Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Two airplanes are flying in the same direction in adjacent parallel corridors. At time \({\rm{t = 10}}\), the first airplane is \({\rm{10}}\)km ahead of the second one. Suppose the speed of the first plane (km/hr.) is normally distributed with mean \({\rm{520\;}}\)and standard deviation \({\rm{10}}\) and the second plane’s speed is also normally distributed with mean and standard deviation \({\rm{500\; and\; 10}}\), respectively.

a. What is the probability that after \({\rm{2hr}}{\rm{. }}\)of flying, the second plane has not caught up to the first plane?

b. Determine the probability that the planes are separated by at most \({\rm{10km\; after\; 2hr}}{\rm{. }}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

a\({\rm{P}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ < 5}}} \right){\rm{ = 0}}{\rm{.9616;}}\)

b. \({\rm{P}}\left( {{\rm{0£ }}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{£ 10}}} \right){\rm{ = 0}}{\rm{.0623}}\)

Step by step solution

01

definition of standard deviation

The square root of the variance is the standard deviation of a random variable, sample, statistical population, data collection, or probability distribution. It is less resilient in practice than the average absolute deviation, but it is algebraically easier.

02

Determining the probability that after \({\rm{2hr}}{\rm{. }}\)of flying, the second plane has not caught up to the first plane

Let \({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}\)be the speed of the first plane with a mean of \({\rm{250}}\) and a standard deviation of \({\rm{10}}\), and \({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}\) be the speed of the second plane with a mean of \({\rm{500}}\) and a standard deviation of\({\rm{10}}\)

The first plane is approximately\({\rm{10}}\) kilometers ahead of the second plane.

(a) The lengths travelled by the planes are \({\rm{2}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}\)and \({\rm{2}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}\),respectively, implying that the event of the second plane not catching up to the first plane may be represented with

\(\mathop {\mathop {{\rm{2}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ + 10}}}\limits_{\rm{n}} }\limits_{{\rm{distance passed/first plane\;}}} {\rm{ > }}\mathop {\mathop {{\rm{2}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}}\limits_{\rm{n}} }\limits_{{\rm{distance passed/second plane\;}}} \)

Obviously, the second plane had not caught up to the first plane because it had travelled a shorter distance.

Rewrite this as a linear combination of random variables \({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{,}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}\) as follows:

\({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ < 5}}{\rm{.}}\)

To calculate the probability of the occurrence in question, first normalize the random variable \({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}\)

\({\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}} \right){\rm{ = E}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}} \right){\rm{ - E}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}} \right){\rm{ = 500 - 520 = - 20}}\)

The variance is

\({\rm{V}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}} \right){\rm{ = V}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}} \right){\rm{ + ( - 1}}{{\rm{)}}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{V}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}} \right){\rm{ = 100 + 100 = 200}}\)

Because the random variables are independent, the mean values are true

The standard deviation of the data is

\({\rm{\sigma = }}\sqrt {{\rm{200}}} {\rm{ = 14}}{\rm{.14}}{\rm{.}}\)

Therefore, following is true

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{\rm{P}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ < 5}}} \right){\rm{ = P}}\left( {\frac{{{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ - ( - 20)}}}}{{{\rm{14}}{\rm{.14}}}}{\rm{ < }}\frac{{{\rm{5 - ( - 20)}}}}{{{\rm{14}}{\rm{.14}}}}} \right)}\\{{\rm{ = P(Z < 1}}{\rm{.77) = 0}}{\rm{.9616}}}\end{array}\)

03

Determining the probability that the planes are separated by at most \({\rm{10km\; after\; 2hr}}{\rm{. }}\) 

(b) After \({\rm{2}}\) hours, the distance travelled by the first plane will be

\({\rm{10 + 2}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}\)

and the distance travelled by the second plane after \({\rm{2}}\) hours will be

\({\rm{2}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}\)

A random variable can be used to indicate the separation distance (the distance difference)

\(\left| {{\rm{2}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - 10 - 2}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}} \right|{\rm{.\;}}\)

As a result, the chance of an event is the probability that the planes are apart by at most \({\rm{10}}\)kilometer’s after\({\rm{2}}\)hours

\(\left| {{\rm{2}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - 10 - 2}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}} \right|{\rm{£ 10}}\)

or, alternatively,

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{r}}{{\rm{ - 10£ 2}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - 10 - 2}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{£ 10}}}\\{{\rm{0£ }}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{£ 10}}}\end{array}\)

Finally, as in (a), the following is true:

\begin{aligned}P\left( {0£{X_2} - {X_1}£10} \right) &= P\left( {\frac{{0 - ( - 20)}}{{14.14}}£\frac{{{X_2} - {X_1} - ( - 20)}}{{14.14}} < \frac{{5 - ( - 20)}}{{14.14}}} \right) \\ &= P(1.41£Z£2.21) = P(Z£2.21) - P(Z£1.41) \\ &= 0.9830 - 0.9207 = 0.0623 \\ \end{aligned}

(1): from the appendix's normal probability table. Software can also be used to calculate the likelihood.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the strength data for beams given in Example

1.2.

a. Construct a stem-and-leaf display of the data. What appears to be a representative strength value? Do the observations appear to be highly

concentrated about the representative value or rather spread out?

b. Does the display appear to be reasonably symmetric about a representative value, or would you describe its shape in some other way?

c. Do there appear to be any outlying strength values?

d. What proportion of strength observations in this sample exceeds 10 MPa?

Fire load (MJ/m2) is the heat energy that could bereleased per square meter of floor area by combustionof contents and the structure itself. The article “FireLoads in Office Buildings” (J. of Structural Engr.,

1997: 365–368) gave the following cumulative percentages(read from a graph) for fire loads in a sample of388 rooms:

Value0 150 300 450 600

Cumulative %0 19.3 37.6 62.7 77.5

Value750 900 1050 1200 1350

Cumulative %87.2 93.8 95.7 98.6 99.1

Value1500 1650 1800 1950

Cumulative %99.5 99.6 99.8 100.0

a. Construct a relative frequency histogram and commenton interesting features.

b. What proportion of fire loads are less than 600? At least 1200?

c. What proportion of the loads are between 600 and1200?

Consider the following sample of observations on coating thickness for low-viscosity paint ("Achieving a Target Value for a Manufacturing Process: \({\rm{A}}\)Case Study, \({\rm{97}}\)J. of Quality Technology, \({\rm{1992:22 - 26}}\)):

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{r}}{{\rm{.83}}}&{{\rm{.88}}}&{{\rm{.88}}}&{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.04}}}&{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.09}}}&{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.12}}}&{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.29}}}&{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.31}}}\\{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.48}}}&{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.49}}}&{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.59}}}&{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.62}}}&{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.65}}}&{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.71}}}&{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.76}}}&{{\rm{1}}{\rm{.83}}}\end{array}\)

Assume that the distribution of counting thickness is normal (a normal probability plot strongly supports this assumption).

a. Calculate a point estimate of the mean value of coating thickness, and state which estimator you used.

b. Calculate a point estimate of the median of the coating thickness distribution, and state which estimator you used.

C. Calculate a point estimate of the value that separates the largest of\({\rm{10\% }}\) all values in the thickness distribution from the remaining \({\rm{90\% }}\)and state which estimator you used. (Hint Express what you are trying to estimate in terms of \({\rm{\mu }}\)and \({\rm{\sigma }}\)

d. Estimate \({\rm{P}}\left( {{\rm{X < 1}}{\rm{.5}}} \right){\rm{,}}\)i.e., the proportion of all thickness values less than 1.5. (Hint: If you knew the values of \({\rm{\mu }}\)and \({\rm{\sigma }}\), you could calculate this probability. These values are not available, but they can be estimated.)

e. What is the estimated standard error of the estimator that you used in part (b)?

In a famous experiment carried out in 1882, Michelson,and Newcomb obtained 66 observations on the time it took for light to travel between two locations in Washington, D.C. A few of the measurements(coded in a certain manner) were 31, 23, 32, 36, 22, 26, 27, and 31.

a. Why are these measurements not identical?

b. Is this an enumerative study? Why or why not?

Zinfandel is a popular red wine varietal produced almostexclusively in California. It is rather controversialamong wine connoisseurs because its alcohol contentvaries quite substantially from one producer to another.In May 2013, the author went to the website klwines.com, randomly selected 10 zinfandels from among the 325 available, and obtained the following values of alcoholcontent (%):

14.8 14.5 16.1 14.2 15.9

13.7 16.2 14.6 13.8 15.0

  1. Calculate and interpret several measures of center.
  2. Calculate the sample variance using the defining formula.
  3. Calculate the sample variance using the short cut formula after subtracting 13 from each observation
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free