Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

An experiment to compare the tension bond strength of polymer latex modified mortar (Portland cement mortar to which polymer latex emulsions have been added during mixing) to that of unmodified mortar resulted in \(\bar x = 18.12kgf/c{m^2}\)for the modified mortar \((m = 40)\) and \(\bar y = 16.87kgf/c{m^2}\) for the unmodified mortar \((n = 32)\). Let \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) be the true average tension bond strengths for the modified and unmodified mortars, respectively. Assume that the bond strength distributions are both normal.

a. Assuming that \({\sigma _1} = 1.6\) and \({\sigma _2} = 1.4\), test \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\) versus \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 0\) at level . \(01.\)

b. Compute the probability of a type II error for the test of part (a) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1\).

c. Suppose the investigator decided to use a level \(.05\) test and wished \(\beta = .10\) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1. \). If \(m = 40\), what value of n is necessary?

d. How would the analysis and conclusion of part (a) change if \({\sigma _1}\) and \({\sigma _2}\) were unknown but \({s_1} = 1.6\)and \({s_7} = 1.4?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

the solution is

a.Reject null hypothesis

\(\begin{array}{l}b. \beta (1) = 0.3085;\\c. n = 38; \end{array}\)

d. could not use the same test

Step by step solution

01

calculate p value

given

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\bar x = 18.12kgf/c{m^2};}&{m = 40}\\{\bar y = 16.87kgf/c{m^2};}&{n = 32}\end{array}\)

Assume that the bond strength distributions are normal.

a)

the null hypothesis is

\({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = {\Delta _0}\)

The test statistic value is based on the assumption of two normal population distributions with known \({\sigma _1}\) and \({\sigma _2}\) values, as well as two independent random samples.

\(z = \frac{{(\bar x - \bar y) - {\Delta _0}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{m} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{n}} }}\)

The \(P\) value is used to determine the sufficient area under the standard normal curve for the adequate alternative hypothesis.

The standard deviations' values are known.

\(\begin{array}{l}{\sigma _1} = 1.6\\{\sigma _2} = 1.4\end{array}\)

The \({\Delta _0} = 0\) and the alternative hypothesis is \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 0\). The value of the test statistic is

\(z = \frac{{18.12 - 16.87}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{1.{6^2}}}{{40}} + \frac{{1.{4^2}}}{{32}}} }} = 3.53\)

The area under the standard normal curve to the right of \(z\) can be used to get the \(P\) value. The \(P\) value is calculated using the table in the appendix or software.

\(P = P(Z > 3.53) = 1 - P(Z \le 3.53) = 1 - 0.9998 = 0.0002\)

Since

\(P = 0.0002 < 0.01 = \alpha \)

The null hypothesis should be reject.

02

compute probability of type II error

depending on alternative hypothesis the type II error\(\beta \)when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = \Delta '\)

differs. The alternative hypothesis is \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 0\) and \(\Delta ' = 1\), in this case the type II error is

\(\beta \left( {{\Delta ^}} \right) = \Phi \left( {{z_\alpha } - \frac{{{\Delta ^} - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma }} \right)\)

Where

\(\sigma = \sqrt {\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{m} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{n}} \)

The significance level is \(\alpha = 0.01,{z_\alpha } = {z_{0.01}} = 2.33, \)

\(\sigma = \sqrt {\frac{{1.{6^2}}}{{40}} + \frac{{1.{4^2}}}{{32}}} = 0.3539.\)

Finally, the type II error when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1\) is

\(\beta (1) = \Phi \left( {2.33 - \frac{{1 - 0}}{{0.3539}}} \right) = \Phi ( - 0.4) = 0.3085\)

03

use the table in the appendix

similarly as in (b), from

\(\beta \left( {\Delta '} \right) = \Phi \left( {{z_\alpha } - \frac{{\Delta ' - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma }} \right)\)

For \(\Delta ' = 1,\beta (1) = 0.1{z_\alpha } = {z_{0.05}} = 1.645.\)using the fact

\(\Phi (1.28) = 0.1\)

Which was obtained from the table in the appendix in the book, the following holds

\(\begin{array}{l}\beta \left( {\Delta '} \right) = \Phi \left( {{z_\alpha } - \frac{{\Delta ' - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma }} \right)\\0.1 = \Phi \left( {{z_\alpha } - \frac{{\Delta ' - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma }} \right) and 0.1 = \Phi (1.28)\\\Phi (1.28) = \Phi \left( {{z_\alpha } - \frac{{\Delta ' - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma }} \right)\end{array}\)

Because \(\Phi \)is cdf of standard normal distribution, the following is true

\(\begin{array}{l}{z_\alpha } - \frac{{\Delta ' - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma } = 1.28\\2.33 - \frac{{1 - 0}}{\sigma } = 1.28\\{\sigma ^2} = \frac{1}{{{{(1.645 + 1.28)}^2}}}\end{array}\)

Remember that

\(\begin{array}{l}\sigma = \sqrt {\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{m} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{n}} \\{\sigma ^2} = \frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{m} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{n} = \frac{{1.{6^2}}}{{40}} + \frac{{1.{4^2}}}{n}\end{array}\)

04

conclusion of part (a)

by substituting this, the following is true

\(\begin{array}{l}\frac{{1.{6^2}}}{{40}} + \frac{{1.{4^2}}}{n} = \frac{1}{{{{(1.645 + 1.28)}^2}}}\\\frac{{1.{6^2}}}{{40}} + \frac{{1.{4^2}}}{n} = 0.1169\\\frac{{1.96}}{n} = 0.0529\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{l}n = 37.06\\{\rm{n = 38}}\end{array}\)

d)

The sample size \(n = 32\) is insufficient for the large sample test to be used. This question is a "bait" to get you to say:

When there is a null hypothesis.

\({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = {\Delta _0}\)

The test statistic value

\(z = \frac{{(\bar x - \bar y) - {\Delta _0}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n}} }}.\)

The \(P\) value is derived for the acceptable alternative hypothesis by calculating the adequate area under the standard normal curve. When both \(m > 40 and n > 40\) are true, this test can be applied.

However, because \(n\) is insufficient, the \(t\) test from section \(9.2\) should be applied.

05

conclusion

  1. Reject null hypothesis

\(\begin{array}{l}b. \beta (1) = 0.3085;\\c. n = 38; \end{array}\)

d. could not use the same test

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following observations are on time (h) for a AA 1.5volt alkaline battery to reach a \(0.8\)voltage ("Comparing the Lifetimes of Two Brands of Batteries," J. of Statistical Educ., 2013, online):

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Energizer: }&{8.65}&{8.74}&{8.91}&{8.72}&{8.85}\\{ Ultracell: }&{8.76}&{8.81}&{8.81}&{8.70}&{8.73}\\{ Energizer: }&{8.52}&{8.62}&{8.68}&{8.86}&{}\\{ Ultracell: }&{8.76}&{8.68}&{8.64}&{8.79}&{}\end{array}\)

Normal probability plots support the assumption that the population distributions are normal. Does the data suggest that the variance of the Energizer population distribution differs from that of the Ultra cell population distribution? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of .05. (Note: The two-sample \(t\)test for equality of population means gives a \(P - \)value of .763.) The Energizer batteries are much more expensive than the Ultra cell batteries. Would you pay the extra money?

Adding computerized medical images to a database promises to provide great resources for physicians. However, there are other methods of obtaining such information, so the issue of efficiency of access needs to be investigated. The article "The Comparative Effectiveness of Conventional and Digital Image Libraries" J. of Audiovisual Media in Medicine, 2001: 8-15) reported on an experiment in which 13 computerproficient medical professionals were timed both while retrieving an image from a library of slides and while retrieving the same image from a computer database with a Web front end.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\;Subject\;\;\;\;\;1\;\;\;2\;\;3\;\;\;4\;\;\;5\;\;\;6\;\;\;\;\;7}\\{\;Slide\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;30\;35\;40\;25\;20\;30\;\;35}\\{\;Digital\;\;\;\;\;\;\;25\;16\;15\;15 10\;20\;\;\;7}\\{\;Difference\;\;5\;19\;25\;10\;10\;10\;28}\\{\;Subject\;\;\;\;\;8\;\;9\;\;10\;11\;12\;13}\\{\;Slide\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;62\;40\;51\;25\;42\;33\;}\\{Digital\;\;\;\;\;\;\;16\;15\;13\;11\;19\;19}\\{Difference\;46\;25\;38\;14\;23\;14}\end{array}\)

a. Construct a comparative boxplot of times for the two types of retrieval, and comment on any interesting features.

b. Estimate the difference between true average times for the two types of retrieval in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. Be sure to check the plausibility of any assumptions needed in your analysis. Does it appear plausible that the true average times for the two types of retrieval are identical? Why or why not?

The article "Effect of Internal Gas Pressure on the Compression Strength of Beverage Cans and Plastic Bottles" (J. of Testing and Evaluation, \(1993: 129 - 131\)) includes the accompanying data on compression strength (lb) for a sample of\(12 - oz\)aluminum cans filled with strawberry drink and another sample filled with cola. Does the data suggest that the extra carbonation of cola results in a higher average compression strength? Base your answer on a\(P\)-value. What assumptions are necessary for your analysis?

\(\begin{array}{l}BeverageSampleSizeSampleMeanSampleSD\\Strawberrydrink1554021\\Cola1555415\end{array}\)

Arsenic is a known carcinogen and poison. The standard laboratory procedures for measuring arsenic \(concentration (\mu g/L)\) in water are expensive. Consider the accompanying summary data and Minitab output for comparing a laboratory method to a new relatively quick and inexpensive field method (from the article "Evaluation of a New Field Measurement Method for Arsenic in Drinking Water Samples," J. of Emvir. Engr., 2008: 382-388).

Two-Sample T-Test and CI

Sample N Mean StDev SE Mean

1 3 19.70 1.10 0.65

2 3 10.90 0.60 0.35

Estimate for difference: 8.800

95% CI for difference: 6.498,11.102

T -Test of difference =0 (vs not = ):

T -Value =12.1 P -Value =0.001 DF=3

What conclusion do you draw about the two methods, and why? Interpret the given confidence interval. (Note: One of the article's authors indicated in private communication that they were unsure why the two methods disagreed.)

Is the response rate for questionnaires affected by including some sort of incentive to respond along with the questionnaire? In one experiment, 110 questionnaires with no incentive resulted in 75 being returned, whereas 98 questionnaires that included a chance to win a lottery yielded 66 responses ("'Charities, No; Lotteries, No; Cash, Yes," Public Opinion Quarterly, 1996: 542โ€“562). Does this data suggest that including an incentive increases the likelihood of a response? State and test the relevant hypotheses at significance level . 10 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free