Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The level of lead in the blood was determined for a sample of \(152\) male hazardous-waste workers ages \(20 - 30\) and also for a sample of \(86\) female workers, resulting in a mean \(6\) standard error of \(5.5 \pm 0.3\)for the men and \(3.8 \pm 0.2\) for the women (“Temporal Changes in Blood Lead Levels of Hazardous Waste Workers in New Jersey, 1984–1987,” Environ. Monitoring and Assessment, 1993: 99–107). Calculate an estimate of the difference between true average blood lead levels for male and female workers in a way that provides information about reliability and precision.

Short Answer

Expert verified

the solution is \({\rm{(0}}{\rm{.99,2}}{\rm{.41)}}\)

Step by step solution

01

calculate the difference between average blood level male and female workers

The confidence interval for \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\) with a confidence level of around \(100(1 - \alpha )\% \) percent is for \(m\), \(n\)large enough.

\(\bar x - \bar y \pm {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n}} \)

where \( + \) and \( - \) denote the interval's appropriate upper and lower limits. An upper/lower bound is obtained by substituting \({z_{\alpha /2}}\) with \({z_\alpha }\) and \( \pm \)with only \( + \) and \( - \).

Because both sample sizes are large enough, the confidence interval specified before can be employed. The stated information regarding the first sample is in the exercise.

\(\begin{array}{l}\bar x = 5.5\\S{E_1} = \frac{{s_1^2}}{m} = 0.{3^2}\end{array}\)

And about the second sample are

\(\begin{array}{l}\bar y = 3.8\\S{E_2} = \frac{{s_2^2}}{n} = 0.{2^2}\end{array}\)

Using confidence level of \(\alpha = 0.05\), the \( z\) value is \({z_{\alpha /2}} = {z_{0.025}} = 1.96\). The \( 95\% \)confidence interval becomes

\(\begin{array}{l}\bar x - \bar y \pm {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n}} = 5.5 - 3.8 \pm 1.96 \times \sqrt {0.{3^2} + 0.{2^2}} \\ = (0.99,2.41).\end{array}\)

The genuine average blood lead level for male workers is somewhere between \({\rm{0}}{\rm{.99}}\) and greater than the average for female workers, according to \(95\) confidence.

02

conclusion

the final solution is

\({\rm{(0}}{\rm{.99,2}}{\rm{.41)}}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

To decide whether two different types of steel have the same true average fracture toughness values, n specimens of each type are tested, yielding the following results:

\(\begin{array}{l}\underline {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ Type }&{ Sample Average }&{ Sample SD }\\1&{60.1}&{1.0}\\2&{59.9}&{1.0}\\{}&{}&{}\end{array}} \\\end{array}\)

Calculate the P-value for the appropriate two-sample \(z\) test, assuming that the data was based on \(n = 100\). Then repeat the calculation for \(n = 400\). Is the small P-value for \(n = 400\) indicative of a difference that has practical significance? Would you have been satisfied with just a report of the P-value? Comment briefly.a

Wait staff at restaurants have employed various strategies to increase tips. An article in the Sept. 5, 2005, New Yorker reported that “In one study a waitress received 50% more in tips when she introduced herself by name than when she didn’t.” Consider the following (fictitious) data on tip amount as a percentage of the bill:

Introduction: \({\bf{m = 50,}}\overline {\bf{x}} {\bf{ = 22}}{\bf{.63,}}{{\bf{s}}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{ = 7}}{\bf{.82}}\)

No introduction: \({\bf{n = 50,}}\overline {\bf{y}} {\bf{ = 14}}{\bf{.15,}}{{\bf{s}}_{\bf{2}}}{\bf{ = 6}}{\bf{.10}}\)

Does this data suggest that an introduction increases tips on average by more than 50%? State and test the relevant hypotheses. (Hint: Consider the parameter \({\bf{\theta = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{ - 1}}{\bf{.5}}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{2}}}\)

Pilates is a popular set of exercises for the treatment of individuals with lower back pain. The method has six basic principles: centering, concentration, control, precision, flow, and breathing. The article “Efficacy of the Addition of Modified Pilates Exercises to a Minimal Intervention in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial” (Physical Therapy, \(2013:309 - 321\)) reported on an experiment involving \(86\) subjects with nonspecific low back pain. The participants were randomly divided into two groups of equal size. The first group received just educational materials, whereas the second group participated in \(6\) weeks of Pilates exercises. The sample mean level of pain (on a scale from \(0\) to \(10\)) for the control group at a \(6\)-week follow-up was \(5.2\) and the sample mean for the treatment group was \(3.1\); both sample standard deviations were \(2.3\).

a. Does it appear that true average pain level for the control condition exceeds that for the treatment condition? Carry out a test of hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\) (the cited article reported statistical significance at this a, and a sample mean difference of \(2.1\) also suggests practical significance)

b. Does it appear that true average pain level for the control condition exceeds that for the treatment condition by more than \(1\)? Carry out a test of appropriate hypotheses

How does energy intake compare to energy expenditure? One aspect of this issue was considered in the article “Measurement of Total Energy Expenditure by the Doubly Labelled Water Method in Professional Soccer Players” (J. of Sports Sciences, 2002: 391–397), which contained the accompanying data (MJ/day).

Test to see whether there is a significant difference between intake and expenditure. Does the conclusion depend on whether a significance level of .05, .01, or .001 is used?

Is the response rate for questionnaires affected by including some sort of incentive to respond along with the questionnaire? In one experiment, 110 questionnaires with no incentive resulted in 75 being returned, whereas 98 questionnaires that included a chance to win a lottery yielded 66 responses ("'Charities, No; Lotteries, No; Cash, Yes," Public Opinion Quarterly, 1996: 542–562). Does this data suggest that including an incentive increases the likelihood of a response? State and test the relevant hypotheses at significance level . 10 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free