Shoveling is not exactly a high-tech activity, but it will continue to be a required task even in our information age. The article "A Shovel with a Perforated Blade Reduces Energy Expenditure Required for Digging Wet Clay" (Human Factors, 2010: 492-502) reported on an experiment in which 13 workers were each provided with both a conventional shovel and a shovel whose blade was perforated with small holes. The authors of the cited article provided the following data on stable energy expenditure ((kcal/kg(subject)//b(clay)):
Worker : 1 2 3 4
Conventional : .0011 .0014 .0018 .0022
Perforated : .0011 .0010 .0019 .0013
Worker: 5 6 7
Conventional : .0010 .0016 .0028
Perforated : .0011 .0017 .0024
Worker 8 9 10
Conventional : .0020 .0015 .0014
Perforated : .0020 .0013 .0013
Worker: 11 12 13
Conventional : .0023 .0017 .0020
Perforated : .0017 .0015 .0013
a. Calculate a confidence interval at the 95 % confidence level for the true average difference between energy expenditure for the conventional shovel and the perforated shovel (the relevant normal probability plot shows a reasonably linear pattern). Based on this interval, does it appear that the shovels differ with respect to true average energy expenditure? Explain.
b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05 to see if true average energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel.