Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The article "'The Accuracy of Stated Energy Contents of Reduced-Energy, Commercially Prepared Foods" (J. of the Amer. Dietetic Assoc.s 2010: 116-123) presented the accompanying data on vendor-stated gross energy and measured value (both in kcal) for 10 different supermarket convenience meals):

Meal: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Stated: 180 220 190 230 200 370 250 240 80 180

Measured: 212 319 231 306 211 431 288 265 145 228

Carry out a test of hypotheses to decide whether the true average % difference from that stated differs from zero. (Note: The article stated "Although formal statistical methods do not apply to convenience samples, standard statistical tests were employed to summarize the data for exploratory purposes and to suggest directions for future studies.")

Short Answer

Expert verified

Reject null hypothesis and conclude that true mean percentage difference between stated energy values and their measured energy value is not zero.

Step by step solution

01

To find the difference from that stated differs from zero.

Notice first that the true percentage differences needs to be tested; thus, first find all 10 percentage differences

- for every meal. The percentage can be computed using

\({x_i}{\rm{ = }}\frac{{{\rm{ Measured}}{{\rm{ }}_{\rm{i}}}{\rm{ - Stated}}{{\rm{ }}_{\rm{i}}}}}{{{\rm{ Stated}}{{\rm{ }}_{\rm{i}}}}},\quad i = 1,2, \ldots ,10.\)

\(\begin{array}{l}{x_1} = \frac{{212 - 180}}{{180}} = 0.1778 \approx 17.78\% ;\\{x_2} = \frac{{319 - 220}}{{220}} = 0.45 \approx 45\% ;\\{x_3} = \frac{{231 - 190}}{{190}} = 0.2158 \approx 21.58\% ;\\{x_4} = \frac{{306 - 230}}{{230}} = 0.3304 \approx 33.04\% ;\\{x_5} = \frac{{211 - 200}}{{200}} = 0.055 \approx 5.5\% ;\\{x_6} = \frac{{431 - 370}}{{370}} = 0.1649 \approx 16.49\% ;\\{x_7} = \frac{{288 - 250}}{{250}} = 0.152 \approx 15.2\% ;\\{x_8} = \frac{{265 - 240}}{{240}} = 0.1042 \approx 10.42\% ;\\{x_9} = \frac{{145 - 80}}{{80}} = 0.8125 \approx 81.25\% ;\\{x_{10}} = \frac{{228 - 180}}{{180}} = 0.2667 \approx 26.67\% ;\end{array}\)

02

To find the difference from that stated differs from zero.

The hypotheses of interest are\({H_0}:\mu = 0\)versus\({{\rm{H}}_{\rm{a}}}{\rm{:\mu }} \ne {\rm{0}}\)

where\(\mu \) is the true average of the percentage differences.

The normal probability plot suggests that the t-test can be used here (perhaps the normality is not one hundred percent sure, however use the t-test to obtain the result).

The t statistic value can be computed using formula

\(t = \frac{{\bar x - {\Delta _0}}}{{s/\sqrt n }}\)

The Sample Mean\(\bar x\)of observations\({x_1},{x_2}, \ldots ,{x_n}\)is given by

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar x = \frac{{{x_1} + {x_2} + \ldots + {x_n}}}{n}\\ = \frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{x_i}} \end{array}\)

The sample mean\(\bar x\)is

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar x = \frac{1}{{10}} \times (17.78 + 45 + \ldots + 26.67)\\ = 27.29\% \end{array}\)

The Sample Variance\({s^2}\)is

\({s^2} = \frac{1}{{n - 1}} \times {S_{xx}}\)

where

\(\begin{array}{c}{S_{xx}} = \sum {{{\left( {{x_i} - \bar x} \right)}^2}} \\ = \sum {x_i^2} - \frac{1}{n} \times {\left( {\sum {{x_i}} } \right)^2}\end{array}\)

The Sample Standard Deviations is

\(s = \sqrt {{s^2}} = \sqrt {\frac{1}{{n - 1}} \times {S_{xx}}} .\)

The sample standard deviation is

\(\begin{array}{l} = \sqrt {\frac{1}{{10 - 1}}\left( {{{(17.78 - 27.29)}^2} + {{(45 - 27.29)}^2} + \ldots + {{(26.67 - 27.29)}^2}} \right)} \\\\ = 22.12\% \end{array}\)

03

To find the test statistic

Thus, the t statistic value is

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{{27.29 - 0}}{{22.12/\sqrt {10} }}\\ = 3.9\end{array}\)

04

To find the P-value

The degrees of freedom are \(n - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9.\) The P value for the two-sided alternative hypothesis is two times the area under the \({t_9}\) curve to the right of \(|t|\)

\(\begin{array}{c}P = 2 \times P(T > 3.9)\\ = 2 \times 0.002\\ = 0.004\end{array}\)

Where the value was computed using a software (you can use the table in the appendix of the book).

\(Since \)\(P = 0.004 < \alpha \)

Where \(\alpha \) is any reasonable significance level, reject null hypothesis

05

Final conclusion

Since we reject the null hypothesis, the conclusion is that the true mean percentage difference between stated energy values and their measured energy value is not zero.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In medical investigations, the ratio \(\theta = {p_1}/{p_2}\)is often of more interest than the difference \({p_1} - {p_2}\)(e.g., individuals given treatment 1 are how many times as likely to recover as those given treatment\(2?)\). Let\(\hat \theta = {\hat p_1}/{\hat p_2}\). When \(m\)and n are both large, the statistic \(ln(\theta )\)has approximately a normal distribution with approximate mean value \(ln(\theta )\)and approximate standard deviation \({[(m - x)/(mx) + (n - y)/(ny)]^{1/2}}.\)

  1. Use these facts to obtain a large-sample 95 % CI formula for estimating\(ln(\theta )\), and then a CI for \(\theta \)itself.
  2. Return to the heart-attack data of Example 1.3, and calculate an interval of plausible values for \(\theta \)at the 95 % confidence level. What does this interval suggest about the efficacy of the aspirin treatment?

Consider the pooled\(t\)variable

\(T = \frac{{(\bar X - \bar Y) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{{S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} }}\)

which has a\(t\)distribution with\(m + n - 2\)df when both population distributions are normal with\({\sigma _1} = {\sigma _2}\)(see the Pooled\(t\)Procedures subsection for a description of\({S_p}\)).

a. Use this\(t\)variable to obtain a pooled\(t\)confidence interval formula for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\).

b. A sample of ultrasonic humidifiers of one particular brand was selected for which the observations on maximum output of moisture (oz) in a controlled chamber were\(14.0, 14.3, 12.2\), and 15.1. A sample of the second brand gave output values\(12.1, 13.6\),\(11.9\), and\(11.2\)("Multiple Comparisons of Means Using Simultaneous Confidence Intervals," J. of Quality Technology, \(1989: 232 - 241\)). Use the pooled\(t\)formula from part (a) to estimate the difference between true average outputs for the two brands with a\(95\% \)confidence interval.

c. Estimate the difference between the two\(\mu \)'s using the two-sample\(t\)interval discussed in this section, and compare it to the interval of part (b).

Example\(7.11\)gave data on the modulus of elasticity obtained\(1\)minute after loading in a certain configuration. The cited article also gave the values of modulus of elasticity obtained\(4\)weeks after loading for the same lumber specimens. The data is presented here. \(1\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{Observation}&{1 min}&{4 weeks}&{Difference}\\1&{10,490}&{9,110}&{1380}\\2&{16,620}&{13,250}&{3370}\\3&{17,300}&{14,720}&{2580}\\4&{15,480}&{12,740}&{2740}\\5&{12,970}&{10,120}&{2850}\\6&{17,260}&{14,570}&{2690}\\7&{13,400}&{11,220}&{2180}\\8&{13,900}&{11,100}&{2800}\\9&{13,630}&{11,420}&{2210}\\{10}&{13,260}&{10,910}&{2350}\\{11}&{14,370}&{12,110}&{2260}\\{12}&{11,700}&{8,620}&{3080}\\{13}&{15,470}&{12,590}&{2880}\\{14}&{17,840}&{15,090}&{2750}\\{15}&{14,070}&{10,550}&{3520}\\{16}&{14,760}&{12,230}&{2530}\end{array}\)

Calculate and interpret an upper confidence bound for the true average difference between\(1\)-minute modulus and\(4\)-week modulus; first check the plausibility of any necessary assumptions.

Quantitative noninvasive techniques are needed for routinely assessing symptoms of peripheral neuropathies, such as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The article "A Gap Detection Tactility Test for Sensory Deficits Associated with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome" (Ergonomics, \(1995: 2588 - 2601\)) reported on a test that involved sensing a tiny gap in an otherwise smooth surface by probing with a finger; this functionally resembles many work-related tactile activities, such as detecting scratches or surface defects. When finger probing was not allowed, the sample average gap detection threshold for\(m = 8\)normal subjects was\(1.71\;mm\), and the sample standard deviation was\(.53\); for\(n = 10\)CTS subjects, the sample mean and sample standard deviation were\(2.53\)and\(.87\), respectively. Does this data suggest that the true average gap detection threshold for CTS subjects exceeds that for normal subjects? State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of\(.01\).

Researchers sent 5000 resumes in response to job ads that appeared in the Boston Globe and Chicago Tribune. The resumes were identical except that 2500 of them had "white sounding" first names, such as Brett and Emily, whereas the other 2500 had "black sounding" names such as Tamika and Rasheed. The resumes of the first type elicited 250 responses and the resumes of the second type only 167 responses (these numbers are very consistent with information that appeared in a Jan. 15. 2003, report by the Associated Press). Does this data strongly suggest that a resume with a "black" name is less likely to result in a response than is a resume with a "white" name?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free