Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Researchers sent 5000 resumes in response to job ads that appeared in the Boston Globe and Chicago Tribune. The resumes were identical except that 2500 of them had "white sounding" first names, such as Brett and Emily, whereas the other 2500 had "black sounding" names such as Tamika and Rasheed. The resumes of the first type elicited 250 responses and the resumes of the second type only 167 responses (these numbers are very consistent with information that appeared in a Jan. 15. 2003, report by the Associated Press). Does this data strongly suggest that a resume with a "black" name is less likely to result in a response than is a resume with a "white" name?

Short Answer

Expert verified

\({\rm{ Reject null hypothesis}}{\rm{. }}\)

Step by step solution

01

To obtain a large- sample test procedure for the hypothesis

A Large-Sample Test Procedure:

The two proportion z statistic - Consider test in which\({H_0}:{p_1} - {p_2} = 0\). The test statistic value for the large samples is

\(z = \frac{{{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}}}{{\sqrt {\hat p\hat q \cdot \frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} }}\)

where

\(\hat p = \frac{m}{{m + n}} \cdot {\hat p_1} + \frac{n}{{m + n}} \cdot {\hat p_2}\)

Depending on alternative hypothesis, the P value can be determined as the corresponding area under the standard normal curve. The test should be used when\(m \cdot {\hat p_1},m \cdot {\hat q_1},n \cdot {\hat p_1}\), and \(n \cdot {\hat q_1}\) are at least 10.

The hypotheses of interest are \({H_0}:{p_1} - {p_2} = 0\)versus\({H_a}:{p_1} - {p_2} > 0\). From the given values, the estimates are

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\hat p}_1} = \frac{{250}}{{2500}} = 0.1\\{{\hat p}_2} = \frac{{167}}{{2500}} = 0.0668\end{array}\)

02

Final proof

Also, the \(\hat p\)is

\(\begin{array}{l}\hat p = \frac{m}{{m + n}} \cdot {{\hat p}_1} + \frac{n}{{m + n}} \cdot {{\hat p}_2} = \frac{{250}}{{250 + 167}} \cdot \frac{{250}}{{2500}} + \frac{{167}}{{250 + 167}} \cdot \frac{{167}}{{2500}}\\ = 0.0834\end{array}\)

The z statistic value is

\(\begin{array}{l} = \frac{{{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}}}{{\sqrt {\hat p\hat q \cdot \frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} }} = \frac{{0.1 - 0.0668}}{{\sqrt {0.0834 \cdot (1 - 0.0834) \cdot (1/250 + 1/167)} }}\\ = 4.2.\end{array}\)

The P values is two times the area of the z curve to the right of the |z| value; thus

\(P = 2 \cdot P(Z > 4.2) = 2 \cdot (1 - P(Z \le 4.2)) = 2 \cdot 0 = 0 < \alpha \)

so

Reject null hypothesis

in any reasonable level. Based on this experiment, it is more likely for a white name to get a response than for a black name.

.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "'Supervised Exercise Versus NonSupervised Exercise for Reducing Weight in Obese 2009: 85-90) reported on an investigation in which participants were randomly assigned to either a supervised exercise program or a control group. Those in the control group were told only that they should take measures to lose weight. After 4 months, the sample mean decrease in body fat for the 17 individuals in the experimental group was 6.2 kg with a sample standard deviation of 4.5 kg, whereas the sample mean and sample standard deviation for the 17 people in the control group were 1.7 kg and 3.1 kg, respectively. Assume normality of the two weight-loss distributions (as did the investigators).

  1. Calculate a 99% lower prediction bound for the weight loss of a single randomly selected individual subjected to the supervised exercise program. Can you be highly confident that such an individual will actually lose weight?
  2. Does it appear that true average decrease in body fat is more than two kg larger for the experimental condition than for the control condition? Use the accompanying Minitab output to reach a conclusion at significance level of .01. (Note: Minitab accepts such summary data as well as individual observations. Also, because the test is upper-tailed, the software provides a lower confidence bound rather than a conventional CI.)

Sample N Mean StDev SE Mean

Exptl 17 6.20 4.50 1.1

Control 17 1.70 3.10 0.75

Difference = mu (1) โ€“ mu (2)

Estimate for difference: 4.50

95% lower bound for difference : 2.25

T โ€“ test of difference = 2 (vs >) :

T โ€“ value = 1.89

P โ€“ value = 0.035 DF =28

Consider the following two questions designed to assess quantitative literacy:

a. What is \[15\% \]of 1000?

b. A store is offering an \[15\% \]off sale on all TVs. The most popular television is normally priced at $1000. How much money would a customer save on the television during this sale?

Suppose the first question is asked of 200 randomly selected college students, with 164 answering correctly; the second one is asked of a different random sample of 200 college students, resulting in 140 correct responses (the sample percentages agree with those given in the article "Using the Right Yardstick: Assessing Financial Literacy Measures by Way of Financial Well-Being," J. of Consumer Affairs, 2013: 243-262; the investigators found that those who answered such questions correctly, particularly questions with context, were significantly more successful in their investment decisions than those who did not answer correctly). Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level 0.05 to decide if the true proportion of correct responses to the question without context exceeds that for the one with context.

Persons having Reynaudโ€™s syndrome are apt to suffer a sudden impairment of blood circulation in fingers and toes. In an experiment to study the extent of this impairment, each subject immersed a forefinger in water and the resulting heat output \((cal/c{m^2}/min)\) was measured. For \(m = 10\) subjects with the syndrome, the average heat output was \(\bar x = .64\), and for \(n = 10\) non-sufferers, the average output was \(2.05\). Let \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) denote the true average heat outputs for the two types of subjects. Assume that the two distributions of heat output are normal with \({\sigma _1} = .2\) and \({\sigma _2} = .4\).

a. Consider testing \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = - 1.0\) versus \({H_2}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} < - 1.0\)at level . \(01\). Describe in words what \({H_a}\) says, and then carry out the test.

b. What is the probability of a type II error when the actual difference between \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) is \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = - 1.2?\)

c. Assuming that \(m = n\), what sample sizes are required to ensure that \(\beta = .1\) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = - 1.2?\)

Refer to Exercise\(33\)in Section\(7.3\). The cited article also gave the following observations on degree of polymerization for specimens having viscosity times concentration in a higher range:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{429}&{430}&{430}&{431}&{436}&{437}\\{440}&{441}&{445}&{446}&{447}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Construct a comparative boxplot for the two samples, and comment on any interesting features.

b. Calculate a\(95\% \)confidence interval for the difference between true average degree of polymerization for the middle range and that for the high range. Does the interval suggest that\({\mu _1}\)and\({\mu _2}\)may in fact be different? Explain your reasoning.

The article "'The Effects of a Low-Fat, Plant-Based Dietary Intervention on Body Weight, Metabolism, and Insulin Sensitivity in Postmenopausal Women" (Amer. J. of Med., \(2005: 991 - 997\)) reported on the results of an experiment in which half of the individuals in a group of\(64\)postmenopausal overweight women were randomly assigned to a particular vegan diet, and the other half received a diet based on National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. The sample mean decrease in body weight for those on the vegan diet was\(5.8\;kg\), and the sample SD was\(3.2\), whereas for those on the control diet, the sample mean weight loss and standard deviation were\(3.8\)and\(2.8\), respectively. Does it appear the true average weight loss for the vegan diet exceeds that for the control diet by more than\(1\;kg\)? Carry out an appropriate test of hypotheses at significance level .05.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free