Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a psychiatric condition leading to substantial weight loss among women who are fearful of becoming fat. The article "Adipose Tissue Distribution After Weight Restoration and Weight Maintenance in Women with Anorexia Nervosa" (Amer. J. of ClinicalNutr., 2009: 1132-1137) used whole-body magnetic resonance imagery to determine various tissue characteristics for both an AN sample of individuals who had undergone acute weight restoration and maintained their weight for a year and a comparable (at the outset of the study) control sample. Here is summary data on intermuscular adipose tissue (IAT; kg).

Assume that both samples were selected from normal distributions.

a. Calculate an estimate for true average IAT under the described AN protocol, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimation.

b. Calculate an estimate for the difference between true average AN IAT and true average control IAT, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimation. What does your estimate suggest about true average AN IAT relative to true average control IAT?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) \(\;95\% \)confidence interval: \(({\bf{0}}.{\bf{38155}},)\)

(b) \(95\% \)confidence interval: \(( - 0.0045,0.3445)\)

The confidence interval suggest that there is no difference in the true average AN IAT compared to the true average control IAT.

Step by step solution

01

a)Step 1: Find the boundaries of confident intervals

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}n = 16\\\bar x = 0.52\\s = 0.26\end{array}\)

Let us assume that we want to calculate the confidence interval with\(95\% \)confidence (other confidence levels work similarly).

\(c = 95\% = 0.95\)Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom\(df = n - 1 = 16 - 1 = 15\)and in the column with\(1 - c/2 = \)\(0.025\)in the table of the Student's T distribution:

\({t_\alpha } = 2.131\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \times \frac{s}{{\sqrt n }} = 2.13 \times \frac{{0.26}}{{\sqrt {16} }} \approx 0.13845\)

The boundaries of the confidence interval then become: \(\begin{array}{l}\bar x - E = 0.52 - 0.13845 = 0.38155\\\bar x + E = 0.52 + 0.13845 = 0.65845\end{array}\)

02

B)Step 2: find the end point of the confidence interval

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 0.52\\{{\bar x}_2} = 0.35\\{n_1} = 16\\{n_2} = 8\\{s_1} = 0.26\\{s_2} = 0.15\end{array}\)

Let us assume that we want to calculate the confidence interval with\(95\% \)confidence (other confidence levels work sim

\(c = 95\% = 0.95\)

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer): \(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{{{0.26}^2}}}{{16}} + \frac{{{{0.15}^2}}}{8}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {{{0.26}^2}/16} \right)}^2}}}{{16 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {{{0.15}^2}/8} \right)}^2}}}{{8 - 1}}}} \approx 21\)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom \(df = 21\) and in the column with \(1 - c/2 = 0.025\) in the Student's \(t\) distribution table in the appendix:

\({t_{\alpha /2}} = 2.080\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} = 2.080 \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{{{0.26}^2}}}{{16}} + \frac{{{{0.15}^2}}}{8}} \approx 0.1745\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\) are:

\(\begin{array}{l}\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - E = (0.52 - 0.35) - 0.1745 = 0.17 - 0.1745 = - 0.0045\\\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) + E = (0.52 - 0.35) + 0.1745 = 0.172 + 0.1745 = 0.3445\end{array}\)

The confidence interval suggest that there is no difference in the true average AN IAT compared to the true average control IAT, because the confidence interval contains \(0\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "'Quantitative Assessment of Glenohumeral Translation in Baseball Players" (The Amer.J. of Sports Med., 2004: 1711-1715) considered various aspects of shoulder motion for a sample of pitchers and another sample of position players [glenohumeral refers to the articulation between the humerus (ball) and the glenoid (socket)]. The authors kindly supplied the following data on anteroposterior translation (mm), a measure of the extent of anterior and posterior motion, both for the dominant arm and the nondominant arm.

a. Estimate the true average difference in translation between dominant and nondominant arms for pitchers in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision, and interpret the resulting estimate.

b. Repeat (a) for position players.

c. The authors asserted that "pitchers have greater difference in side-to-side anteroposterior translation of their shoulders compared with position players." Do you agree? Explain.

Toxaphene is an insecticide that has been identified as a pollutant in the Great Lakes ecosystem. To investigate the effect of toxaphene exposure on animals, groups of rats were given toxaphene in their diet. The article "Reproduction Study of Toxaphene in the Rat" ( J. of Environ. Sci. Health, 1988: 101-126) reports weight gains (in grams) for rats given a low dose (4 ppm) and for control rats whose diet did not include the insecticide. The sample standard deviation for 23 female control rats was \(32\;g\) and for 20 female low-dose rats was\(54\;g\). Does this data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains? Assuming normality, carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05.

Reliance on solid biomass fuel for cooking and heating exposes many children from developing countries to high levels of indoor air pollution. The article โ€œDomestic Fuels, Indoor Air Pollution, and Childrenโ€™s Healthโ€ (Annals of the N.Y. Academy of Sciences, \(2008:209 - 217\)) presented information on various pulmonary characteristics in samples of children whose households in India used either biomass fuel or liquefied petroleum gas (\(LPG\)). For the \(755\) children in biomass households, the sample mean peak expiratory flow (a personโ€™s maximum speed of expiration) was \(3.30L/s\), and the sample standard deviation was \(1.20\). For the \(750\) children whose households used liquefied petroleum gas, the sample mean \(PEF\) was \(4.25\) and the sample standard deviation was \(1.75\).

a. Calculate a confidence interval at the \(95\% \) confidence level for the population mean \(PEF\) for children in biomass households and then do likewise for children in \(LPG\) households. What is the simultaneous confidence level for the two intervals?

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level \(.01\) to decide whether true average \(PEF\) is lower for children in biomass households than it is for children in \(LPG\) households (the cited article included a P-value for this test)

c. \(FE{V_1}\), the forced expiratory volume in \(1\) second, is another measure of pulmonary function. The cited article reported that for the biomass households the sample mean FEV1 was \(2.3L/s\) and the sample standard deviation was \(.5L/s\). If this information is used to compute a \(95\% \) \(CI\) for population mean \(FE{V_1}\), would the simultaneous confidence level for this interval and the first interval calculated in (a) be the same as the simultaneous confidence level determined there? Explain

Which way of dispensing champagne, the traditional vertical method or a tilted beer-like pour,preserves more of the tiny gas bubbles that improve flavor and aroma? The following data was reported in the article โ€œOn the Losses of Dissolved \(C{O_2}\) during Champagne Servingโ€ (J. Agr. Food Chem., 2010: 8768โ€“8775)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ Temp \left( {^^\circ C} \right)}&{ Type of Pour }&n&{ Mean (g/L)}&{ SD }\\{18}&{ Traditional }&4&{4.0}&{.5}\\{18}&{ Slanted }&4&{3.7}&{.3}\\{12}&{ Traditional }&4&{3.3}&{.2}\\{12}&{ Slanted }&4&{2.0}&{.3}\\{}&{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

Assume that the sampled distributions are normal.

a. Carry out a test at significance level \(.01\) to decide whether true average\(C{O_2}\)loss at \(1{8^o}C\) for the traditional pour differs from that for the slanted pour.

b. Repeat the test of hypotheses suggested in (a) for the \(1{2^o}\) temperature. Is the conclusion different from that for the \(1{8^o}\) temperature? Note: The \(1{2^o}\) result was reported in the popular media

The article "The Influence of Corrosion Inhibitor and Surface Abrasion on the Failure of Aluminum-Wired Twist-On Connections" (IEEE Trans. on Components, Hybrids, and Manuf. Tech., 1984: 20-25) reported data on potential drop measurements for one sample of connectors wired with alloy aluminum and another sample wired with EC aluminum. Does the accompanying SAS output suggest that the true average potential drop for alloy connections (type 1) is higher than that wfor EC connections (as stated in the article)? Carry out the appropriate test using a significance level of .01. In reaching your conclusion, what type of error might you have committed?

(Note: SAS reports the\(P\)-value for a two-tailed test.)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ Type }&{}&N&{ Mean }&{ Std Dev }&{ Std Error }\\1&{20}&{17.49900000}&{0.55012821}&{0.12301241}&{}\\2&{20}&{16.90000000}&{0.48998389}&{0.10956373}&{}\\{}&{ Variances }&T&{ DF }&{Prob > |T|}&{}\\{ Unequal }&{3.6362}&{37.5}&{0.0008}&{}&{}\\{}&{ Equal }&{3.6362}&{38.0}&{0.0008}&{}\end{array}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free