Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In an experiment to compare bearing strengths of pegs inserted in two different types of mounts, a sample of 14 observations on stress limit for red oak mounts resulted in a sample mean and sample standard deviation of \(8.48MPa\) and .79 MPa, respectively, whereas a sample of 12 observations when Douglas fir mounts were used gave a mean of \(9.36\) and a standard deviation of \(1.52\) ('Bearing Strength of White Oak Pegs in Red Oak and Douglas Fir Timbers," J. of Testing and Evaluation, 1998, 109-114). Consider testing whether or not true average stress limits are identical for the two types of mounts. Compare df's and P-values for the unpooled and pooled t tests.

Short Answer

Expert verified

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{Un pooled:df}} = 15{\rm{,P - value}} \simeq 0.092\\{\rm{Pooled : df}} = 24{\rm{,P - value; = }} \simeq 0.070\\{\rm{Un pooled(df) < Pooled(df)}}\\{\rm{Un pooled(P - value) > Pooled(P - value)}}\end{array}\)

Step by step solution

01

To Find the Unpooled test

The hypotheses of interest here are\({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\)versus\({H_1}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} \ne 0\), where\({\mu _1},{\mu _2}\)are the true averages of the stress limits.

Unpooled test:

Given two normal distributions, the random variable (standardized)

\(t = \frac{{\overline x - \overline y - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n}} }}\)

has approximately students t distribution with degrees of freedom\(\nu \),

\(\nu = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/m} \right)}^2}}}{{m - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/n} \right)}^2}}}{{n - 1}}}}\)

has to be rounded down to the nearest integer.

The two-sample t test for testing\({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = {\Delta _0}\)uses the following value of test statistic

For the adequate alternative hypothesis the adequate area under the\({t_\nu }\)curve is the P value.

The test statistic t value is

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{{8.48 - 9.36 - 0}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{{0.79}^2}}}{{14}} + \frac{{{{1.52}^2}}}{{12}}} }}\\ = \frac{{ - 0.88}}{{0.3869}}\\ = - 1.81\end{array}\)

02

Find the t value

Compute the degrees of freedom now in order to find the P value. From the formula, the following is true

\(\begin{array}{c}\nu = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{{{0.79}^2}}}{{14}} + \frac{{{{1.52}^2}}}{{12}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {{{0.79}^2}/14} \right)}^2}}}{{14 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {{{1.52}^2}/12} \right)}^2}}}{{12 - 1}}}}\\ = 15.95\end{array}\)

and when you round down to the nearest integer you get 15 which is the degrees of freedom. Thus, \(\nu = 15\)

The test is two sided which means that the P value is two times the area under the\({t_{15}}\)curve to the right of\(|t|\). The P value is

\(\begin{array}{c}P = 2 \times P(T > 1.81)\\ = 2 \times 0.046\\ = 0.092\end{array}\)

The value was computed using a software, you can find it or estimate it from the table in the appendix. Random variable T has students distribution with 15 degrees of freedom. It is not needed to draw conclusions about the hypothesis, you just need to compare the pooled and unpooled tests.

03

To Find the pooled test

Pooled test:

The pooled t test for testing\({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = {\Delta _0}\)uses the following t value

\(t = \frac{{\bar x - \bar y - {\Delta _0}}}{{{s_p} \times \sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} }}\)

where the corresponding T statistic has students distribution with m+n-2degrees of freedom, and\({s_p}\)is

\({s_p} = \sqrt {\frac{{(m - 1)s_1^2 + (n - 1)s_2^2}}{{m + n - 2}}} \)

The pooled standard deviation\({s_p}\)is

\(\begin{array}{c}{s_p} = \sqrt {\frac{{(m - 1)s_1^2 + (n - 1)s_2^2}}{{m + n - 2}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{(14 - 1) \times {{0.79}^2} + (12 - 1) \times {{1.52}^2}}}{{14 + 12 - 2}}} \\ = \sqrt {1.3970} \\ = 1.181\end{array}\)

The t statistic value for the pooled test is

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{{8.48 - 9.36 - 0}}{{1.181 \times \sqrt {1/14 + 1/12} }}\\ = \frac{{ - 0.88}}{{0.456}}\\ = - 1.89\end{array}\)

The degrees of freedom\(\nu \)are

\(\begin{array}{c}\nu = m + n - 2\\ = 14 + 12 - 2\\ = 24\end{array}\)

04

To Find the P value

The alternative test hypothesis is\({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} \ne 0\); thus the P value is corresponding area under the\({t_{24}}\)curve (the same way as for the pooled test)

\(\begin{array}{c}P = 2 \times P(T > 1.89)\\ = 2 \times 0.035\\ = 0.07\end{array}\)

The value was computed using a software, you can find it or estimate it from the table in the appendix. Random variable T has students distribution with 24 degrees of freedom.

05

Final proof

Comparison:

The P value for the pooled test is smaller than the P value for the unpooled test Also, the pooled test has more degrees of freedom (24) than the unpooled test (15).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Scientists and engineers frequently wish to compare two different techniques for measuring or determining the value of a variable. In such situations, interest centers on testing whether the mean difference in measurements is zero. The article "Evaluation of the Deuterium Dilution Technique Against the Test Weighing Procedure for the Determination of Breast Milk Intake" (Amer: J. of Clinical Nutr., \(1983: 996 - 1003\)) reports the accompanying data on amount of milk ingested by each of\(14\)randomly selected infants.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;Infant\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;}\\{\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;1\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;2\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;3\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;4\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;5}\\{D method\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;1509\;\;\;\;\;1418\;\;\;\;\;1561\;\;\;\;\;1556\;\;\;\;\;2169}\\{W method\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;1498\;\;\;\;\;1254\;\;\;\;\;1336\;\;\;\;\;1565\;\;\;\;\;2000}\\{jifference\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;11\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;164\;\;\;\;\;\;\;225\;\;\;\;\;\;\; - 9\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;169}\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{}&{Infant}&{}&{}&{}&{}\\{}&6&7&8&9&{10}\\{DD method}&{1760}&{1098}&{1198}&{1479}&{1281}\\{TW method}&{1318}&{1410}&{1129}&{1342}&{1124}\\{Difference}&{442}&{ - 312}&{69}&{137}&{157}\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{}&{Infant}&{}&{}&{}\\{}&{11}&{12}&{13}&{14}\\{DD method}&{1414}&{1954}&{2174}&{2058}\\{TW method}&{1468}&{1604}&{1722}&{1518}\\{Difference}&{ - 54}&{350}&{452}&{540}\end{array}\)

a. Is it plausible that the population distribution of differences is normal?

b. Does it appear that the true average difference between intake values measured by the two methods is something other than zero? Determine the\(P\)-value of the test, and use it to reach a conclusion at significance level . \(05\).

An experiment to compare the tension bond strength of polymer latex modified mortar (Portland cement mortar to which polymer latex emulsions have been added during mixing) to that of unmodified mortar resulted in \(\bar x = 18.12kgf/c{m^2}\)for the modified mortar \((m = 40)\) and \(\bar y = 16.87kgf/c{m^2}\) for the unmodified mortar \((n = 32)\). Let \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) be the true average tension bond strengths for the modified and unmodified mortars, respectively. Assume that the bond strength distributions are both normal.

a. Assuming that \({\sigma _1} = 1.6\) and \({\sigma _2} = 1.4\), test \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\) versus \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 0\) at level . \(01.\)

b. Compute the probability of a type II error for the test of part (a) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1\).

c. Suppose the investigator decided to use a level \(.05\) test and wished \(\beta = .10\) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1. \). If \(m = 40\), what value of n is necessary?

d. How would the analysis and conclusion of part (a) change if \({\sigma _1}\) and \({\sigma _2}\) were unknown but \({s_1} = 1.6\)and \({s_7} = 1.4?\)

Wait staff at restaurants have employed various strategies to increase tips. An article in the Sept. 5, 2005, New Yorker reported that โ€œIn one study a waitress received 50% more in tips when she introduced herself by name than when she didnโ€™t.โ€ Consider the following (fictitious) data on tip amount as a percentage of the bill:

Introduction: \({\bf{m = 50,}}\overline {\bf{x}} {\bf{ = 22}}{\bf{.63,}}{{\bf{s}}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{ = 7}}{\bf{.82}}\)

No introduction: \({\bf{n = 50,}}\overline {\bf{y}} {\bf{ = 14}}{\bf{.15,}}{{\bf{s}}_{\bf{2}}}{\bf{ = 6}}{\bf{.10}}\)

Does this data suggest that an introduction increases tips on average by more than 50%? State and test the relevant hypotheses. (Hint: Consider the parameter \({\bf{\theta = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{ - 1}}{\bf{.5}}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{2}}}\)

Many freeways have service (or logo) signs that give information on attractions, camping, lodging, food, and gas services prior to off-ramps. These signs typically do not provide information on distances. The article "Evaluation of Adding Distance Information to Freeway-Specific Service (Logo) Signs" \((J\). of Transp. Engr., 2011: 782-788) reported that in one investigation, six sites along Virginia interstate highways where service signs are posted were selected. For each site, crash data was obtained for a three-year period before distance information was added to the service signs and for a one-year period afterward. The number of crashes per year before and after the sign changes were as follows:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{Before:\;\;15\;26\;66\;115\;62\;64}\\{After:\;\;\;\;\;16\;24\;42\;80\;\;78\;73}\end{array}\)

a. The cited article included the statement "A paired\(t\)test was performed to determine whether there was any change in the mean number of crashes before and after the addition of distance information on the signs." Carry out such a test. (Note: The relevant normal probability plot shows a substantial linear pattern.)

b. If a seventh site were to be randomly selected among locations bearing service signs, between what values would you predict the difference in number of crashes to lie?

The degenerative disease osteoarthritis most frequently affects weight-bearing joints such as the knee. The article "Evidence of Mechanical Load Redistribution at the Knee Joint in the Elderly When Ascending Stairs and Ramps" (Annals of Biomed. Engr., \(2008: 467 - 476\)) presented the following summary data on stance duration (ms) for samples of both older and younger adults.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{Age\;\;\;\;\;\;\;Sample Size\;\;Sample Mean\;\;Sample SD}\\{\;Older\;\;\;\;\;28\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;801\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;117}\\{Younger\;16\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;780\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;72}\end{array}\)

Assume that both stance duration distributions are normal.

a. Calculate and interpret a\(99\% \)CI for true average stance duration among elderly individuals.

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level\(.05\)to decide whether true average stance duration is larger among elderly individuals than among younger individuals.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free