Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The level of monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity in blood platelets (nm/mg protein/h) was determined for each individual in a sample of \(43\) chronic schizophrenics, resulting in \(\bar x = 2.69\) and \({s_1} = 2.30,\), as well as for \(45\) normal subjects, resulting in \(\bar y = 6.35\) and \({s_2} = 4.03.\). Does this data strongly suggest that true average MAO activity for normal subjects is more than twice the activity level for schizophrenics? Derive a test procedure and carry out the test using \(\alpha = .01\)

. (Hint: \({H_0}\) and \({H_a}\) here have a different form from the three standard cases. Let \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) refer to true average MAO activity for schizophrenics and normal subjects, respectively, and consider the parameter \(\theta = 2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\). Write \({H_0}\) and \({H_a}\) in terms of \(\theta \), estimate \(\theta \), and derive \({\hat \sigma _{\tilde \theta }}\) (“Reduced Monoamine Oxidase Activity in Blood Platelets from Schizophrenic Patients,” Nature, July 28, 1972: 225–226).) \(\alpha = .01\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

the solution is

There is insufficient evidence to support the idea that normal people' genuine average MAO activity is more than twice that of schizophrenics.

Step by step solution

01

find mean and variance

given

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 2.69\\{{\bar x}_2} = 6.35\\{s_1} = 2.30\\{s_2} = 4.03\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = 43\\{n_2} = 45\\\alpha = 0.01\end{array}\)

The sampling distribution of the sample mean \(\mu \) and standard deviation \(\frac{\sigma }{{\sqrt n }}:\)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{r}}{E\left( {{{\bar X}_1}} \right) = {\mu _1}}\\{E\left( {{{\bar X}_2}} \right) = {\mu _2}}\\{V\left( {{{\bar X}_1}} \right) = \frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{{{n_1}}}}\\{V\left( {{{\bar X}_2}} \right) = \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{{{n_2}}}}\end{array}\)

For linear combination \(W = a {X_1} + b {X_2}\) the following properties hold for the mean and variance:

\(E(W) = aE\left( {{X_1}} \right) + bE\left( {{X_1}} \right)\)

\(V(W) = {a^2}E\left( {{X_1}} \right) + {b^2}E\left( {{X_1}} \right)\left( { If {X_ - }1 and {X_ - }2} \right.\)are independent)

Let us define the statistic \(c\hat \theta = 2{\bar X_1} - {\bar X_2}\) for the parameter \(\theta = 2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\).

Determine its mean and variance

\(\begin{array}{l}E(\hat \theta ) = E\left( {2{{\bar X}_1} - {{\bar X}_2}} \right) = 2E\left( {{{\bar X}_1}} \right) - E\left( {{{\bar X}_2}} \right) = 2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\\V(\hat \theta ) = V\left( {2{{\bar X}_1} - {{\bar X}_2}} \right) = {2^2}V\left( {{{\bar X}_1}} \right) + {( - 1)^2}V\left( {{{\bar X}_2}} \right) = 4\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{{{n_2}}}\end{array}\)

The standard deviation is the square root of the variance:

\({\sigma _{\hat \theta }} = \sqrt {4\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \)

02

determine probability

Because the sample sizes are high, the sampling distributions of the sample means are about normal (by the central limit theorem), and so the sampling distribution of \(\hat \theta \) is also approximately normal.

We can utilize the \(z\)-test because the samples are large \(\left( {n > 30} \right)\). (instead of a t-test).

More for the normal subjects, according to the assertion \({X_2}\).

Either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis is the assertion. The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis are diametrically opposed. An equality must be present in the null hypothesis.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\\{H_a}:2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} < 0\end{array}\)

The test statistic's value is the statistic's value multiplied by its standard deviation divided by its mean:

\(z = \frac{{2{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2} - \left( {2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{4s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{2(2.69) - 6.35 - 0}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{4 \times 2.3{0^2}}}{{43}} + \frac{{4.0{3^2}}}{{45}}} }} \approx - 1.05\)

If the null hypothesis is true, the P-value is the chance of getting a value that is more extreme or equal to the standardized test statistic \(z\). Using the usual probability table, calculate the probability.

\({\rm{P = P(Z < - 1}}{\rm{.05) = 0}}{\rm{.1469}}\)

If the p-value is smaller than the significance level \(\alpha \), then the null hypothesis is rejected.

\(P > 0.01 \Rightarrow Fail to reject {H_0}\)

There is insufficient evidence to support the idea that normal people' genuine average MAO activity is more than twice that of schizophrenics.

03

conclusion

There is insufficient evidence to support the idea that normal people' genuine average MAO activity is more than twice that of schizophrenics.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Fusible interlinings are being used with increasing frequency to support outer fabrics and improve the shape and drape of various pieces of clothing. The article "Compatibility of Outer and Fusible Interlining Fabrics in Tailored Garments" (Textile Res. J., \(1997: 137 - 142\)) gave the accompanying data on extensibility\((\% )\)at\(100gm/cm\)for both high-quality (H) fabric and poor-quality (P) fabric specimens.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{r}}H&{1.2}&{.9}&{.7}&{1.0}&{1.7}&{1.7}&{1.1}&{.9}&{1.7}\\{}&{1.9}&{1.3}&{2.1}&{1.6}&{1.8}&{1.4}&{1.3}&{1.9}&{1.6}\\{}&{.8}&{2.0}&{1.7}&{1.6}&{2.3}&{2.0}&{}&{}&{}\\P&{1.6}&{1.5}&{1.1}&{2.1}&{1.5}&{1.3}&{1.0}&{2.6}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Construct normal probability plots to verify the plausibility of both samples having been selected from normal population distributions.

b. Construct a comparative boxplot. Does it suggest that there is a difference between true average extensibility for high-quality fabric specimens and that for poor-quality specimens?

c. The sample mean and standard deviation for the highquality sample are\(1.508\)and\(.444\), respectively, and those for the poor-quality sample are\(1.588\)and\(.530.\)Use the two-sample\(t\)test to decide whether true average extensibility differs for the two types of fabric.

The derailment of a freight train due to the catastrophic failure of a traction motor armature bearing provided the impetus for a study reported in the article "Locomotive Traction Motor Armature Bearing Life Study" (Lubrication Engr., Aug. 1997: 12-19). A sample of high-mileage traction motors was selected, and the amount of cone penetration (mm/ 10) was determined both for the pinion bearing and for the commutator armature bearing, resulting in the following data:

Motor

1 2 3 4 5 6

Commutator 211 273 305 258 270 209

Pinion 266 278 259 244 273 236

Motor

7 8 9 10 11 12

Commutator 223 288 296 233 262 291

Pinion 290 287 315 242 288 242

Motor

13 14 15 16 17

Commutator 278 275 210 272 264

Pinion 278 208 281 274 268

Calculate an estimate of the population mean difference between penetration for the commutator armature bearing and penetration for the pinion bearing, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimate. (Note: A normal probability plot validates the necessary normality assumption.) Would you say that the population mean difference has been precisely estimated? Does it look as though population mean penetration differs for the two types of bearings? Explain.

Suppose \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) are true mean stopping distances at \(50mph\) for cars of a certain type equipped with two different types of braking systems. Use the two-sample t test at significance level

t test at significance level \(.01\) to test \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = - 10\) versus \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} < - 10\) for the following data: \(m = 6,\;\;\;\bar x = 115.7,{s_1} = 5.03,n = 6,\bar y = 129.3,\;\)and \({s_2} = 5.38.\)

As the population ages, there is increasing concern about accident-related injuries to the elderly. The article "Age and Gender Differences in Single-Step Recovery from a Forward Fall" (J. of Gerontology, \(1999: M44 - M50\)) reported on an experiment in which the maximum lean angle-the farthest a subject is able to lean and still recover in one step-was determined for both a sample of younger females (\(21 - 29\)years) and a sample of older females (\(67 - 81\)years). The following observations are consistent with summary data given in the article:

YF:\(29,34,33,27,28,32,31,34,32,27\)

OF:\(18,15,23,13,12\)

Does the data suggest that true average maximum lean angle for older females is more than\(10\)degrees smaller than it is for younger females? State and test the relevant hypotheses at significance level . \(10\).

Using the traditional formula, a \(95\% \) CI for \({p_1} - {p_2}\)is to be constructed based on equal sample sizes from the two populations. For what value of \(n( = m)\)will the resulting interval have a width at most of .1, irrespective of the results of the sampling?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free