Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

As the population ages, there is increasing concern about accident-related injuries to the elderly. The article "Age and Gender Differences in Single-Step Recovery from a Forward Fall" (J. of Gerontology, \(1999: M44 - M50\)) reported on an experiment in which the maximum lean angle-the farthest a subject is able to lean and still recover in one step-was determined for both a sample of younger females (\(21 - 29\)years) and a sample of older females (\(67 - 81\)years). The following observations are consistent with summary data given in the article:

YF:\(29,34,33,27,28,32,31,34,32,27\)

OF:\(18,15,23,13,12\)

Does the data suggest that true average maximum lean angle for older females is more than\(10\)degrees smaller than it is for younger females? State and test the relevant hypotheses at significance level . \(10\).

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average maximum lean angle for older females is more than degrees smaller than it is for younger females.

Step by step solution

01

Find the mean and standard deviation

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = 10\\{n_2} = 5\\\alpha = 0.10\end{array}\)

The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{29 + 34 + 33 + \ldots + 34 + 32 + 27}}{{10}} \approx 30.7\\{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{18 + 15 + 23 + 13 + 12}}{5} \approx 16.2\end{array}\)

The variance is the sum of squared deviations from the mean divided by\(n - 1\). The standard deviation is the square root of the variance:

\(\begin{array}{l}{s_1} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(29 - 30.7)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(27 - 30.7)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}}} \approx 2.7508\\{s_2} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(18 - 16.2)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(12 - 16.2)}^2}}}{{5 - 1}}} \approx 4.4385\end{array}\)

Given claim: more than \(10\)

The claim is either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis state the opposite of each other. The null hypothesis needs to contain the value mentioned in the claim.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 10\\{H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 10\end{array}\)

02

Find the test stastistic and degrees of freedom

Determine the test statistic:

\(t = \frac{{{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{30.7 - 16.2}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{{2.7508}^2}}}{{10}} + \frac{{{{4.4385}^2}}}{5}} }} \approx 6.691\)

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{{{2.7508}^2}}}{{10}} + \frac{{{{4.4385}^2}}}{5}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {{{2.7508}^2}/10} \right)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {{{4.4385}^2}/5} \right)}^2}}}{{5 - 1}}}} \approx 5\)

The \({\rm{P}}\)-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme. The \({\rm{P}}\)-value is the number (or interval) in the column title of Student's T distribution in the appendix containing the t-value in the row \(df = 5\) :

\(0.0005 < P < 0.001\)

If the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, then the null hypothesis is rejected:

\(P < 0.10 \Rightarrow {\rm{ Reject }}{H_0}\)

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average maximum lean angle for older females is more than degrees smaller than it is for younger females.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Head ability is the ability of a cylindrical piece of material to be shaped into the head of a bolt, screw, or other cold-formed part without cracking. The article "New Methods for Assessing Cold Heading Quality" (Wire J. Intl., Oct. 1996: 66-72) described the result of a head ability impact test applied to 30 specimens of aluminum killed steel and 30 specimens of silicon killed steel. The sample mean head ability rating number for the steel specimens was 6.43, and the sample mean for aluminum specimens was 7.09. Suppose that the sample standard deviations were 1.08 and 1.19, respectively. Do you agree with the article's authors that the difference in head ability ratings is significant at the 5% level (assuming that the two head ability distributions are normal)?

It is well known that a placebo, a fake medication or treatment, can sometimes have a positive effect just because patients often expect the medication or treatment to be helpful. The article "Beware the Nocebo Effect" (New York Times, Aug. 12, 2012) gave examples of a less familiar phenomenon, the tendency for patients informed of possible side effects to actually experience those side effects. The article cited a study reported in The Journal of Sexual Medicine in which a group of patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia was randomly divided into two subgroups. One subgroup of size 55 received a compound of proven efficacy along with counseling that a potential side effect of the treatment was erectile dysfunction. The other subgroup of size 52 was given the same treatment without counseling. The percentage of the no-counseling subgroup that reported one or more sexual side effects was 15.3 %, whereas 43.6 % of the counseling subgroup reported at least one sexual side effect. State and test the appropriate hypotheses at significance level .05 to decide whether the nocebo effect is operating here. (Note: The estimated expected number of "successes" in the no-counseling sample is a bit shy of 10, but not by enough to be of great concern (some sources use a less conservative cutoff of 5 rather than 10).)

Using the traditional formula, a \(95\% \) CI for \({p_1} - {p_2}\)is to be constructed based on equal sample sizes from the two populations. For what value of \(n( = m)\)will the resulting interval have a width at most of .1, irrespective of the results of the sampling?

Pilates is a popular set of exercises for the treatment of individuals with lower back pain. The method has six basic principles: centering, concentration, control, precision, flow, and breathing. The article โ€œEfficacy of the Addition of Modified Pilates Exercises to a Minimal Intervention in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trialโ€ (Physical Therapy, \(2013:309 - 321\)) reported on an experiment involving \(86\) subjects with nonspecific low back pain. The participants were randomly divided into two groups of equal size. The first group received just educational materials, whereas the second group participated in \(6\) weeks of Pilates exercises. The sample mean level of pain (on a scale from \(0\) to \(10\)) for the control group at a \(6\)-week follow-up was \(5.2\) and the sample mean for the treatment group was \(3.1\); both sample standard deviations were \(2.3\).

a. Does it appear that true average pain level for the control condition exceeds that for the treatment condition? Carry out a test of hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\) (the cited article reported statistical significance at this a, and a sample mean difference of \(2.1\) also suggests practical significance)

b. Does it appear that true average pain level for the control condition exceeds that for the treatment condition by more than \(1\)? Carry out a test of appropriate hypotheses

The accompanying data on response time appeared in the article "'The Extinguishment of Fires Using Low-Flow Water Hose Streams-Part II" (Fire Technology, 1991: 291-320).

Good visibility

.43 1.17 .37 .47 .68 .58 .50 2.75

Poor visibility

1.47 .80 1.58 1.53 4.33 4.23 3.25 3.22

The authors analyzed the data with the pooled t test. Does the use of this test appear justified? (Hint: Check for normality.

The z percentiles for n=8 are -1.53, -.89, -.49, -.15 , .15, .49, .89, and 1.53.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free