Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Lactation promotes a temporary loss of bone mass to provide adequate amounts of calcium for milk production. The paper "Bone Mass Is Recovered from Lactation to Postweaning in Adolescent Mothers with Low Calcium Intakes" (Amer. J. of Clinical Nutr., 2004: 1322-1326) gave the following data on total body bone mineral content (TBBMC) (g) for a sample both during lactation (L) and in the postweaning period (P).

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{Subject}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}\\1&2&3&4&5&6&7&8&9&{10}\\{1928}&{2549}&{2825}&{1924}&{1628}&{2175}&{2114}&{2621}&{1843}&{2541}\\{2126}&{2885}&{2895}&{1942}&{1750}&{2184}&{2164}&{2626}&{2006}&{2627}\end{array}\)

a. Does the data suggest that true average total body bone mineral content during postweaning exceeds that during lactation by more than\(25\;g\)? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of .05. (Note: The appropriate normal probability plot shows some curvature but not enough to cast substantial doubt on a normality assumption.)

b. Calculate an upper confidence bound using a\(95\% \)confidence level for the true average difference between TBBMC during postweaning and during lactation.

c. Does the (incorrect) use of the two-sample\(t\)test to test the hypotheses suggested in (a) lead to the same

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average total body bone mineral content during postweaning exceeds that during lactation by more than\(25\;{\rm{g}}\).

(b) \( - 45.5067\)

(c) Not the same conclusion

Step by step solution

01

A)Step 1: Find the difference

Determine the difference in value of each pair.

Sample 1

Sample 2

Difference D

1928

2126

-198

2549

2885

-335

2825

2895

-70

1924

1942

-18

1628

1750

-122

2175

2184

-9

2114

2164

-50

2621

2626

-5

1843

2006

-163

2541

26277

-86

02

Find the value of test statistics

Given claim: difference between \({\rm{P}}\) and \({\rm{L}}\) is more than \(25.\)

The claim is either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis state the opposite of each other. The null hypothesis needs to contain the value mentioned in the claim.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _d} = - 25\\{H_a}:{\mu _d} < - 25\end{array}\)

Determine the sample mean of the differences. The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values.

\(\bar d = \frac{{ - 198 - 336 - 70 + \ldots - 5 - 163 - 86}}{{10}} \approx - 105.7\)

Determine the sample standard deviation of the differences:

\({s_d} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{( - 198 - ( - 105.7))}^2} + \ldots + {{(86 - ( - 105.7))}^2}}}{{10 - 1}}} \approx 103.8450\)

Determine the value of the test statistic:

\(t = \frac{{\bar d - d}}{{{s_d}/\sqrt n }} = \frac{{ - 105.7 - ( - 25)}}{{103.8450/\sqrt {10} }} \approx - 2.457\)

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. The Pvalue is the number (or interval) in the column title of the Student's T distribution in the appendix containing the t-value in the row\(df = n - 1 = \$ \$ 10 - 1 = 9\) :

\(0.01 < P < 0.025\)

If the P-value is less than the significance level, reject the null hypothesis.

\(P < 0.05 \Rightarrow {\mathop{\rm Reject}\nolimits} {H_0}\)

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average total body bone mineral content during postweaning exceeds that during lactation by more than\(25\;{\rm{g}}\)

03

b)Step 3: Find the endpoint of confidence interval

\(c = 95\% = 0.95\)

Determine the\({t_{\alpha /2}}\)using the Student's T distribution table in the appendix with\(df = n - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9\):

\({t_{0.05}} = 1.833\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \cdot \frac{{{s_d}}}{{\sqrt n }} = 1.833 \cdot \frac{{103.8450}}{{\sqrt {10} }} \approx 60.1933\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for\({\mu _d}\)are:

\(\bar d + E = - 105.7 + 60.1933 = - 45.5067\)

Thus the upper confidence bound is\( - 45.5067\)

04

c)Step 4:

Find the standard deviaton

The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{1928 + 2549 + 2825 + \ldots + 2621 + 1843 + 2541}}{{10}} = 2214.8\\{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{2126 + 2885 + 2895 + \ldots + 2626 + 2006 + 2627}}{{10}} = 2320.5\end{array}\)

The variance is the sum of squared deviations from the mean divided by\(n - 1\). The standard deviation is the square root of the variance:

\(\begin{array}{l}{s_1} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(1928 - 2214.8)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(2541 - 2214.8)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}}} \approx 396.7327\\{s_2} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(2126 - 2320.5)}^2} + \ldots .. + {{(2627 - 2320.5)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}}} \approx 406.1445\end{array}\)

05

Find the test statisitc

Determine the test statistic:

\(t = \frac{{{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2} - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{2214.8 - 2320.5 - ( - 25)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{{396.7327}^2}}}{{10}} + \frac{{{{406.1445}^2}}}{{10}}} }} \approx - 0.449\)

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{{{396.7327}^2}}}{{10}} + \frac{{{{406.1445}^2}}}{{10}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {{{396.7327}^2}/10} \right)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {{{406.1445}^2}/10} \right)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}}}} \approx 17\)

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme. The P-value is the number (or interval) in the column title of Student's\(T\)distribution in the appendix containing the t-value in the row\(df = 17\):

\(P > 0.10\)

If the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, then the null hypothesis is rejected:

\(P > 0.05 \Rightarrow {\rm{ Fail to reject }}{H_0}\)

We then note that we made a different conclusion compared to part (a).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "The Influence of Corrosion Inhibitor and Surface Abrasion on the Failure of Aluminum-Wired Twist-On Connections" (IEEE Trans. on Components, Hybrids, and Manuf. Tech., 1984: 20-25) reported data on potential drop measurements for one sample of connectors wired with alloy aluminum and another sample wired with EC aluminum. Does the accompanying SAS output suggest that the true average potential drop for alloy connections (type 1) is higher than that wfor EC connections (as stated in the article)? Carry out the appropriate test using a significance level of .01. In reaching your conclusion, what type of error might you have committed?

(Note: SAS reports the\(P\)-value for a two-tailed test.)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ Type }&{}&N&{ Mean }&{ Std Dev }&{ Std Error }\\1&{20}&{17.49900000}&{0.55012821}&{0.12301241}&{}\\2&{20}&{16.90000000}&{0.48998389}&{0.10956373}&{}\\{}&{ Variances }&T&{ DF }&{Prob > |T|}&{}\\{ Unequal }&{3.6362}&{37.5}&{0.0008}&{}&{}\\{}&{ Equal }&{3.6362}&{38.0}&{0.0008}&{}\end{array}\)

The degenerative disease osteoarthritis most frequently affects weight-bearing joints such as the knee. The article "Evidence of Mechanical Load Redistribution at the Knee Joint in the Elderly When Ascending Stairs and Ramps" (Annals of Biomed. Engr., \(2008: 467 - 476\)) presented the following summary data on stance duration (ms) for samples of both older and younger adults.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{Age\;\;\;\;\;\;\;Sample Size\;\;Sample Mean\;\;Sample SD}\\{\;Older\;\;\;\;\;28\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;801\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;117}\\{Younger\;16\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;780\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;72}\end{array}\)

Assume that both stance duration distributions are normal.

a. Calculate and interpret a\(99\% \)CI for true average stance duration among elderly individuals.

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level\(.05\)to decide whether true average stance duration is larger among elderly individuals than among younger individuals.

Two different types of alloy, A and B, have been used to manufacture experimental specimens of a small tension link to be used in a certain engineering application. The ultimate strength (ksi) of each specimen was determined, and the results are summarized in the accompanying frequency distribution.

\(A\)

\({\bf{B}}\)

\(26 - < 30\)

6

4

\(30 - < 34\)

12

9

\(34 - < 38\)

15

19

\(38 - < 42\)

7

10

\(m = 40\)

\(m = 42\)

Compute a 95 % CI for the difference between the true proportions of all specimens of alloys A and B that have an ultimate strength of at least\(34ksi\).

An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity \(18Ni\) maraging steel with commercial-purity steel of the same type (Corrosion Science, 1971: 723โ€“736). For \(m = 32\)specimens, the sample average toughness was \(\overline x = 65.6\) for the high purity steel, whereas for \(n = 38\)specimens of commercial steel \(\overline y = 59.8\). Because the high-purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial purity steel by more than 5. Suppose that both toughness distributions are normal.

a. Assuming that \({\sigma _1} = 1.2\) and \({\sigma _2} = 1.1\), test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha = .001\).

b. Compute \(\beta \) for the test conducted in part (a) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 6.\)

Use the data of Exercise 19 to calculate a \(95\% CI\) for the difference between true average stopping distance for cars equipped with system \(1\) and cars equipped with system \(2\). Does the interval suggest that precise information about the value of this difference is available?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free