Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The National Health Statistics Reports dated Oct. \(22,2008\), included the following information on the heights (in.) for non-Hispanic white females:

Sample sample Std. Error

Age Size Mean Mean

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{20 - 39}&{866}&{64.9}&{.09}\\{60 and older }&{934}&{63.1}&{.11}\\{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

  1. Calculate and interpret a confidence interval at confidence level approximately \(95\% \) for the difference between population mean height for the younger women and that for the older women.
  2. Let \({\mu _1}\) denote the population mean height for those aged \(20 - 39\) and \({\mu _2}\) denote the population mean height for those aged 60 and older. Interpret the hypotheses \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1 and {H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 1,\) and then carry out a test of these hypotheses at significance level \(.001\)
  3. Based on the \(p\)-value calculated in (b) would you reject the null hypothesis at any reasonable significance level? Explain your reasoning.
  4. What hypotheses would be appropriate if \({\mu _1}\) referred to the older age group, \({\mu _2}\) to the younger age group, and you wanted to see if there was compelling evidence for concluding that the population mean height for younger women exceeded that for older women by more than \(1\)in.?

Short Answer

Expert verified

the solution is

a) \((1.5214,2.0786)\)

b) reject null hypothesis;

c) reject the null hypothesis at any reasonable significance level;

d) \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = - 1 versus {H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} < - 1\)

Step by step solution

01

find the population

a)

For sufficiently big m and n, the confidence interval for \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\) with a confidence level of about \(100\left( {1 - \alpha } \right)\% \) percent is.

\(\bar x - \bar y \pm {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n}} \)

An upper/lower bound is obtained by replacing \({z_{\alpha /2}}\) with \( {z_\alpha }\) and \( \pm \) with only \( + \) and \( - \).

The first sample has a sample size of \(m = 866 \), while the second sample has a sample size of \(n = 934\), both of which are large enough to employ the specified confidence interval.

For the first sample \((20 - 39)\), the standard error of the mean is,

\(\frac{{{s_1}}}{{\sqrt m }} = 0.09\)

while for the second sample (age 60 and older), it is.

\(\frac{{{s_2}}}{{\sqrt n }} = 0.11\)

It is necessary to obtain alpha and then \({z_{\alpha /2}}\) in order to obtain a confidence level of around \(95\% \).

\(100 \times (1 - \alpha ) = 95\)

\(\alpha = 0.05\) is the result of equation.

\({z_{\alpha /2}} = {z_{0.025}} = 1.96\)

As a result, the \(z\) value comes from the table in the book's appendix.

\(\bar x = 64.9,\;\;\;\bar y = 63.1\)

02

calculate the limit

Finally, for \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\), the \(95\% \) percent confidence interval can be calculated. This is the lower limit.

\(\begin{array}{l}\bar x - \bar y - {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n}} = 64.9 - 63.1 - 1.96 \times \sqrt {0.0{9^2} + 0.1{1^2}} \\ = 1.8 - 0.2786\\ = 1.5214.\end{array}\)

This is the upper limit.

\(\begin{array}{l}\bar x - \bar y + {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n}} = 64.9 - 63.1 + 1.96 \times \sqrt {0.0{9^2} + 0.1{1^2}} \\ = 1.8 + 0.2786\\ = 2.0786\end{array}\)

For \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\), the \(95\% \) percent confidence interval is.

\((1.5214,2.0786)\)

03

test the static value

b)

The hypothesis \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1\) can be translated as follows: the difference between the sample means is equal to one. The hypothesis \({H_1}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 1\) can be translated as: the difference in sample means is greater than \(1\).

When there is a null hypothesis.

\({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = {\Delta _0}\)

The test statistic value

\(z = \frac{{(\bar x - \bar y) - {\Delta _0}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n}} }}.\)

The $P$ value is derived for the acceptable alternative hypothesis by calculating the adequate area under the standard normal curve. When both \(m > 40 and n > 40\), this test can be employed.

Because both \(m\) and \(n\) are greater than \(40\), the test statistic described above can be utilized. The test statistic's value is.

\(\begin{array}{l}z = \frac{{(\bar x - \bar y) - {\Delta _0}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n}} }} = \frac{{64.9 - 63.1 - 1}}{{\sqrt {0.0{9^2} + 0.1{1^2}} }} = \frac{{0.8}}{{0.1421}}\\ = 5.63.\end{array}\)

The \(P\) value is the area under the standard normal curve to the right of \(Z\) in this one-sided test. The value of \(P\) is.

\(P(Z > 5.63) \approx 0\)

At any reasonable level

The null hypothesis is reject

Since

\(P < \alpha = 0.001\)

There is evidence to suggest that the difference in means is more than one.

04

calculate p-value

c)At any appropriate level, as stated in (b)

Reject the null hypothesis.

Since

\(P < \alpha \)

For any reasonable \(\alpha \)

d) \({H_0}\)would be the null hypothesis.

\({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = - 1\left( {{\mu _2} > {\mu _1} by 1 in. } \right) \)versus \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} < - 1\left( {{\mu _2}} \right.\)exceeds \({\mu _1}\) by more than \( 1 in.\)).

05

conclusion

a) \((1.5214,2.0786)\)

b) reject null hypothesis;

c) reject the null hypothesis at any reasonable significance level;

d) \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = - 1 versus {H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} < - 1\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The level of lead in the blood was determined for a sample of \(152\) male hazardous-waste workers ages \(20 - 30\) and also for a sample of \(86\) female workers, resulting in a mean \(6\) standard error of \(5.5 \pm 0.3\)for the men and \(3.8 \pm 0.2\) for the women (โ€œTemporal Changes in Blood Lead Levels of Hazardous Waste Workers in New Jersey, 1984โ€“1987,โ€ Environ. Monitoring and Assessment, 1993: 99โ€“107). Calculate an estimate of the difference between true average blood lead levels for male and female workers in a way that provides information about reliability and precision.

Using the traditional formula, a \(95\% \) CI for \({p_1} - {p_2}\)is to be constructed based on equal sample sizes from the two populations. For what value of \(n( = m)\)will the resulting interval have a width at most of .1, irrespective of the results of the sampling?

Shoveling is not exactly a high-tech activity, but it will continue to be a required task even in our information age. The article "A Shovel with a Perforated Blade Reduces Energy Expenditure Required for Digging Wet Clay" (Human Factors, 2010: 492-502) reported on an experiment in which 13 workers were each provided with both a conventional shovel and a shovel whose blade was perforated with small holes. The authors of the cited article provided the following data on stable energy expenditure ((kcal/kg(subject)//b(clay)):

Worker : 1 2 3 4

Conventional : .0011 .0014 .0018 .0022

Perforated : .0011 .0010 .0019 .0013

Worker: 5 6 7

Conventional : .0010 .0016 .0028

Perforated : .0011 .0017 .0024

Worker 8 9 10

Conventional : .0020 .0015 .0014

Perforated : .0020 .0013 .0013

Worker: 11 12 13

Conventional : .0023 .0017 .0020

Perforated : .0017 .0015 .0013

a. Calculate a confidence interval at the 95 % confidence level for the true average difference between energy expenditure for the conventional shovel and the perforated shovel (the relevant normal probability plot shows a reasonably linear pattern). Based on this interval, does it appear that the shovels differ with respect to true average energy expenditure? Explain.

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05 to see if true average energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel.

The article "Fatigue Testing of Condoms" cited in Exercise 7.32 reported that for a sample of 20 natural latex condoms of a certain type, the sample mean and sample standard deviation of the number of cycles to break were 4358 and 2218 , respectively, whereas a sample of 20 polyisoprene condoms gave a sample mean and sample standard deviation of 5805 and 3990 , respectively. Is there strong evidence for concluding that true average number of cycles to break for the polyisoprene condom exceeds that for the natural latex condom by more than 1000 cycles? Carry out a test using a significance level of 01 . (Note: The cited paper reported P-values of t tests for comparing means of the various types considered.)

Olestra is a fat substitute approved by the FDA for use in snack foods. Because there have been anecdotal reports of gastrointestinal problems associated with olestra consumption, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment was carried out to compare olestra potato chips to regular potato chips with respect to GI symptoms ("Gastrointestinal Symptoms Following Consumption of Olestra or Regular Triglyceride Potato Chips," J. of the Amer. Med. Assoc., 1998: 150-152). Among 529 individuals in the TG control group, 17.6 % experienced an adverse GI event, whereas among the 563 individuals in the olestra treatment group, 15.8 % experienced such an event.

a. Carry out a test of hypotheses at the 5 % significance level to decide whether the incidence rate of GI problems for those who consume olestra chips according to the experimental regimen differs from the incidence rate for the TG control treatment.

b. If the true percentages for the two treatments were 15 % and 20 %, respectively, what sample sizes

\((m = n\)) would be necessary to detect such a difference with probability 90?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free