Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Do teachers find their work rewarding and satisfying? The article "Work-Related Attitudes" (Psychological Reports, 1991: \(443 - 450)\)reports the results of a survey of 395 elementary school teachers and 266 high school teachers. Of the elementary school teachers, 224 said they were very satisfied with their jobs, whereas 126 of the high school teachers were very satisfied with their work. Estimate the difference between the proportion of all elementary school teachers who are very satisfied and all high school teachers who are very satisfied by calculating and interpreting a\(CI\).

Short Answer

Expert verified

(0.016, 0.171)

Step by step solution

01

To estimate the difference between the proportion of all elementary school and all high school teachers who are very satisfied  

A confidence interval for \({p_1} - {p_2}\)with confidence level of approximately \(100(1 - \alpha )\% \) is

\({\hat p_1} - {\hat p_2} \pm {z_{\alpha /2}} \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1}{{\hat q}_1}}}{m} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2}{{\hat q}_2}}}{n}} \)

The confidence interval can be used when\(m \cdot {\hat p_1},m \cdot {\hat q_1},n \cdot {\hat p_1}\), and \(n \cdot {\hat q_1}\) are at least 10

There are \(m = 395\) elementary school teachers and \(n = 266\) high school teachers. There are 224 elementary school satisfied teachers with their job, thus

\({\hat p_1} = \frac{{224}}{{395}}\)

is the proportion, and 126 high school teachers satisfied with their job, thus

\({\hat p_2} = \frac{{126}}{{266}}\)

Therefore, the 95 % confidence interval is

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2} - {z_{\alpha /2}} \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1}{{\hat q}_1}}}{m} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2}{{\hat q}_2}}}{n}} ,{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2} + {z_{\alpha /2}} \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1}{{\hat q}_1}}}{m} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2}{{\hat q}_2}}}{n}} \\ = \frac{{224}}{{395}} - \frac{{126}}{{266}} - 1.96 \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{224}}{{395}} \cdot \frac{{171}}{{395}}} \;\;\;395 + \frac{{126}}{{266}} \cdot \frac{{140}}{{266}}\;\;\;266,\\ = \frac{{224}}{{395}} - \frac{{126}}{{266}} + 1.96 \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{224}}{{395}} \cdot \frac{{171}}{{395}}} \;\;\;395 + \frac{{126}}{{266}} \cdot \frac{{140}}{{266}}\;\;\;266\\ = (0.016,0.171).\end{array}\)

02

Final proof

(0.016, 0.171)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \({X_L},....,{X_m}\)be a random sample from a Poisson distribution with parameter\({\mu _1}\), and let \({Y_1},....,{Y_n}\)be a random sample from another Poisson distribution with parameter\({\mu _2}\). We wish to test \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\) against one of the three standard alternatives. When m and n are large, the large-sample z test of Section 9.1 can be used. However, the fact that \(V(\bar X) = \mu /n\) suggests that a different denominator should be used in standardizing\(\bar X - \bar Y\). Develop a large sample test procedure appropriate to this problem, and then apply it to the following data to test whether the plant densities for a particular species are equal in two different regions (where each observation is the number of plants found in a randomly located square sampling quadrate having area\(1\;{m^2}\), so for region 1 there were 40 quadrates in which one plant was observed, etc.):

Damage to grapes from bird predation is a serious problem for grape growers. The article "'Experimental Method to Investigate and Monitor Bird Behavior and Damage to Vineyards" (Amer. \(J\). of Enology and Viticulture, 2004: 288-291) reported on an experiment involving a bird-feeder table, time-lapse video, and artificial foods. Information was collected for two different bird species at both the experimental location and at a natural vineyard setting. Consider the following data on time (sec) spent on a single visit to the location.

\(\begin{array}{l}Species Location n \overline x SEmean\\Blackbirds Exptl 65 13.4 2.05 \\Blackbirds Natural 50 9.7 1.76\\Silvereyes Exptl 34 49.4 4.78\\Silvereyes Natural 46 38.4 5.06\end{array}\)

a. Calculate an upper confidence bound for the true average time that blackbirds spend on a single visit at the experimental location.

b. Does it appear that true average time spent by blackbirds at the experimental location exceeds the true average time birds of this type spend at the natural location? Carry out a test of appropriate hypotheses.

c. Estimate the difference between the true average time blackbirds spend at the natural location and true average time that silvereyes spend at the natural

Torsion during hip external rotation (ER) and extension may be responsible for certain kinds of injuries in golfers and other athletes. The article "Hip Rotational Velocities During the Full Golf Swing" (J. of Sports Science and Medicine, 2009: 296-299) reported on a study in which peak ER velocity and peak IR (internal rotation) velocity (both in deg.sec\(^{ - 1}\)) were determined for a sample of 15 female collegiate golfers during their swings. The following data was supplied by the article's authors.

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{r}}{ Golfer }&{ \backslash multicolumn1c ER }&{ IR }&{ \backslash multicolumn1c diff }&{z perc }\\1&{ - 130.6}&{ - 98.9}&{ - 31.7}&{ - 1.28}\\2&{ - 125.1}&{ - 115.9}&{ - 9.2}&{ - 0.97}\\3&{ - 51.7}&{ - 161.6}&{109.9}&{0.34}\\4&{ - 179.7}&{ - 196.9}&{17.2}&{ - 0.73}\\5&{ - 130.5}&{ - 170.7}&{40.2}&{ - 0.34}\\6&{ - 101.0}&{ - 274.9}&{173.9}&{0.97}\\7&{ - 24.4}&{ - 275.0}&{250.6}&{1.83}\\8&{ - 231.1}&{ - 275.7}&{44.6}&{ - 0.17}\\9&{ - 186.8}&{ - 214.6}&{27.8}&{ - 0.52}\\{10}&{ - 58.5}&{ - 117.8}&{59.3}&{0.00}\\{11}&{ - 219.3}&{ - 326.7}&{107.4}&{0.17}\\{12}&{ - 113.1}&{ - 272.9}&{159.8}&{0.73}\\{13}&{ - 244.3}&{ - 429.1}&{184.8}&{1.28}\\{14}&{ - 184.4}&{ - 140.6}&{ - 43.8}&{ - 1.83}\\{15}&{ - 199.2}&{ - 345.6}&{146.4}&{0.52}\\{}&{}&{}&{}&{}\end{aligned}\)

a. Is it plausible that the differences came from a normally distributed population?

b. The article reported that mean\(( \pm SD) = - 145.3(68.0)\)for ER velocity and\( = - 227.8(96.6)\)for IR velocity. Based just on this information, could a test of hypotheses about the difference between true average IR velocity and true average ER velocity be carried out? Explain.

c. The article stated that " The lead hip peak IR velocity was significantly greater than the trail hip ER velocity\(\;\left( {p = 0.003, t value = 3.65} \right)\). "$ (The phrasing suggests that an upper-tailed test was used.) Is that in fact the case? (Note: "\(p = .033 \)in Table 2 of the article is erroneous.)

Consider the following two questions designed to assess quantitative literacy:

a. What is \[15\% \]of 1000?

b. A store is offering an \[15\% \]off sale on all TVs. The most popular television is normally priced at $1000. How much money would a customer save on the television during this sale?

Suppose the first question is asked of 200 randomly selected college students, with 164 answering correctly; the second one is asked of a different random sample of 200 college students, resulting in 140 correct responses (the sample percentages agree with those given in the article "Using the Right Yardstick: Assessing Financial Literacy Measures by Way of Financial Well-Being," J. of Consumer Affairs, 2013: 243-262; the investigators found that those who answered such questions correctly, particularly questions with context, were significantly more successful in their investment decisions than those who did not answer correctly). Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level 0.05 to decide if the true proportion of correct responses to the question without context exceeds that for the one with context.

Use the data of Exercise 19 to calculate a \(95\% CI\) for the difference between true average stopping distance for cars equipped with system \(1\) and cars equipped with system \(2\). Does the interval suggest that precise information about the value of this difference is available?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free