exponentially distributed. This relates \({\rm{\lambda }}\) to \({\rm{p}}\), so the former can be estimated once the latter has been.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The values are \({\rm{\hat \lambda = - }}\frac{{{\rm{ln}}\frac{{\rm{Y}}}{{\rm{n}}}}}{{{\rm{24}}}}\) and \({\rm{\hat \lambda = 0}}{\rm{.012}}\).

Step by step solution

01

Define exponential function

A function that increases or decays at a rate proportional to its present value is called an exponential function.

02

Explanation

X is a random variable that can be used with pdf,

\({{\rm{f}}_{\rm{X}}}{\rm{(x) = }}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{{\rm{\lambda }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda x}}}}}&{{\rm{,x}} \ge {\rm{0}}}\\{\rm{0}}&{{\rm{,x < 0}}}\end{array}} \right.\)

With parameter\({\rm{\lambda }}\), it is said to have an exponential distribution.

With parameters n and p, the random variable Y has a Binomial distribution. Because of this,

\({\rm{p = P}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{i}}} \ge {\rm{24}}} \right)\)

The probability value must be approximated, as stated in the clue - keep in mind that the parameter\({\rm{\lambda }}\)is unknown!

The maximum likelihood estimator of the Binomial distribution's parameter p is,

\({\rm{\hat p = }}\frac{{\rm{Y}}}{{\rm{n}}}\)

Let the maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters \(\widehat {{{\rm{\theta }}_{\rm{i}}}}{\rm{,i = 1,2,}}.....{\rm{,n}}\) be, \(\widehat {{{\rm{\theta }}_{\rm{i}}}}{\rm{,i = 1,2,}}.....{\rm{,n}}\). The function of the mle's \(\widehat {{{\rm{\theta }}_{\rm{i}}}}\). is the mle of any function of parameters \({{\rm{\theta }}_{\rm{i}}}\).

03

Evaluating the maximum likelihood estimators

The maximum likelihood estimator of parameter\({\rm{\lambda }}\)will thus be a function of the maximum likelihood estimator\(\widehat {\rm{p}}\), according to the invariance principle.

The\(\widehat {\rm{p}}\)function can be deduced from,

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{p = P(X}} \ge {\rm{24)}}\\{\rm{ = 1 - P(X < 24)}}\\{\rm{ = 1 - }}\int_{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{24}}} {\rm{\lambda }} {{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda x}}}}{\rm{dx}}\\{\rm{ = 1 - }}\left. {{\rm{\lambda }}\frac{{{\rm{ - 1}}}}{{\rm{\lambda }}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda x}}}}} \right|_{\rm{0}}^{{\rm{24}}}\\{\rm{ = 1 + }}\left( {{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 24\lambda }}}}{\rm{ - 1}}} \right)\\{\rm{ = }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 24\lambda }}}}\end{array}\)

As a result,\({\rm{\lambda }}\)maximum likelihood estimator is,

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 24\hat \lambda }}}}{\rm{ = \hat p}}\\{\rm{ - 24\hat \lambda = ln}}\frac{{\rm{Y}}}{{\rm{n}}}\end{array}\)

Last but not least, the estimator can be expressed as,

\({\rm{\hat \lambda = - }}\frac{{{\rm{ln}}\frac{{\rm{Y}}}{{\rm{n}}}}}{{{\rm{24}}}}\)

For\({\rm{n = 20}}\)and\({\rm{y = 15}}\), the maximum probability estimate is as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{\hat \lambda = - }}\frac{{{\rm{ln}}\frac{{\rm{Y}}}{{\rm{n}}}}}{{{\rm{24}}}}\\{\rm{ = - }}\frac{{{\rm{ln}}\frac{{{\rm{15}}}}{{{\rm{20}}}}}}{{{\rm{24}}}}\\{\rm{ = 0}}{\rm{.012}}\end{array}\)

Therefore, \({\rm{\hat \lambda = - }}\frac{{{\rm{ln}}\frac{{\rm{Y}}}{{\rm{n}}}}}{{{\rm{24}}}}\) and \({\rm{\hat \lambda = 0}}{\rm{.012}}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

a. A random sample of 10 houses in a particular area, each of which is heated with natural gas, is selected and the amount of gas (therms) used during the month of January is determined for each house. The resulting observations are 103, 156, 118, 89, 125, 147, 122, 109, 138, 99. Let m denote the average gas usage during January by all houses in this area. Compute a point estimate of m. b. Suppose there are 10,000 houses in this area that use natural gas for heating. Let t denote the total amount of gas used by all of these houses during January. Estimate t using the data of part (a). What estimator did you use in computing your estimate? c. Use the data in part (a) to estimate p, the proportion of all houses that used at least 100 therms. d. Give a point estimate of the population median usage (the middle value in the population of all houses) based on the sample of part (a). What estimator did you use?

An estimator \({\rm{\hat \theta }}\) is said to be consistent if for any \( \in {\rm{ > 0}}\), \({\rm{P(|\hat \theta - \theta |}} \ge \in {\rm{)}} \to {\rm{0}}\) as \({\rm{n}} \to \infty \). That is, \({\rm{\hat \theta }}\) is consistent if, as the sample size gets larger, it is less and less likely that \({\rm{\hat \theta }}\) will be further than \( \in \) from the true value of \({\rm{\theta }}\). Show that \({\rm{\bar X}}\) is a consistent estimator of \({\rm{\mu }}\) when \({{\rm{\sigma }}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ < }}\infty \) , by using Chebyshevโ€™s inequality from Exercise \({\rm{44}}\) of Chapter \({\rm{3}}\). (Hint: The inequality can be rewritten in the form \({\rm{P}}\left( {\left| {{\rm{Y - }}{{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{Y}}}} \right| \ge \in } \right) \le {\rm{\sigma }}_{\rm{Y}}^{\rm{2}}{\rm{/}} \in \). Now identify \({\rm{Y}}\) with \({\rm{\bar X}}\).)

Urinary angiotensinogen (AGT) level is one quantitative indicator of kidney function. The article โ€œUrinary Angiotensinogen as a Potential Biomarker of Chronic Kidney Diseasesโ€ (J. of the Amer. Society of Hypertension, \({\rm{2008: 349 - 354}}\)) describes a study in which urinary AGT level \({\rm{(\mu g)}}\) was determined for a sample of adults with chronic kidney disease. Here is representative data (consistent with summary quantities and descriptions in the cited article):

An appropriate probability plot supports the use of the lognormal distribution (see Section \({\rm{4}}{\rm{.5}}\)) as a reasonable model for urinary AGT level (this is what the investigators did).

a. Estimate the parameters of the distribution. (Hint: Rem ember that \({\rm{X}}\) has a lognormal distribution with parameters \({\rm{\mu }}\) and \({{\rm{\sigma }}^{\rm{2}}}\) if \({\rm{ln(X)}}\) is normally distributed with mean \({\rm{\mu }}\) and variance \({{\rm{\sigma }}^{\rm{2}}}\).)

b. Use the estimates of part (a) to calculate an estimate of the expected value of AGT level. (Hint: What is \({\rm{E(X)}}\)?)

A vehicle with a particular defect in its emission control system is taken to a succession of randomly selected mechanics until\({\rm{r = 3}}\)of them have correctly diagnosed the problem. Suppose that this requires diagnoses by\({\rm{20}}\)different mechanics (so there were\({\rm{17}}\)incorrect diagnoses). Let\({\rm{p = P}}\)(correct diagnosis), so\({\rm{p}}\)is the proportion of all mechanics who would correctly diagnose the problem. What is the mle of\({\rm{p}}\)? Is it the same as the mle if a random sample of\({\rm{20}}\)mechanics results in\({\rm{3}}\)correct diagnoses? Explain. How does the mle compare to the estimate resulting from the use of the unbiased estimator?

A diagnostic test for a certain disease is applied to\({\rm{n}}\)individuals known to not have the disease. Let\({\rm{X = }}\)the number among the\({\rm{n}}\)test results that are positive (indicating presence of the disease, so\({\rm{X}}\)is the number of false positives) and\({\rm{p = }}\)the probability that a disease-free individual's test result is positive (i.e.,\({\rm{p}}\)is the true proportion of test results from disease-free individuals that are positive). Assume that only\({\rm{X}}\)is available rather than the actual sequence of test results.

a. Derive the maximum likelihood estimator of\({\rm{p}}\). If\({\rm{n = 20}}\)and\({\rm{x = 3}}\), what is the estimate?

b. Is the estimator of part (a) unbiased?

c. If\({\rm{n = 20}}\)and\({\rm{x = 3}}\), what is the mle of the probability\({{\rm{(1 - p)}}^{\rm{5}}}\)that none of the next five tests done on disease-free individuals are positive?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free