Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \({X_L},....,{X_m}\)be a random sample from a Poisson distribution with parameter\({\mu _1}\), and let \({Y_1},....,{Y_n}\)be a random sample from another Poisson distribution with parameter\({\mu _2}\). We wish to test \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\) against one of the three standard alternatives. When m and n are large, the large-sample z test of Section 9.1 can be used. However, the fact that \(V(\bar X) = \mu /n\) suggests that a different denominator should be used in standardizing\(\bar X - \bar Y\). Develop a large sample test procedure appropriate to this problem, and then apply it to the following data to test whether the plant densities for a particular species are equal in two different regions (where each observation is the number of plants found in a randomly located square sampling quadrate having area\(1\;{m^2}\), so for region 1 there were 40 quadrates in which one plant was observed, etc.):

Short Answer

Expert verified

Reject null hypothesis

Step by step solution

01

Step 1: To obtain a large sample test procedure

Proposition: For a random variable X with Poisson distribution with parameter\(\mu > 0\), the following is true

\(E(X) = V(X) = \mu \)

As mentioned,

\(V(\bar X) = \frac{\mu }{n}\)

The standard deviation for\(\bar X - \bar Y\)can be computed as

\(\begin{array}{l}{\sigma _{\bar X - \bar Y}} = \sqrt {V(\bar X - \bar Y)} = \sqrt {V(\bar X) + V(\bar Y)} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{{\mu _1}}}{m} + \frac{{{\mu _2}}}{n}} .\end{array}\)

To form a test statistic, the standard deviation needs to be estimated. First estimate\({\mu _1}\)and\({\mu _2}\), as usual, with

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\hat \mu }_1} = \bar X\\{{\hat \mu }_2} = \bar Y.\end{array}\)

This yields test statistic with standard normal distribution (for large m and n)

\(Z = \frac{{\bar X - \bar Y}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{{\hat \mu }_1}}}{m} + \frac{{{{\hat \mu }_2}}}{n}} }}\)

The accompanying table summarize the data to perform this test.

02

Step 2: Final proof

The sample mean for the number of plants in the region 1 is

\(\bar x = {\hat \lambda _1} = \frac{1}{{125}} \cdot (0 + 40 + 56 + \ldots + 7) = 1.616\)

and for the region is

\(\bar y = {\hat \lambda _2} = \frac{1}{{140}} \cdot (0 + 25 + 60 + \ldots + 7) = 2.557\)

The z statistic value is

\(z = \frac{{1.611 - 2.557}}{{\sqrt {1.616/125 + 2.557/140} }} = - 5.3\)

Depending on the alternative hypothesis the P value would differ. The alternative hypothesis of interest is\({H_a}:{\mu _1} \ne {\mu _2}\); thus the P value is two times the area under the z curve to the right of value |z|

\(P = 2 \cdot P(Z > 5.3) = 2 \cdot 0 = 0\)

so

Reject null hypothesis

At any reasonable significance level. The value was computed using software (you could use the table in the appendix.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to Exercise\(33\)in Section\(7.3\). The cited article also gave the following observations on degree of polymerization for specimens having viscosity times concentration in a higher range:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{429}&{430}&{430}&{431}&{436}&{437}\\{440}&{441}&{445}&{446}&{447}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Construct a comparative boxplot for the two samples, and comment on any interesting features.

b. Calculate a\(95\% \)confidence interval for the difference between true average degree of polymerization for the middle range and that for the high range. Does the interval suggest that\({\mu _1}\)and\({\mu _2}\)may in fact be different? Explain your reasoning.

Information about hand posture and forces generated by the fingers during manipulation of various daily objects is needed for designing high-tech hand prosthetic devices. The article "Grip Posture and Forces During Holding Cylindrical Objects with Circular Grips" (Ergonomies, 1996: 1163-1176) reported that for a sample of 11 females, the sample mean four-finger pinch strength (N) was 98.1 and the sample standard deviation was 14.2. For a sample of 15 males, the sample mean and sample standard deviation were 129.2 and 39.1, respectively.

a. A test carried out to see whether true average strengths for the two genders were different resulted in t=2.51 and P-value =.019. Does the appropriate test procedure described in this chapter yield this value of t and the stated P-value?

b. Is there substantial evidence for concluding that true average strength for males exceeds that for females by more than 25 N ? State and test the relevant hypotheses.

The accompanying data on response time appeared in the article "'The Extinguishment of Fires Using Low-Flow Water Hose Streams-Part II" (Fire Technology, 1991: 291-320).

Good visibility

.43 1.17 .37 .47 .68 .58 .50 2.75

Poor visibility

1.47 .80 1.58 1.53 4.33 4.23 3.25 3.22

The authors analyzed the data with the pooled t test. Does the use of this test appear justified? (Hint: Check for normality.

The z percentiles for n=8 are -1.53, -.89, -.49, -.15 , .15, .49, .89, and 1.53.)

The derailment of a freight train due to the catastrophic failure of a traction motor armature bearing provided the impetus for a study reported in the article "Locomotive Traction Motor Armature Bearing Life Study" (Lubrication Engr., Aug. 1997: 12-19). A sample of high-mileage traction motors was selected, and the amount of cone penetration (mm/ 10) was determined both for the pinion bearing and for the commutator armature bearing, resulting in the following data:

Motor

1 2 3 4 5 6

Commutator 211 273 305 258 270 209

Pinion 266 278 259 244 273 236

Motor

7 8 9 10 11 12

Commutator 223 288 296 233 262 291

Pinion 290 287 315 242 288 242

Motor

13 14 15 16 17

Commutator 278 275 210 272 264

Pinion 278 208 281 274 268

Calculate an estimate of the population mean difference between penetration for the commutator armature bearing and penetration for the pinion bearing, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimate. (Note: A normal probability plot validates the necessary normality assumption.) Would you say that the population mean difference has been precisely estimated? Does it look as though population mean penetration differs for the two types of bearings? Explain.

An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity \(18Ni\) maraging steel with commercial-purity steel of the same type (Corrosion Science, 1971: 723โ€“736). For \(m = 32\)specimens, the sample average toughness was \(\overline x = 65.6\) for the high purity steel, whereas for \(n = 38\)specimens of commercial steel \(\overline y = 59.8\). Because the high-purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial purity steel by more than 5. Suppose that both toughness distributions are normal.

a. Assuming that \({\sigma _1} = 1.2\) and \({\sigma _2} = 1.1\), test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha = .001\).

b. Compute \(\beta \) for the test conducted in part (a) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 6.\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free