Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A mechanical engineer wishes to compare strength properties of steel beams with similar beams made with a particular alloy. The same number of beams, \(n\), of each type will be tested. Each beam will be set in a horizontal position with a support on each end, a force of \(2500lb\) will be applied at the center, and the deflection will be measured. From past experience with such beams, the engineer is willing to assume that the true standard deviation of deflection for both types of beam is \(.05in\). Because the alloy is more expensive, the engineer wishes to test at level \(.01\) whether it has smaller average deflection than the steel beam. What value of n is appropriate if the desired type II error probability is \(.05\) when the difference in true average deflection favors the alloy by \(.04in\).?

Short Answer

Expert verified

the solution is

\(n = 50\)

Step by step solution

01

standard normal distribution

The null hypothesis is \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\), \({\mu _2}\) with representing the true average of alloy and \({\mu _1}\)being the true average of steel beam. The type II error \(\beta \) for \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = {\Delta ^'}\) vary depending on the alternative hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis is \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 0\) and \({\Delta ^'} = 0.4, \), which indicates that the type II error is present

\(\beta \left( {{\Delta ^'}} \right) = \Phi \left( {{z_\alpha } - \frac{{{\Delta ^'} - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma }} \right)\)

Where

\(\sigma = \sqrt {\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{m} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{n}} \)

\({\sigma _1} = {\sigma _2} = 0.05\)and \(m = n\). The significance level is \(\alpha = 0.01,{z_\alpha } = {z_{0.01}} = 2.33\). Using the fact

\(\Phi (1.645) = 0.05\)

The following holds true, as determined by the table in the book's appendix.

\(\begin{array}{l}\beta \left( {{\Delta ^'}} \right) = \Phi \left( {{z_\alpha } - \frac{{{\Delta ^'} - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma }} \right)\\0.05 = \Phi \left( {{z_\alpha } - \frac{{{\Delta ^'} - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma }} \right) and 0.05 = \Phi (1.645)\\\Phi (1.645) = \Phi \left( {{z_\alpha } - \frac{{{\Delta ^'} - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma }} \right)\end{array}\)

The following is true because \(\Phi \) is a cdf of standard normal distribution.

\(\begin{array}{l}{z_\alpha } - \frac{{{\Delta ^'} - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma } = 1.645\\2.33 - \frac{{0.04 - 0}}{\sigma } = 1.28\\{\sigma ^2} = \frac{{0.0{4^2}}}{{{{(1.645 + 2.33)}^2}}}\end{array}\)

02

find n value

remember that

\(\sigma = \sqrt {\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{m} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{n}} ,\)

and

\({\sigma ^2} = \frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{m} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{n} = \frac{{0.0{5^2}}}{n} + \frac{{0.0{5^2}}}{n} = \frac{{0.0025 + 0.0025}}{n}\)

by substituting this, the following is true

\(\begin{array}{l}\frac{{0.0025 + 0.0025}}{n} = \frac{{0.0016}}{{{{(1.645 + 2.33)}^2}}}\\n = \frac{{(0.0025 + 0.0025) \times {{(2.33 + 1.645)}^2}}}{{0.0016}}\\n = 49.38\end{array}\)

However, because \(n\) must be an integer number (sample size), the required value of \(n\) is

\(n = 50\)

03

conclusion

\(n = 50\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The invasive diatom species Didymosphenia geminata has the potential to inflict substantial ecological and economic damage in rivers. The article "Substrate Characteristics Affect Colonization by the BloomForming Diatom Didymosphenia geminata" (Acquatic Ecology, 2010:\(33 - 40\)) described an investigation of colonization behavior. One aspect of particular interest was whether the roughness of stones impacted the degree of colonization. The authors of the cited article kindly provided the accompanying data on roughness ratio (dimensionless) for specimens of sandstone and shale.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Sandstone: }&{5.74}&{2.07}&{3.29}&{0.75}&{1.23}\\{}&{2.95}&{1.58}&{1.83}&{1.61}&{1.12}\\{}&{2.91}&{3.22}&{2.84}&{1.97}&{2.48}\\{}&{3.45}&{2.17}&{0.77}&{1.44}&{3.79}\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Shale: }&{.56}&{.84}&{.40}&{.55}&{.36}&{.72}\\{}&{.29}&{.47}&{.66}&{.48}&{.28}&{}\\{}&{.72}&{.31}&{.35}&{.32}&{.37}&{.43}\\{}&{.60}&{.54}&{.43}&{.51}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

Normal probability plots of both samples show a reasonably linear pattern. Estimate the difference between true average roughness for sandstone and that for shale in a way that provides information about reliability and precision, and interpret your estimate. Does it appear that true average roughness differs for the two types of rocks (a formal test of this was reported in the article)? (Note: The investigators concluded that more diatoms colonized the rougher surface than the smoother surface.)

According to the article "Modeling and Predicting the Effects of Submerged Arc Weldment Process Parameters on Weldment Characteristics and Shape Profiles" (J. of Engr. Manuf., \(2012: 1230 - 1240\)), the submerged arc welding (SAW) process is commonly used for joining thick plates and pipes. The heat affected zone (HAZ), a band created within the base metal during welding, was of particular interest to the investigators. Here are observations on depth\((mm)\)of the HAZ both when the current setting was high and when it was lower.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Non - high }&{1.04}&{1.15}&{1.23}&{1.69}&{1.92}\\{}&{1.98}&{2.36}&{2.49}&{2.72}&{}\\{}&{1.37}&{1.43}&{1.57}&{1.71}&{1.94}\\{ High }&{2.06}&{2.55}&{2.64}&{2.82}&{}\\{}&{1.55}&{2.02}&{2.02}&{2.05}&{2.35}\\{}&{2.57}&{2.93}&{2.94}&{2.97}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Construct a comparative boxplot and comment on interesting features.

b. Is it reasonable to use the two-sample \(t\) test to test hypotheses about the difference between true average HAZ depths for the two conditions?

c. Does it appear that true average HAZ depth is larger for the higher current condition than for the lower condition? Carry out a test of appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of . \(01\).

Refer back to the previous exercise.

a. By far the most frequently tested null hypothesis when data is paired is\({H_0}:{\mu _D} = 0\). Is that a sensible hypothesis in this context? Explain.

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses to decide whether there is compelling evidence for concluding that on average diagnosis occurs more than\(\;25\)months after the onset of symptoms.

The accompanying data consists of prices (\$) for one sample of California cabernet sauvignon wines that received ratings of 93 or higher in the May 2013 issue of Wine Spectator and another sample of California cabernets that received ratings of 89 or lower in the same issue.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ \ge 93:}&{100}&{100}&{60}&{135}&{195}&{195}&{}\\{}&{125}&{135}&{95}&{42}&{75}&{72}&{}\\{ \le 89:}&{80}&{75}&{75}&{85}&{75}&{35}&{85}\\{}&{65}&{45}&{100}&{28}&{38}&{50}&{28}\end{array}\)

Assume that these are both random samples of prices from the population of all wines recently reviewed that received ratings of at least 93 and at most 89 , respectively.

a. Investigate the plausibility of assuming that both sampled populations are normal.

b. Construct a comparative boxplot. What does it suggest about the difference in true average prices?

c. Calculate a confidence interval at the\(95\% \)confidence level to estimate the difference between\({\mu _1}\), the mean price in the higher rating population, and\({\mu _2}\), the mean price in the lower rating population. Is the interval consistent with the statement "Price rarely equates to quality" made by a columnist in the cited issue of the magazine?

Recent incidents of food contamination have caused great concern among consumers. The article "How Safe Is That Chicken?" (Consumer Reports, Jan. 2010: 19-23) reported that 35 of 80 randomly selected Perdue brand broilers tested positively for either campylobacter or salmonella (or' both), the leading bacterial causes of food-borne disease, whereas 66 of 80 Tyson brand broilers tested positive.

  1. Does it appear that the true proportion of noncontaminated Perdue broilers differs from that for the Tyson brand? Carry out a test of hypotheses using a significance level .01.
  2. If the true proportions of non-contaminated chickens for the Perdue and Tyson brands are .50 and .25, respectively, how likely is it that the null hypothesis of equal proportions will be rejected when a .01 significance level is used and the sample sizes are both 80?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free