Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Acrylic bone cement is commonly used in total joint arthroplasty as a grout that allows for the smooth transfer of loads from a metal prosthesis to bone structure. The paper "Validation of the Small-Punch Test as a Technique for Characterizing the Mechanical Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement" U. of Engr. in Med., 2006: 11-21) gave the following data on breaking force (N) :

Temp Medium \(n \) \( \bar x \) \( s\)

\(2{2^\circ }\) Dry 6 170.60 39.08

\(3{7^\circ }\) Dry 6 325.73 34.97

\(2{2^\circ }\) Wet 6 366.36 34.82

\(3{7^\circ }\) Wet 6 306.09 41.97

Assume that all population distributions are normal.

a. Estimate true average breaking force in a dry medium at \(3{7^\circ }\) in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision, and interpret your estimate.

b. Estimate the difference between true average breaking force in a dry medium at \(3{7^\circ }\) and true average force at the same temperature in a wet medium, and do so in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. Then interpret your estimate.

c. Is there strong evidence for concluding that true average force in a dry medium at the higher temperature exceeds that at the lower temperature by more than 100 N ?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) (289.0253,362.4347)

(b) (-30.8080,70.088)

(c) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average force in a dry medium at the higher temperature exceeds that at the lower temperature by more than 100 N.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1: To Estimate true average breaking force in a dry medium at \(3{7^\circ }\) in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision, and interpret your estimate.

(a)

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}\bar x = 325.73\\\\s = 34.97\\\\ n = 6\end{array}\)

I will estimate using a 95% confidence interval. Other confidence levels can be obtained similarly.

\(c = 95\% = 0.95\)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom\(df = n - 1 = 6 - 1 = 5\)and in the column with\(\alpha = 1 - c/2 = 0.025\)in the table of the Student's T distribution:

\({t_\alpha } = 2.571\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \times \frac{s}{{\sqrt n }} = 2.571 \times \frac{{34.97}}{{\sqrt 6 }} \approx 36.7047\)

The boundaries of the confidence interval then become:

\(\begin{array}{l}\bar x - E = 325.73 - 36.7047 = 289.0253\\\bar x + E = 325.73 + 36.7047 = 362.4347\end{array}\)

We are 95 % confident that the true average breaking force in a dry medium at \(3{7^\circ }\) is between 289.0253 and 362.4347

02

Step 2: To Estimate the difference between true average breaking force in a dry medium at \(3{7^\circ }\)  and true average force at the same temperature in a wet medium 

(b)

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 325.73\\{s_1} = 34.97\\ {{\bar x}_2} = 306.09\\{s_2} = 41.97\\{n_1} = {n_2} = 6\end{array}\)

I will estimate using a 95% confidence interval. Other confidence levels can be obtained similarly.

\(c = 95\% = 0.95\)

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{34.9{7^2}}}{6} + \frac{{41.9{7^2}}}{6}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {34.9{7^2}/6} \right)}^2}}}{{6 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {41.9{7^2}/6} \right)}^2}}}{{6 - 1}}}} \approx 9 \)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom $d f=9$ and in the column with\(\alpha = 1 - c/2 = 0.025\)in the Student's t distribution table in the appendix:

\({t_{\alpha /2}} = 2.262\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \times \sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} = 2.262 \times \sqrt {\frac{{34.9{7^2}}}{6} + \frac{{41.9{7^2}}}{6}} \approx 50.4480\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\)are:

\(\begin{array}{l}\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - E = (325.73 - 306.09) - 50.4480 = 19.64 - 50.4480 = - 30.8080 \\\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) + E = (325.73 - 306.09) + 50.4480 = 19.64 + 50.4480 = 70.0880\end{array}\)

03

Step 3: To find dry medium at the higher temperature exceeds that at the lower temperature by more than 100 N

(c)

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 325.73\\{s_1} = 34.97\\{{\bar x}_2} = 170.60\\{s_2} = 39.08\\{n_1} = {n_2} = 6\end{array}\)

Let us assume:\(\alpha = 0.01\)

Given claim: Exceeds by more than 100

The claim is either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis the alternative hypothesis state the opposite of each other. The null hypothesis needs to contain an equality.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 100\\{H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 100\end{array}\)

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{34.9{7^2}}}{6} + \frac{{39.0{8^2}}}{6}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {34.9{7^2}/6} \right)}^2}}}{{6 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {39.0{8^2}/6} \right)}^2}}}{{6 - 1}}}} \approx 9\)

Determine the test statistic:

\(t = \frac{{\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{325.73 - 170.60 - 100}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{34.9{7^2}}}{6} + \frac{{39.0{8^2}}}{6}} }} \approx 2.575\)

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme. The P-value is the number (or interval) in the column title of Student's T distribution in the appendix containing the t-value in the row df=9 :

\(0.01 < P < 0.025\)

If the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, then the null hypothesis is rejected:

\(P < 0.05 \Rightarrow Reject {H_0}\)

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average force in a dry medium at the higher temperature exceeds that at the lower temperature by more than 100 N.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Enhancement of Compressive Properties of Failed Concrete Cylinders with Polymer Impregnation" (J. of Testing and Evaluation, 1977: 333-337) reports the following data on impregnated compressive modulus (\(psi\)\( \times 1{0^6}\)) when two different polymers were used to repair cracks in failed concrete.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Epoxy }&{1.75}&{2.12}&{2.05}&{1.97}\\{ MMA prepolymer }&{1.77}&{1.59}&{1.70}&{1.69}\end{array}\)

Obtain a \(90\% \) CI for the ratio of variances by first using the method suggested in the text to obtain a general confidence interval formula.

Suppose \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) are true mean stopping distances at \(50mph\) for cars of a certain type equipped with two different types of braking systems. Use the two-sample t test at significance level

t test at significance level \(.01\) to test \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = - 10\) versus \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} < - 10\) for the following data: \(m = 6,\;\;\;\bar x = 115.7,{s_1} = 5.03,n = 6,\bar y = 129.3,\;\)and \({s_2} = 5.38.\)

Is the response rate for questionnaires affected by including some sort of incentive to respond along with the questionnaire? In one experiment, 110 questionnaires with no incentive resulted in 75 being returned, whereas 98 questionnaires that included a chance to win a lottery yielded 66 responses ("'Charities, No; Lotteries, No; Cash, Yes," Public Opinion Quarterly, 1996: 542โ€“562). Does this data suggest that including an incentive increases the likelihood of a response? State and test the relevant hypotheses at significance level . 10 .

The invasive diatom species Didymosphenia geminata has the potential to inflict substantial ecological and economic damage in rivers. The article "Substrate Characteristics Affect Colonization by the BloomForming Diatom Didymosphenia geminata" (Acquatic Ecology, 2010:\(33 - 40\)) described an investigation of colonization behavior. One aspect of particular interest was whether the roughness of stones impacted the degree of colonization. The authors of the cited article kindly provided the accompanying data on roughness ratio (dimensionless) for specimens of sandstone and shale.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Sandstone: }&{5.74}&{2.07}&{3.29}&{0.75}&{1.23}\\{}&{2.95}&{1.58}&{1.83}&{1.61}&{1.12}\\{}&{2.91}&{3.22}&{2.84}&{1.97}&{2.48}\\{}&{3.45}&{2.17}&{0.77}&{1.44}&{3.79}\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Shale: }&{.56}&{.84}&{.40}&{.55}&{.36}&{.72}\\{}&{.29}&{.47}&{.66}&{.48}&{.28}&{}\\{}&{.72}&{.31}&{.35}&{.32}&{.37}&{.43}\\{}&{.60}&{.54}&{.43}&{.51}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

Normal probability plots of both samples show a reasonably linear pattern. Estimate the difference between true average roughness for sandstone and that for shale in a way that provides information about reliability and precision, and interpret your estimate. Does it appear that true average roughness differs for the two types of rocks (a formal test of this was reported in the article)? (Note: The investigators concluded that more diatoms colonized the rougher surface than the smoother surface.)

The article "'The Effects of a Low-Fat, Plant-Based Dietary Intervention on Body Weight, Metabolism, and Insulin Sensitivity in Postmenopausal Women" (Amer. J. of Med., \(2005: 991 - 997\)) reported on the results of an experiment in which half of the individuals in a group of\(64\)postmenopausal overweight women were randomly assigned to a particular vegan diet, and the other half received a diet based on National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. The sample mean decrease in body weight for those on the vegan diet was\(5.8\;kg\), and the sample SD was\(3.2\), whereas for those on the control diet, the sample mean weight loss and standard deviation were\(3.8\)and\(2.8\), respectively. Does it appear the true average weight loss for the vegan diet exceeds that for the control diet by more than\(1\;kg\)? Carry out an appropriate test of hypotheses at significance level .05.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free