Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Shoveling is not exactly a high-tech activity, but it will continue to be a required task even in our information age. The article "A Shovel with a Perforated Blade Reduces Energy Expenditure Required for Digging Wet Clay" (Human Factors, 2010: 492-502) reported on an experiment in which 13 workers were each provided with both a conventional shovel and a shovel whose blade was perforated with small holes. The authors of the cited article provided the following data on stable energy expenditure ((kcal/kg(subject)//b(clay)):

Worker : 1 2 3 4

Conventional : .0011 .0014 .0018 .0022

Perforated : .0011 .0010 .0019 .0013

Worker: 5 6 7

Conventional : .0010 .0016 .0028

Perforated : .0011 .0017 .0024

Worker 8 9 10

Conventional : .0020 .0015 .0014

Perforated : .0020 .0013 .0013

Worker: 11 12 13

Conventional : .0023 .0017 .0020

Perforated : .0017 .0015 .0013

a. Calculate a confidence interval at the 95 % confidence level for the true average difference between energy expenditure for the conventional shovel and the perforated shovel (the relevant normal probability plot shows a reasonably linear pattern). Based on this interval, does it appear that the shovels differ with respect to true average energy expenditure? Explain.

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05 to see if true average energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) \((0.00002, 0.00038)\)

Shovels appear to differ with respect to the true average energy expenditure.

(b) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel.

Step by step solution

01

To Calculate a confidence interval at the 95 % confidence level for the true average difference between energy expenditure for the conventional shovel and the perforated shovel 

(a)

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}n = 13 \\c = 95\% = 0.95\end{array}\)

Determine the difference in value of each pair.

Determine the sample mean of the differences. The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values.

\(\bar d = \frac{{0 + 0.0004 - 0.0001 + \ldots + 0.0006 + 0.0002 + 0.0007}}{{13}} \approx 0.0002\)

Determine the sample standard deviation of the differences:

\({s_d} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(0 - 0.0002)}^2} + \ldots + {{(0.0007 - 0.0002)}^2}}}{{13 - 1}}} \approx 0.0003\)

Determine the\({t_{\alpha /2}}\) using the Student's T distribution table in the appendix with\(df = n - 1 = 13 - 1 = 12\) :

\({t_{0.025}} = 2.179\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \times \frac{{{s_d}}}{{\sqrt n }} = 2.179 \times \frac{{0.0003}}{{\sqrt {13} }} \approx 0.00018\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for\({\mu _d}\) are:

\(\begin{array}{l}\bar d - E = 0.0002 - 0.00018 = 0.00002\\\bar d + E = 0.0002 + 0.00018 = 0.00038\end{array}\)

Shovels appear to differ with respect to the true average energy expenditure, because 0 does not lie in the confidence interval.

02

To find test of hypotheses at significance level .05 to see if true average energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel.

(b)

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}n = 13 \\\alpha = 0.05\end{array}\)

Given claim: exceeds

The claim is either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis state the opposite of each other. The null hypothesis needs to contain the value mentioned in the claim.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _d} = 0\\{H_a}:{\mu _d} > 0\end{array}\)

Determine the difference in value of each pair.

Determine the sample mean of the differences. The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values.

\(\bar d = \frac{{0 + 0.0004 - 0.0001 + \cdots + 0.0006 + 0.0002 + 0.0007}}{{13}} \approx 0.0002\)

Determine the sample standard deviation of the differences:

\({s_d} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(0 - 0.0002)}^2} + \ldots + {{(0.0007 - 0.0002)}^2}}}{{13 - 1}}} \approx 0.0003\)

Determine the value of the test statistic:

\(t = \frac{{\bar d}}{{{s_d}/\sqrt n }} = \frac{{0.0002}}{{0.0003/\sqrt {13} }} \approx 2.404\)

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. The P-value is the number (or interval) in the column title of the Student's T distribution in the appendix containing the t-value in the row\(df = n - 1 = 13 - 1 = 12\) :

\(0.01 < P < 0.025\)

If the P-value is less than the significance level, reject the null hypothesis.

\(P < 0.05 \Rightarrow Reject {H_0}\)

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "'The Accuracy of Stated Energy Contents of Reduced-Energy, Commercially Prepared Foods" (J. of the Amer. Dietetic Assoc.s 2010: 116-123) presented the accompanying data on vendor-stated gross energy and measured value (both in kcal) for 10 different supermarket convenience meals):

Meal: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Stated: 180 220 190 230 200 370 250 240 80 180

Measured: 212 319 231 306 211 431 288 265 145 228

Carry out a test of hypotheses to decide whether the true average % difference from that stated differs from zero. (Note: The article stated "Although formal statistical methods do not apply to convenience samples, standard statistical tests were employed to summarize the data for exploratory purposes and to suggest directions for future studies.")

To decide whether two different types of steel have the same true average fracture toughness values, n specimens of each type are tested, yielding the following results:

\(\begin{array}{l}\underline {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ Type }&{ Sample Average }&{ Sample SD }\\1&{60.1}&{1.0}\\2&{59.9}&{1.0}\\{}&{}&{}\end{array}} \\\end{array}\)

Calculate the P-value for the appropriate two-sample \(z\) test, assuming that the data was based on \(n = 100\). Then repeat the calculation for \(n = 400\). Is the small P-value for \(n = 400\) indicative of a difference that has practical significance? Would you have been satisfied with just a report of the P-value? Comment briefly.a

Fusible interlinings are being used with increasing frequency to support outer fabrics and improve the shape and drape of various pieces of clothing. The article "Compatibility of Outer and Fusible Interlining Fabrics in Tailored Garments" (Textile Res. J., \(1997: 137 - 142\)) gave the accompanying data on extensibility\((\% )\)at\(100gm/cm\)for both high-quality (H) fabric and poor-quality (P) fabric specimens.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{r}}H&{1.2}&{.9}&{.7}&{1.0}&{1.7}&{1.7}&{1.1}&{.9}&{1.7}\\{}&{1.9}&{1.3}&{2.1}&{1.6}&{1.8}&{1.4}&{1.3}&{1.9}&{1.6}\\{}&{.8}&{2.0}&{1.7}&{1.6}&{2.3}&{2.0}&{}&{}&{}\\P&{1.6}&{1.5}&{1.1}&{2.1}&{1.5}&{1.3}&{1.0}&{2.6}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Construct normal probability plots to verify the plausibility of both samples having been selected from normal population distributions.

b. Construct a comparative boxplot. Does it suggest that there is a difference between true average extensibility for high-quality fabric specimens and that for poor-quality specimens?

c. The sample mean and standard deviation for the highquality sample are\(1.508\)and\(.444\), respectively, and those for the poor-quality sample are\(1.588\)and\(.530.\)Use the two-sample\(t\)test to decide whether true average extensibility differs for the two types of fabric.

Wait staff at restaurants have employed various strategies to increase tips. An article in the Sept. 5, 2005, New Yorker reported that โ€œIn one study a waitress received 50% more in tips when she introduced herself by name than when she didnโ€™t.โ€ Consider the following (fictitious) data on tip amount as a percentage of the bill:

Introduction: \({\bf{m = 50,}}\overline {\bf{x}} {\bf{ = 22}}{\bf{.63,}}{{\bf{s}}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{ = 7}}{\bf{.82}}\)

No introduction: \({\bf{n = 50,}}\overline {\bf{y}} {\bf{ = 14}}{\bf{.15,}}{{\bf{s}}_{\bf{2}}}{\bf{ = 6}}{\bf{.10}}\)

Does this data suggest that an introduction increases tips on average by more than 50%? State and test the relevant hypotheses. (Hint: Consider the parameter \({\bf{\theta = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{ - 1}}{\bf{.5}}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{2}}}\)

Consider the following two questions designed to assess quantitative literacy:

a. What is \[15\% \]of 1000?

b. A store is offering an \[15\% \]off sale on all TVs. The most popular television is normally priced at $1000. How much money would a customer save on the television during this sale?

Suppose the first question is asked of 200 randomly selected college students, with 164 answering correctly; the second one is asked of a different random sample of 200 college students, resulting in 140 correct responses (the sample percentages agree with those given in the article "Using the Right Yardstick: Assessing Financial Literacy Measures by Way of Financial Well-Being," J. of Consumer Affairs, 2013: 243-262; the investigators found that those who answered such questions correctly, particularly questions with context, were significantly more successful in their investment decisions than those who did not answer correctly). Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level 0.05 to decide if the true proportion of correct responses to the question without context exceeds that for the one with context.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free