Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

We defined a negative binomial\({\rm{rv}}\)as the number of failures that occur before the\({\rm{rth}}\)success in a sequence of independent and identical success/failure trials. The probability mass function (\({\rm{pmf}}\)) of\({\rm{X}}\)is\({\rm{nb(x,r,p) = }}\)\(\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{\rm{x + r - 1}}}\\{\rm{x}}\end{array}} \right){{\rm{p}}^{\rm{r}}}{{\rm{(1 - p)}}^{\rm{x}}}\quad {\rm{x = 0,1,2, \ldots }}\)

a. Suppose that. Show that\({\rm{\hat p = (r - 1)/(X + r - 1)}}\)is an unbiased estimator for\({\rm{p}}\). (Hint: Write out\({\rm{E(\hat p)}}\)and cancel\({\rm{x + r - 1}}\)inside the sum.)

b. A reporter wishing to interview five individuals who support a certain candidate begins asking people whether\({\rm{(S)}}\)or not\({\rm{(F)}}\)they support the candidate. If the sequence of responses is SFFSFFFSSS, estimate\({\rm{p = }}\)the true proportion who support the candidate.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) Total probability of a valid probability distribution is equal to \({\rm{1}}{\rm{.}}\)\({\rm{E(\hat p) = p}}\)

b) The estimate is \({\rm{\hat p = 0}}{\rm{.4444}}\)the true proportion.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

An estimator is a rule for computing an estimate of a given quantity based on observable data: the rule (estimator), the quantity of interest (estimate), and the output (estimate) are all distinct.

02

Explanation

(a)

Given: The pmf of \({\rm{X}}\)is:

\({\rm{nb(x;r,p) = }}\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{\rm{x + r - 1}}}\\{\rm{x}}\end{array}} \right){{\rm{p}}^{\rm{r}}}{{\rm{(1 - p)}}^{\rm{x}}}\)

The expected value of \({\rm{\hat p}}\)is the sum of the product of each possible value of \(\frac{{{\rm{r - 1}}}}{{{\rm{X + r - 1}}}}\) with its probability\({\rm{nb(x;r,p)}}\):

\(\begin{aligned}E(\hat p) &= \sum\limits_{x = 0}^{ + \infty } {\frac{{r - 1}}{{x + r - 1}}} nb(x;r,p)\\ &= \sum\limits_{x = 0}^{ + \infty } {\frac{{r - 1}}{{x + r - 1}}} \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{x + r - 1}\\x\end{array}} \right){p^r}{(1 - p)^x}\\ &= \sum\limits_{x = 0}^{ + \infty } {\frac{{r - 1}}{{x + r - 1}}} \frac{{(x + r - 1)!}}{{x!(x + r - 1 - x)!}}{p^r}{(1 - p)^x}\\ &= \sum\limits_{x = 0}^{ + \infty } {(r - 1)} \frac{{(x + r - 2)!}}{{x!(r - 1)!}}{p^r}{(1 - p)^x}\\ &= \sum\limits_{x = 0}^{ + \infty } {\frac{{(x + r - 2)!}}{{x!(r - 2)!}}} {p^r}{(1 - p)^x}\\ &= \sum\limits_{x = 0}^{ + \infty } {\frac{{(x + r - 2)!}}{{x!((x + r - 2) - x)!}}} {p^r}{(1 - p)^x}\\ &= \sum\limits_{x = 0}^{ + \infty } {\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{x + r - 2}\\x\end{array}} \right)} {p^r}{(1 - p)^x}\\ &= p\sum\limits_{x = 0}^{ + \infty } {\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{x + r - 2}\\x\end{array}} \right)} \\ &= p{(1 - p)^x}\end{aligned}\)

Note:

\(\sum\limits_{x = 0}^{ + \infty } {\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{x + r - 2}\\x\end{array}} \right)} {p^{r - 1}}{(1 - p)^x}\)\(\sum\limits_{{\rm{x = 0}}}^{{\rm{ + \yen}}} {\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{\rm{x + r - 2}}}\\{\rm{x}}\end{array}} \right)} {{\rm{p}}^{{\rm{r - 1}}}}{{\rm{(1 - p)}}^{\rm{x}}}\)which is the negative binomial distribution with the \({\rm{(r - 1)}}\)th success (instead of \({\rm{r}}\)th success) and thus total probability of a valid probability distribution is equal to \({\rm{1}}{\rm{.}}\)

03

Explanation

(b)

Considering the given information:

\({\rm{r = 5}}\)

SFFSFFFSSS

SFFSFFFSSS contains \({\rm{5}}\) successes and \({\rm{5}}\) failures. \({\rm{x}}\)is the number of failures.

\({\rm{x = 5}}\)

Determine the estimator of part (a):

\(\begin{aligned}\hat p &= \frac{{{\rm{r - 1}}}}{{{\rm{x + r - 1}}}}\\ &= \frac{{{\rm{5 - 1}}}}{{{\rm{5 + 5 - 1}}}}\\ &= \frac{{\rm{4}}}{{\rm{9}}}\\{\rm{\gg 0}}{\rm{.4444}}\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the solution is\({\rm{\hat p = 0}}{\rm{.4444}}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let\({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{,}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{, \ldots ,}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{n}}}\)be a random sample from a pdf\({\rm{f(x)}}\)that is symmetric about\({\rm{\mu }}\), so that\({\rm{\backslash widetildeX}}\)is an unbiased estimator of\({\rm{\mu }}\). If\({\rm{n}}\)is large, it can be shown that\({\rm{V (\tilde X)\gg 1/}}\left( {{\rm{4n(f(\mu )}}{{\rm{)}}^{\rm{2}}}} \right)\).

a. Compare\({\rm{V(\backslash widetildeX)}}\)to\({\rm{V(\bar X)}}\)when the underlying distribution is normal.

b. When the underlying pdf is Cauchy (see Example 6.7),\({\rm{V(\bar X) = \yen}}\), so\({\rm{\bar X}}\)is a terrible estimator. What is\({\rm{V(\tilde X)}}\)in this case when\({\rm{n}}\)is large?

An investigator wishes to estimate the proportion of students at a certain university who have violated the honor code. Having obtained a random sample of\({\rm{n}}\)students, she realizes that asking each, "Have you violated the honor code?" will probably result in some untruthful responses. Consider the following scheme, called a randomized response technique. The investigator makes up a deck of\({\rm{100}}\)cards, of which\({\rm{50}}\)are of type I and\({\rm{50}}\)are of type II.

Type I: Have you violated the honor code (yes or no)?

Type II: Is the last digit of your telephone number a\({\rm{0 , 1 , or 2}}\)(yes or no)?

Each student in the random sample is asked to mix the deck, draw a card, and answer the resulting question truthfully. Because of the irrelevant question on type II cards, a yes response no longer stigmatizes the respondent, so we assume that responses are truthful. Let\({\rm{p}}\)denote the proportion of honor-code violators (i.e., the probability of a randomly selected student being a violator), and let\({\rm{\lambda = P}}\)(yes response). Then\({\rm{\lambda }}\)and\({\rm{p}}\)are related by\({\rm{\lambda = }}{\rm{.5p + (}}{\rm{.5)(}}{\rm{.3)}}\).

a. Let\({\rm{Y}}\)denote the number of yes responses, so\({\rm{Y\sim}}\)Bin\({\rm{(n,\lambda )}}\). Thus Y / n is an unbiased estimator of\({\rm{\lambda }}\). Derive an estimator for\({\rm{p}}\)based on\({\rm{Y}}\). If\({\rm{n = 80}}\)and\({\rm{y = 20}}\), what is your estimate? (Hint: Solve\({\rm{\lambda = }}{\rm{.5p + }}{\rm{.15}}\)for\({\rm{p}}\)and then substitute\({\rm{Y/n}}\)for\({\rm{\lambda }}\).)

b. Use the fact that\({\rm{E(Y/n) = \lambda }}\)to show that your estimator\({\rm{\hat p}}\)is unbiased.

c. If there were\({\rm{70}}\)type I and\({\rm{30}}\)type II cards, what would be your estimator for\({\rm{p}}\)?

Let\({\rm{X}}\)denote the proportion of allotted time that a randomly selected student spends working on a certain aptitude test. Suppose the pdf of\({\rm{X}}\)is

\({\rm{f(x;\theta ) = }}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{\rm{(\theta + 1)}}{{\rm{x}}^{\rm{\theta }}}}&{{\rm{0£ x£ 1}}}\\{\rm{0}}&{{\rm{ otherwise }}}\end{array}} \right.\)

where\({\rm{ - 1 < \theta }}\). A random sample of ten students yields data\({{\rm{x}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.92,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.79,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.90,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{4}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.65,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{5}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.86}}\),\({{\rm{x}}_{\rm{6}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.47,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{7}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.73,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{8}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.97,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{9}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.94,}}{{\rm{x}}_{{\rm{10}}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.77}}\).

a. Use the method of moments to obtain an estimator of\({\rm{\theta }}\), and then compute the estimate for this data.

b. Obtain the maximum likelihood estimator of\({\rm{\theta }}\), and then compute the estimate for the given data.

a. A random sample of 10 houses in a particular area, each of which is heated with natural gas, is selected and the amount of gas (therms) used during the month of January is determined for each house. The resulting observations are 103, 156, 118, 89, 125, 147, 122, 109, 138, 99. Let m denote the average gas usage during January by all houses in this area. Compute a point estimate of m. b. Suppose there are 10,000 houses in this area that use natural gas for heating. Let t denote the total amount of gas used by all of these houses during January. Estimate t using the data of part (a). What estimator did you use in computing your estimate? c. Use the data in part (a) to estimate p, the proportion of all houses that used at least 100 therms. d. Give a point estimate of the population median usage (the middle value in the population of all houses) based on the sample of part (a). What estimator did you use?

A vehicle with a particular defect in its emission control system is taken to a succession of randomly selected mechanics until\({\rm{r = 3}}\)of them have correctly diagnosed the problem. Suppose that this requires diagnoses by\({\rm{20}}\)different mechanics (so there were\({\rm{17}}\)incorrect diagnoses). Let\({\rm{p = P}}\)(correct diagnosis), so\({\rm{p}}\)is the proportion of all mechanics who would correctly diagnose the problem. What is the mle of\({\rm{p}}\)? Is it the same as the mle if a random sample of\({\rm{20}}\)mechanics results in\({\rm{3}}\)correct diagnoses? Explain. How does the mle compare to the estimate resulting from the use of the unbiased estimator?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free