Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The accompanying summary data on total cholesterol level (mmol/l) was obtained from a sample of Asian postmenopausal women who were vegans and another sample of such women who were omnivores (“Vegetarianism, Bone Loss, and Vitamin D: A Longitudinal Study in Asian Vegans and Non-Vegans,” European J. of Clinical Nutr., 2012: 75–82)

Diet sample sample sample

Size mean SD

\(\overline {\underline {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Vegan }&{88}&{5.10}&{1.07}\\{ Omnivore }&{93}&{5.55}&{1.10}\\{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}} } \)

Calculate and interpret a \(99\% \) \(CI\) for the difference between population mean total cholesterol level for vegans and population mean total cholesterol level for omnivores (the cited article included a \(95\% \)\(CI\)). (Note: The article described a more sophisticated statistical analysis for investigating bone density loss taking into account other characteristics (“covariates”) such as age, body weight, and various nutritional factors; the resulting CI included 0, suggesting no diet effect.

Short Answer

Expert verified

the solution is

\(( - 0.8654, - 0.0346)\)

The genuine difference between the population mean total cholesterol level for vegans and the population mean total cholesterol level for omnivores is between\( - 0.8654mmol/l\)and\( - 0.0346mmol/l\), according to our\(99\)percent confidence level.

Step by step solution

01

given

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 5.10\\{{\bar x}_2} = 5.55\\{s_1} = 1.07\\{s_2} = 1.10\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = 88\\{n_2} = 93\\c = 99\% = 0.99\end{array}\)

02

confidence interval

Determine \({z_{\alpha /2}} = {z_{0.005}}\) using the normal probability table (search up \(0.005\) in the table, then the \(z\)-score is the discovered \(z\)-score with opposite sign) with confidence level \(1 - \alpha = 0.99\):

\({z_{\alpha /2}} = 2.575\)

Because \(0.005\) is exactly in the middle of \(0.0049\) and \(0.0051.\), we choose the average of \(2.57\)and \(2.58\).

As a result, the error margin is:

\(E = {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sqrt {\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} = 2.575 \times \sqrt {\frac{{1.0{7^2}}}{{88}} + \frac{{1.1{0^2}}}{{93}}} \approx 0.4154\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\)

\(\begin{array}{l}\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - E = (5.10 - 5.55) - 0.4154 = - 0.45 - 0.4116 = - 0.8654\\\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) + E = (5.10 - 5.55) + 0.4154 = - 0.45 + 0.4116 = - 0.0346\end{array}\)

The genuine difference between the population mean total cholesterol level for vegans and the population mean total cholesterol level for omnivores is between \( - 0.8654mmol/l\) and \( - 0.0346mmol/l\), according to our \(99\) percent confidence level.

03

conclusion

\(( - 0.8654, - 0.0346)\)

The genuine difference between the population mean total cholesterol level for vegans and the population mean total cholesterol level for omnivores is between \( - 0.8654mmol/l\)and \( - 0.0346mmol/l\), according to our \(99\)percent confidence level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the pooled\(t\)variable

\(T = \frac{{(\bar X - \bar Y) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{{S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} }}\)

which has a\(t\)distribution with\(m + n - 2\)df when both population distributions are normal with\({\sigma _1} = {\sigma _2}\)(see the Pooled\(t\)Procedures subsection for a description of\({S_p}\)).

a. Use this\(t\)variable to obtain a pooled\(t\)confidence interval formula for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\).

b. A sample of ultrasonic humidifiers of one particular brand was selected for which the observations on maximum output of moisture (oz) in a controlled chamber were\(14.0, 14.3, 12.2\), and 15.1. A sample of the second brand gave output values\(12.1, 13.6\),\(11.9\), and\(11.2\)("Multiple Comparisons of Means Using Simultaneous Confidence Intervals," J. of Quality Technology, \(1989: 232 - 241\)). Use the pooled\(t\)formula from part (a) to estimate the difference between true average outputs for the two brands with a\(95\% \)confidence interval.

c. Estimate the difference between the two\(\mu \)'s using the two-sample\(t\)interval discussed in this section, and compare it to the interval of part (b).

How does energy intake compare to energy expenditure? One aspect of this issue was considered in the article “Measurement of Total Energy Expenditure by the Doubly Labelled Water Method in Professional Soccer Players” (J. of Sports Sciences, 2002: 391–397), which contained the accompanying data (MJ/day).

Test to see whether there is a significant difference between intake and expenditure. Does the conclusion depend on whether a significance level of .05, .01, or .001 is used?

In medical investigations, the ratio \(\theta = {p_1}/{p_2}\)is often of more interest than the difference \({p_1} - {p_2}\)(e.g., individuals given treatment 1 are how many times as likely to recover as those given treatment\(2?)\). Let\(\hat \theta = {\hat p_1}/{\hat p_2}\). When \(m\)and n are both large, the statistic \(ln(\theta )\)has approximately a normal distribution with approximate mean value \(ln(\theta )\)and approximate standard deviation \({[(m - x)/(mx) + (n - y)/(ny)]^{1/2}}.\)

  1. Use these facts to obtain a large-sample 95 % CI formula for estimating\(ln(\theta )\), and then a CI for \(\theta \)itself.
  2. Return to the heart-attack data of Example 1.3, and calculate an interval of plausible values for \(\theta \)at the 95 % confidence level. What does this interval suggest about the efficacy of the aspirin treatment?

As the population ages, there is increasing concern about accident-related injuries to the elderly. The article "Age and Gender Differences in Single-Step Recovery from a Forward Fall" (J. of Gerontology, \(1999: M44 - M50\)) reported on an experiment in which the maximum lean angle-the farthest a subject is able to lean and still recover in one step-was determined for both a sample of younger females (\(21 - 29\)years) and a sample of older females (\(67 - 81\)years). The following observations are consistent with summary data given in the article:

YF:\(29,34,33,27,28,32,31,34,32,27\)

OF:\(18,15,23,13,12\)

Does the data suggest that true average maximum lean angle for older females is more than\(10\)degrees smaller than it is for younger females? State and test the relevant hypotheses at significance level . \(10\).

Reconsider the data of Example \(9.6\), and calculate a \(95\% \)upper confidence bound for the ratio of the standard deviation of the triacetate porosity distribution to that of the cotton porosity distribution.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free