Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Information about hand posture and forces generated by the fingers during manipulation of various daily objects is needed for designing high-tech hand prosthetic devices. The article "Grip Posture and Forces During Holding Cylindrical Objects with Circular Grips" (Ergonomies, 1996: 1163-1176) reported that for a sample of 11 females, the sample mean four-finger pinch strength (N) was 98.1 and the sample standard deviation was 14.2. For a sample of 15 males, the sample mean and sample standard deviation were 129.2 and 39.1, respectively.

a. A test carried out to see whether true average strengths for the two genders were different resulted in t=2.51 and P-value =.019. Does the appropriate test procedure described in this chapter yield this value of t and the stated P-value?

b. Is there substantial evidence for concluding that true average strength for males exceeds that for females by more than 25 N ? State and test the relevant hypotheses.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) \(t = - 2.836,0.01 < P < 0.02\)

(b) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average strength for males exceeds that for females by more than 25N.

Step-by-step-solution

Given in the output:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 98.1\\{s_1} = 14.2\\{{\bar x}_2} = 129.2\\{s_2} = 39.1\\{n_1} = 11\\{n_2} = 15\end{array}\)

Let us assume:

\(\alpha = 0.05\)

Step by step solution

01

To find the appropriate test procedure described in this chapter yield this value of t and the stated P-value 

(a)

Given claim: Differs

The claim is either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis state the opposite of each other. The null hypothesis needs to contain an equality.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _1} = {\mu _2}\\{H_a}:{\mu _1} \ne {\mu _2}\end{array}\)

Determine the test statistic:

\(t = \frac{{\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{98.1 - 129.2 - 0}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{14.{2^2}}}{{11}} + \frac{{39.{1^2}}}{{15}}} }} \approx - 2.836\)

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{14.{2^2}}}{{11}} + \frac{{39.{1^2}}}{{15}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {14.{2^2}/11} \right)}^2}}}{{11 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {39.{1^2}/15} \right)}^2}}}{{15 - 1}}}} \approx 18\)

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme. The P-value is the number (or interval) in the column title of Student's T distribution in the appendix containing the t-value in the row d f=18 :

\(0.01 = 2 \times 0.005 < P < 2 \times 0.01 = 0.02\)

We then note that the given t-value is not correct

02

To State and test the relevant hypotheses.

(b)

Given claim: More than 25

The claim is either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis state the opposite of each other. The null hypothesis needs to contain an equality.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = - 25\\{H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} < - 25\end{array}\)

Determine the test statistic:

\(t = \frac{{\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{98.1 - 129.2 - ( - 25)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{14.{2^2}}}{{11}} + \frac{{39.{1^2}}}{{15}}} }} \approx - 0.556\)

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{14.{2^2}}}{{11}} + \frac{{39.{1^2}}}{{15}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {14.{2^2}/11} \right)}^2}}}{{11 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {39.{1^2}/15} \right)}^2}}}{{15 - 1}}}} \approx 18\)

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme. The P-value is the number (or interval) in the column title of Student's T distribution in the appendix containing the t-value in the row d f=18 :

\(P > 2 \times 0.10 = 0.20\)

If the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, then the null hypothesis is rejected:

\(P > 0.05 \Rightarrow Fail to reject {H_0}\)

There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average strength for males exceeds that for females by more than 25 N.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In medical investigations, the ratio \(\theta = {p_1}/{p_2}\)is often of more interest than the difference \({p_1} - {p_2}\)(e.g., individuals given treatment 1 are how many times as likely to recover as those given treatment\(2?)\). Let\(\hat \theta = {\hat p_1}/{\hat p_2}\). When \(m\)and n are both large, the statistic \(ln(\theta )\)has approximately a normal distribution with approximate mean value \(ln(\theta )\)and approximate standard deviation \({[(m - x)/(mx) + (n - y)/(ny)]^{1/2}}.\)

  1. Use these facts to obtain a large-sample 95 % CI formula for estimating\(ln(\theta )\), and then a CI for \(\theta \)itself.
  2. Return to the heart-attack data of Example 1.3, and calculate an interval of plausible values for \(\theta \)at the 95 % confidence level. What does this interval suggest about the efficacy of the aspirin treatment?

a. Show for the upper-tailed test with \({\sigma _1}\) and \({\sigma _2}\)known that as either\(m\) or\(n\) increases, \(\beta \)decreases when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > {\Delta _0}\).

b. For the case of equal sample sizes \(\left( {m = n} \right)\)and fixed \(\alpha \),what happens to the necessary sample size \(n\) as \(\beta \) is decreased, where \(\beta \) is the desired type II error probability at a fixed alternative?

Example\(7.11\)gave data on the modulus of elasticity obtained\(1\)minute after loading in a certain configuration. The cited article also gave the values of modulus of elasticity obtained\(4\)weeks after loading for the same lumber specimens. The data is presented here. \(1\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{Observation}&{1 min}&{4 weeks}&{Difference}\\1&{10,490}&{9,110}&{1380}\\2&{16,620}&{13,250}&{3370}\\3&{17,300}&{14,720}&{2580}\\4&{15,480}&{12,740}&{2740}\\5&{12,970}&{10,120}&{2850}\\6&{17,260}&{14,570}&{2690}\\7&{13,400}&{11,220}&{2180}\\8&{13,900}&{11,100}&{2800}\\9&{13,630}&{11,420}&{2210}\\{10}&{13,260}&{10,910}&{2350}\\{11}&{14,370}&{12,110}&{2260}\\{12}&{11,700}&{8,620}&{3080}\\{13}&{15,470}&{12,590}&{2880}\\{14}&{17,840}&{15,090}&{2750}\\{15}&{14,070}&{10,550}&{3520}\\{16}&{14,760}&{12,230}&{2530}\end{array}\)

Calculate and interpret an upper confidence bound for the true average difference between\(1\)-minute modulus and\(4\)-week modulus; first check the plausibility of any necessary assumptions.

The article "Fatigue Testing of Condoms" cited in Exercise 7.32 reported that for a sample of 20 natural latex condoms of a certain type, the sample mean and sample standard deviation of the number of cycles to break were 4358 and 2218 , respectively, whereas a sample of 20 polyisoprene condoms gave a sample mean and sample standard deviation of 5805 and 3990 , respectively. Is there strong evidence for concluding that true average number of cycles to break for the polyisoprene condom exceeds that for the natural latex condom by more than 1000 cycles? Carry out a test using a significance level of 01 . (Note: The cited paper reported P-values of t tests for comparing means of the various types considered.)

Tensile-strength tests were carried out on two different grades of wire rod (โ€œFluidized Bed Patenting of Wire Rods,โ€ Wire J., June \(1977: 56 - 61)\), resulting in the accompanying data

Sample

Sample Mean Sample

Grade Size (kg/mm2 ) SD

\(\overline {\underline {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ AISI 1064}&{m = 129}&{\bar x = 107.6}&{{s_1} = 1.3}\\{ AISI 1078}&{n = 129}&{\bar y = 123.6}&{{s_2} = 2.0}\\{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}} } \)

a. Does the data provide compelling evidence for concluding that true average strength for the \(1078\) grade exceeds that for the \(1064\) grade by more than \(10kg/m{m^2}\) ? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\).

b. Estimate the difference between true average strengths for the two grades in a way that provides information about precision and reliability

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free