Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the pooled\(t\)variable

\(T = \frac{{(\bar X - \bar Y) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{{S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} }}\)

which has a\(t\)distribution with\(m + n - 2\)df when both population distributions are normal with\({\sigma _1} = {\sigma _2}\)(see the Pooled\(t\)Procedures subsection for a description of\({S_p}\)).

a. Use this\(t\)variable to obtain a pooled\(t\)confidence interval formula for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\).

b. A sample of ultrasonic humidifiers of one particular brand was selected for which the observations on maximum output of moisture (oz) in a controlled chamber were\(14.0, 14.3, 12.2\), and 15.1. A sample of the second brand gave output values\(12.1, 13.6\),\(11.9\), and\(11.2\)("Multiple Comparisons of Means Using Simultaneous Confidence Intervals," J. of Quality Technology, \(1989: 232 - 241\)). Use the pooled\(t\)formula from part (a) to estimate the difference between true average outputs for the two brands with a\(95\% \)confidence interval.

c. Estimate the difference between the two\(\mu \)'s using the two-sample\(t\)interval discussed in this section, and compare it to the interval of part (b).

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) \((\bar X - \bar Y) \pm {t_{\alpha /2}}{S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} \)

(b) \(( - 0.2423,3.6423)\)

(c) \(( - 0.3407,3.7407)\)

This confidence interval is slightly wider than the confidence interval found in part (b).

Step by step solution

01

a)Step 1: Find the standard deviation

(a) Given:

\(T = \frac{{(\bar X - \bar Y) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{{S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} }}\)

The t-value is the test statistic decreased by the mean, divided by the standard deviation:

\(\begin{array}{l}E(\bar X - \bar Y) = {\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\\V(\bar X - \bar Y) = {S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} \end{array}\)

The boundaries of the confidence interval are then the test statistic decreased/increased by the product of the critical t-value and the variance of the test statistic:

\((\bar X - \bar Y) \pm {t_{\alpha /2}}{S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} \)

02

b)Step 2: Find the mean and standard deviation

The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{14.0 + 14.3 + 12.2 + 15.1}}{4} \approx 13.9\\{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{12.1 + 13.6 + 11.9 + 11.2}}{4} \approx 12.2\end{array}\)

The variance is the sum of squared deviations from the mean divided by\(n - 1\). The standard deviation is the square root of the variance: \(\begin{array}{l}{s_1} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(14.0 - 13.9)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(14.0 - 13.9)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}}} \approx 1.2247\\{s_2} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(12.1 - 12.2)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(11.2 - 12.2)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}}} \approx 1.0100\end{array}\)

03

Step 3:

Determine the pooled standard deviation:

\({s_p} = \sqrt {\frac{{\left( {{n_1} - 1} \right)s_1^2 + \left( {{n_2} - 1} \right)s_2^2}}{{{n_1} + {n_2} - 2}}} = \sqrt {\frac{{(4 - 1){{1.2247}^2} + (4 - 1){{1.0100}^2}}}{{4 + 4 - 2}}} \approx 1.1225\)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom \(df = {n_1} + {n_2} - 2 = 4 + 4 - 2 = 6\) and in the column with \(1 - \) \(c/2 = 0.025\) in the Student's t distribution table in the appendix:

\({t_{\alpha /2}} = 2.447\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \cdot {s_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{1}{{{n_2}}}} = 2.447 \cdot 1.1225\sqrt {\frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{4}} \approx 1.9423\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\)are:

\(\begin{array}{l}\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - E = (13.9 - 12.2) - 1.9423 = 1.7 - 1.9423 = - 0.2423\\\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) + E = (13.9 - 12.2) + 1.9423 = 1.7 + 1.9423 = 3.6423\end{array}\)

04

C)Step 3: Determine the degree of freedom

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{{{1.2247}^2}}}{4} + \frac{{{{1.0100}^2}}}{4}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {{{1.2247}^2}/4} \right)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {{{1.0100}^2}/4} \right)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}}}} \approx 5\)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom\(df = 5\)and in the column with\(1 - c/2 = 0.025\)in the Student's distribution table in the appendix:

\({t_{\alpha /2}} = 2.571\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} = 2.571 \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{{{1.2247}^2}}}{4} + \frac{{{{1.0100}^2}}}{4}} \approx 2.0407\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\)are:

\(\begin{array}{l}\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - E = (13.9 - 12.2) - 2.0407 = 1.7 - 2.0407 = - 0.3407\\\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) + E = (13.9 - 12.2) + 2.0407 = 1.7 + 2.0407 = 3.7407\end{array}\)

We note that this confidence interval is slightly wider than the confidence interval found in part (b).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

According to the article "Modeling and Predicting the Effects of Submerged Arc Weldment Process Parameters on Weldment Characteristics and Shape Profiles" (J. of Engr. Manuf., \(2012: 1230 - 1240\)), the submerged arc welding (SAW) process is commonly used for joining thick plates and pipes. The heat affected zone (HAZ), a band created within the base metal during welding, was of particular interest to the investigators. Here are observations on depth\((mm)\)of the HAZ both when the current setting was high and when it was lower.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Non - high }&{1.04}&{1.15}&{1.23}&{1.69}&{1.92}\\{}&{1.98}&{2.36}&{2.49}&{2.72}&{}\\{}&{1.37}&{1.43}&{1.57}&{1.71}&{1.94}\\{ High }&{2.06}&{2.55}&{2.64}&{2.82}&{}\\{}&{1.55}&{2.02}&{2.02}&{2.05}&{2.35}\\{}&{2.57}&{2.93}&{2.94}&{2.97}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Construct a comparative boxplot and comment on interesting features.

b. Is it reasonable to use the two-sample \(t\) test to test hypotheses about the difference between true average HAZ depths for the two conditions?

c. Does it appear that true average HAZ depth is larger for the higher current condition than for the lower condition? Carry out a test of appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of . \(01\).

Many freeways have service (or logo) signs that give information on attractions, camping, lodging, food, and gas services prior to off-ramps. These signs typically do not provide information on distances. The article "Evaluation of Adding Distance Information to Freeway-Specific Service (Logo) Signs" \((J\). of Transp. Engr., 2011: 782-788) reported that in one investigation, six sites along Virginia interstate highways where service signs are posted were selected. For each site, crash data was obtained for a three-year period before distance information was added to the service signs and for a one-year period afterward. The number of crashes per year before and after the sign changes were as follows:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{Before:\;\;15\;26\;66\;115\;62\;64}\\{After:\;\;\;\;\;16\;24\;42\;80\;\;78\;73}\end{array}\)

a. The cited article included the statement "A paired\(t\)test was performed to determine whether there was any change in the mean number of crashes before and after the addition of distance information on the signs." Carry out such a test. (Note: The relevant normal probability plot shows a substantial linear pattern.)

b. If a seventh site were to be randomly selected among locations bearing service signs, between what values would you predict the difference in number of crashes to lie?

Adding computerized medical images to a database promises to provide great resources for physicians. However, there are other methods of obtaining such information, so the issue of efficiency of access needs to be investigated. The article "The Comparative Effectiveness of Conventional and Digital Image Libraries" J. of Audiovisual Media in Medicine, 2001: 8-15) reported on an experiment in which 13 computerproficient medical professionals were timed both while retrieving an image from a library of slides and while retrieving the same image from a computer database with a Web front end.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\;Subject\;\;\;\;\;1\;\;\;2\;\;3\;\;\;4\;\;\;5\;\;\;6\;\;\;\;\;7}\\{\;Slide\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;30\;35\;40\;25\;20\;30\;\;35}\\{\;Digital\;\;\;\;\;\;\;25\;16\;15\;15 10\;20\;\;\;7}\\{\;Difference\;\;5\;19\;25\;10\;10\;10\;28}\\{\;Subject\;\;\;\;\;8\;\;9\;\;10\;11\;12\;13}\\{\;Slide\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;62\;40\;51\;25\;42\;33\;}\\{Digital\;\;\;\;\;\;\;16\;15\;13\;11\;19\;19}\\{Difference\;46\;25\;38\;14\;23\;14}\end{array}\)

a. Construct a comparative boxplot of times for the two types of retrieval, and comment on any interesting features.

b. Estimate the difference between true average times for the two types of retrieval in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. Be sure to check the plausibility of any assumptions needed in your analysis. Does it appear plausible that the true average times for the two types of retrieval are identical? Why or why not?

Use the data of Exercise 19 to calculate a \(95\% CI\) for the difference between true average stopping distance for cars equipped with system \(1\) and cars equipped with system \(2\). Does the interval suggest that precise information about the value of this difference is available?

The invasive diatom species Didymosphenia geminata has the potential to inflict substantial ecological and economic damage in rivers. The article "Substrate Characteristics Affect Colonization by the BloomForming Diatom Didymosphenia geminata" (Acquatic Ecology, 2010:\(33 - 40\)) described an investigation of colonization behavior. One aspect of particular interest was whether the roughness of stones impacted the degree of colonization. The authors of the cited article kindly provided the accompanying data on roughness ratio (dimensionless) for specimens of sandstone and shale.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Sandstone: }&{5.74}&{2.07}&{3.29}&{0.75}&{1.23}\\{}&{2.95}&{1.58}&{1.83}&{1.61}&{1.12}\\{}&{2.91}&{3.22}&{2.84}&{1.97}&{2.48}\\{}&{3.45}&{2.17}&{0.77}&{1.44}&{3.79}\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Shale: }&{.56}&{.84}&{.40}&{.55}&{.36}&{.72}\\{}&{.29}&{.47}&{.66}&{.48}&{.28}&{}\\{}&{.72}&{.31}&{.35}&{.32}&{.37}&{.43}\\{}&{.60}&{.54}&{.43}&{.51}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

Normal probability plots of both samples show a reasonably linear pattern. Estimate the difference between true average roughness for sandstone and that for shale in a way that provides information about reliability and precision, and interpret your estimate. Does it appear that true average roughness differs for the two types of rocks (a formal test of this was reported in the article)? (Note: The investigators concluded that more diatoms colonized the rougher surface than the smoother surface.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free