Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The article "Enhancement of Compressive Properties of Failed Concrete Cylinders with Polymer Impregnation" (J. of Testing and Evaluation, 1977: 333-337) reports the following data on impregnated compressive modulus (\(psi\)\( \times 1{0^6}\)) when two different polymers were used to repair cracks in failed concrete.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Epoxy }&{1.75}&{2.12}&{2.05}&{1.97}\\{ MMA prepolymer }&{1.77}&{1.59}&{1.70}&{1.69}\end{array}\)

Obtain a \(90\% \) CI for the ratio of variances by first using the method suggested in the text to obtain a general confidence interval formula.

Short Answer

Expert verified

\(\begin{array}{l}\frac{{s_2^2}}{{s_1^2}} \cdot {F_{1 - \alpha /2,m - 1,n - 1}} \le \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{{\sigma _1^2}} \le \frac{{s_2^2}}{{s_1^2}} \cdot {F_{\alpha /2,m - 1,n - 1}}\\ = (0.023,1.99)\end{array}\)

Step by step solution

01

To find the confidence interval

The confidence interval for the ratio of the two variances with approximate \(100(1 - \alpha )\)confidence level can be obtained from

\(P\left( {{F_{1 - \alpha /2,m - 1,n - 1}} \le \frac{{S_1^2/\sigma _1^2}}{{S_2^2/\sigma _2^2}} \le {F_{\alpha /2,m - 1,n - 1}}} \right) = 1 - \alpha \)

Look at

\({F_{1 - \alpha /2,m - 1,n - 1}} \le \frac{{S_1^2/\sigma _1^2}}{{S_2^2/\sigma _2^2}} \le {F_{\alpha /2,m - 1,n - 1}}\)

This is obviously equivalent to

\(\frac{{S_2^2}}{{S_1^2}}{F_{1 - \alpha /2,m - 1,n - 1}} \le \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{{\sigma _1^2}} \le \frac{{S_2^2}}{{S_1^2}}{F_{\alpha /2,m - 1,n - 1}}\)

By substituting corresponding values with sample standard deviations

\(\)

\({s_1}\)and \({s_2}\)the confidence interval for the proportion of the two variances is obtained

\(\frac{{s_2^2}}{{s_1^2}} \cdot {F_{1 - \alpha /2,m - 1,n - 1}} \le \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{{\sigma _1^2}} \le \frac{{s_2^2}}{{s_1^2}} \cdot {F_{\alpha /2,m - 1,n - 1}} \cdot \)

To obtain \(90\% \)confidence interval for the ratio of the variances \((\alpha = 0.1)\)the sample standard deviations of the \(m = n = 4\) sized samples are needed.

The Sample Variance \({s^2}\)is

\({s^2} = \frac{1}{{n - 1}} \cdot {S_{xx}}\)

where

\({S_{xx}} = \sum {{{\left( {{x_i} - \bar x} \right)}^2}} = \sum {x_i^2} - \frac{1}{n} \cdot {\left( {\sum {{x_i}} } \right)^2}\)

The Sample Standard Deviation \(s\) is

\(s = \sqrt {{s^2}} = \sqrt {\frac{1}{{n - 1}} \cdot {S_{xx}}} \)

Thus, the sample standard deviations are, for the Epoxy

\(\begin{array}{c}{s_1} = \sqrt {\frac{1}{{4 - 1}} \cdot \left( {\left( {{{1.75}^2} + {{2.12}^2} + {{2.05}^2} + {{1.97}^2}} \right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot {{(1.75 + 2.12 + 2.05 + 1.97)}^2}} \right)} \\ = 0.16\end{array}\)

and, for the MMA prepolymer sample

\(\begin{array}{c}{s_1} = \sqrt {\frac{1}{{4 - 1}} \cdot \left( {\left( {{{1.77}^2} + {{1.59}^2} + {{1.7}^2} + {{1.69}^2}} \right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot {{(1.77 + 1.59 + 1.7 + 1.69)}^2}} \right)} \\ = 0.074.\end{array}\)

02

Final proof

Also, for\(\alpha = 0.1(\alpha /2 = 0.05)\), the \(F\) values are

\(\begin{array}{c}{F_{0.05,3,3}} = 9.28\\{F_{0.95,3,3}} = \frac{1}{{{F_{0.05,3,3}}}}\\ = 0.108\end{array}\)

Finally, the \(90\% \)confidence interval for the proportion is

\(\left( {\frac{{s_2^2}}{{s_1^2}} \cdot {F_{1 - \alpha /2,m - 1,n - 1}},\frac{{s_2^2}}{{s_1^2}} \cdot {F_{\alpha /2,m - 1,n - 1}}} \right)\)

\(\begin{array}{l} = \left( {\frac{{{{0.074}^2}}}{{{{0.16}^2}}} \cdot 1.108,\frac{{{{0.074}^2}}}{{{{0.16}^2}}} \cdot 9.28} \right)\\ = (0.023,1.99).\end{array}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Teen Court is a juvenile diversion program designed to circumvent the formal processing of first-time juvenile offenders within the juvenile justice system. The article "An Experimental Evaluation of Teen Courts" (J. of Experimental Criminology, 2008: 137-163) reported on a study in which offenders were randomly assigned either to Teen Court or to the traditional Department of Juvenile Services method of processing. Of the \(56TC\) individuals, 18 subsequently recidivated (look it up!) during the 18 -month follow-up period, whereas 12 of the 51 DJS individuals did so. Does the data suggest that the true proportion of TC individuals who recidivate during the specified follow-up period differs from the proportion of DJS individuals who do so? State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of 0.10.

Tensile-strength tests were carried out on two different grades of wire rod (โ€œFluidized Bed Patenting of Wire Rods,โ€ Wire J., June \(1977: 56 - 61)\), resulting in the accompanying data

Sample

Sample Mean Sample

Grade Size (kg/mm2 ) SD

\(\overline {\underline {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ AISI 1064}&{m = 129}&{\bar x = 107.6}&{{s_1} = 1.3}\\{ AISI 1078}&{n = 129}&{\bar y = 123.6}&{{s_2} = 2.0}\\{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}} } \)

a. Does the data provide compelling evidence for concluding that true average strength for the \(1078\) grade exceeds that for the \(1064\) grade by more than \(10kg/m{m^2}\) ? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\).

b. Estimate the difference between true average strengths for the two grades in a way that provides information about precision and reliability

A mechanical engineer wishes to compare strength properties of steel beams with similar beams made with a particular alloy. The same number of beams, \(n\), of each type will be tested. Each beam will be set in a horizontal position with a support on each end, a force of \(2500lb\) will be applied at the center, and the deflection will be measured. From past experience with such beams, the engineer is willing to assume that the true standard deviation of deflection for both types of beam is \(.05in\). Because the alloy is more expensive, the engineer wishes to test at level \(.01\) whether it has smaller average deflection than the steel beam. What value of n is appropriate if the desired type II error probability is \(.05\) when the difference in true average deflection favors the alloy by \(.04in\).?

The article "'The Accuracy of Stated Energy Contents of Reduced-Energy, Commercially Prepared Foods" (J. of the Amer. Dietetic Assoc.s 2010: 116-123) presented the accompanying data on vendor-stated gross energy and measured value (both in kcal) for 10 different supermarket convenience meals):

Meal: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Stated: 180 220 190 230 200 370 250 240 80 180

Measured: 212 319 231 306 211 431 288 265 145 228

Carry out a test of hypotheses to decide whether the true average % difference from that stated differs from zero. (Note: The article stated "Although formal statistical methods do not apply to convenience samples, standard statistical tests were employed to summarize the data for exploratory purposes and to suggest directions for future studies.")

Torsion during hip external rotation (ER) and extension may be responsible for certain kinds of injuries in golfers and other athletes. The article "Hip Rotational Velocities During the Full Golf Swing" (J. of Sports Science and Medicine, 2009: 296-299) reported on a study in which peak ER velocity and peak IR (internal rotation) velocity (both in deg.sec\(^{ - 1}\)) were determined for a sample of 15 female collegiate golfers during their swings. The following data was supplied by the article's authors.

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{r}}{ Golfer }&{ \backslash multicolumn1c ER }&{ IR }&{ \backslash multicolumn1c diff }&{z perc }\\1&{ - 130.6}&{ - 98.9}&{ - 31.7}&{ - 1.28}\\2&{ - 125.1}&{ - 115.9}&{ - 9.2}&{ - 0.97}\\3&{ - 51.7}&{ - 161.6}&{109.9}&{0.34}\\4&{ - 179.7}&{ - 196.9}&{17.2}&{ - 0.73}\\5&{ - 130.5}&{ - 170.7}&{40.2}&{ - 0.34}\\6&{ - 101.0}&{ - 274.9}&{173.9}&{0.97}\\7&{ - 24.4}&{ - 275.0}&{250.6}&{1.83}\\8&{ - 231.1}&{ - 275.7}&{44.6}&{ - 0.17}\\9&{ - 186.8}&{ - 214.6}&{27.8}&{ - 0.52}\\{10}&{ - 58.5}&{ - 117.8}&{59.3}&{0.00}\\{11}&{ - 219.3}&{ - 326.7}&{107.4}&{0.17}\\{12}&{ - 113.1}&{ - 272.9}&{159.8}&{0.73}\\{13}&{ - 244.3}&{ - 429.1}&{184.8}&{1.28}\\{14}&{ - 184.4}&{ - 140.6}&{ - 43.8}&{ - 1.83}\\{15}&{ - 199.2}&{ - 345.6}&{146.4}&{0.52}\\{}&{}&{}&{}&{}\end{aligned}\)

a. Is it plausible that the differences came from a normally distributed population?

b. The article reported that mean\(( \pm SD) = - 145.3(68.0)\)for ER velocity and\( = - 227.8(96.6)\)for IR velocity. Based just on this information, could a test of hypotheses about the difference between true average IR velocity and true average ER velocity be carried out? Explain.

c. The article stated that " The lead hip peak IR velocity was significantly greater than the trail hip ER velocity\(\;\left( {p = 0.003, t value = 3.65} \right)\). "$ (The phrasing suggests that an upper-tailed test was used.) Is that in fact the case? (Note: "\(p = .033 \)in Table 2 of the article is erroneous.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free