Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In a two-way layout with \(K\) observations in each cell (\(K \ge 2\)), construct a test of the null hypothesis that all the main effects for factor \(A\) and factor\(B\), and also all the interactions, are 0.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Reject \({H_0}\) if \(U_ * ^2 = \frac{{IJ(K - 1)\left( {S_A^2 + S_B^2 + {S_{{\rm{Int\;}}}}} \right)}}{{(IJ - 1)S_{{\rm{R{\o}id\;}}}^2}} \ge F_{IJ - 1,IJ(K - 1)}^{ - 1}\left( {1 - {\alpha _0}} \right)\)

Step by step solution

01

Definition for probability and statistics

  • Probability is concerned with forecasting the possibility of future events, whereas statistics is concerned with analysing the frequency of previous events.
  • Probability is largely a theoretical discipline of mathematics that investigates the implications of mathematical notions.
02

Determine the null hypothesis

  • Given: Two-way layout with \(K\)observations in each cell.
  • \(K = {\rm{ Number of repetitions }} = K\)
  • We are interested in testing whether the effects of both factors (\(A\)and\(B\)) are \(0\) , while the interactions are also zero.
  • \({H_0}:{\alpha _i} = {\beta _j} = {\gamma _{ij}} = 0{\rm{ for }}i = 1, \ldots ,I,j = 1, \ldots ,J{H_1}:{H_0}{\rm{ is not true}}\)
  • By the theorem for the two-way layout with \(K\)repetitions per cell, \(\frac{{S_{{\rm{Resid }}}^2}}{{{\sigma ^2}}}\)has the \({\chi ^2}\)distribution with \(IJ(K - 1)\)degrees of freedom, \(\frac{{S_A^2}}{{{\sigma ^2}}}\)has the \({\chi ^2}\)distribution with \(I - 1\)degrees of freedom, \(\frac{{S_B^2}}{{{\sigma ^2}}}\)has the \({\chi ^2}\)distribution with \(J - 1\)degrees of freedom, and \(\frac{{S_{{\rm{Int}}}^2}}{{{\sigma ^2}}}\)has the \({\chi ^2}\)distribution with \((I - 1)(J - 1)\)degrees of freedom.
  • Since\(\frac{{S_A^2}}{{{\sigma ^2}}},\frac{{S_B^2}}{{{\sigma ^2}}}\), and \(\frac{{{S_{Int}}^2}}{{{\sigma ^2}}}\)freedom are the sum of the degrees of freedom for each term).
  • \(\frac{{S_A^2 + S_B^2 + S_{{\rm{Int}}}^2}}{{{\sigma ^2}}} = \frac{{S_A^2}}{{{\sigma ^2}}} + \frac{{S_B^2}}{{{\sigma ^2}}} + \frac{{S_{{\rm{Int}}}^2}}{{{\sigma ^2}}}\~\chi _{(I - 1) + (J - 1) + (I - 1)(J - 1)}^2 = \chi _{IJ - 1}^2\)
  • Since the ratio of two chi-square distributed random variables is an\({\rm{F}}\)distributed random variable with the same degrees of freedom, we can use the test statistic \(U_*^2\)to test the hypotheses.
  • \(U_*^2\)Has the \({\rm{F}}\)distribution with \((IJ - 1)\)and \((IJ(K - 1))\)degrees of freedom if the null hypothesis \({H_0}\) is true.
  • \(\begin{array}{c}U_ * ^2 = \frac{{\left. {S_A^2 + S_B^2 + S_{{\rm{Int}}}^2} \right)(IJ - 1){\sigma ^2}}}{{\frac{{S_{{\rm{Resid}}}^2}}{{IJ(K - 1){\sigma ^2}}}}}\\ = \frac{{IJ(K - 1)\left( {S_A^2 + S_B^2 + {S_{Int}}} \right)}}{{(IJ - 1)S_{{\rm{Resid\;}}}^2}}\end{array}\)
  • We can then use the test statistic \(U_*^2\)to test the null hypothesis, where we will reject the null hypothesis \({H_0}\)when \(U_*^2\)is larger than or equal to the critical value\(F_{IJ - 1,IJ(K - 1)}^{ - 1}\left( {1 - {\alpha _0}} \right)\).
  • \({\rm{\;Reject\;}}{H_ - }0{\rm{\;if\;}}U_ * ^2 = \frac{{IJ(K - 1)\left( {S_A^2 + S_B^2 + {S_{{\rm{Int\;}}}}} \right)}}{{(IJ - 1)S_{{\rm{Resid\;}}}^2}} \ge F_{IJ - 1,IJ(K - 1)}^{ - 1}\left( {1 - {\alpha _0}} \right)\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider again the conditions of Exercise 12, For what value of the temperature \({\bf{x}}\) can the durability of a specimen of the alloy be predicted with the smallest M.S.E.?

Prove that\(\sum\limits_{{\bf{i = 1}}}^{\bf{n}} {{{\left( {{{\bf{c}}_{\bf{1}}}{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{i}}}{\bf{ + }}{{\bf{c}}_{\bf{2}}}} \right)}^{\bf{2}}}} {\bf{ = c}}_{\bf{1}}^{\bf{2}}\sum\limits_{{\bf{i = 1}}}^{\bf{n}} {{{\left( {{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{i}}}{\bf{ - \bar x}}} \right)}^{\bf{2}}}} {\bf{ + n}}{\left( {{{\bf{c}}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{\bar x + }}{{\bf{c}}_{\bf{2}}}} \right)^{\bf{2}}}\).

Consider again the conditions of Exercise 12, and suppose that it is desired to estimate the value of \(\theta = 5 - 4{\beta _0} + {\beta _1}\). Find an unbiased estimator \(\hat \theta \) of

\(\theta \). Determine the value of \(\hat \theta \)and the M.S.E. of\(\hat \theta \).

Consider again the conditions of Exercise 12, If a specimen of the alloy is to be produced at the temperature \({\bf{x}} = {\bf{3}}.{\bf{25}}\), what is the predicted value of the durability of the specimen, and what is the M.S.E. of this prediction?

Question: Consider a problem of simple linear regression as described in Sec.\({\bf{11}}{\bf{.2}}\) and let \({{\bf{R}}^{\bf{2}}}\), be defined by Eq.\({\bf{(11}}{\bf{.5}}{\bf{.26)}}\) of this section. Show that

\({{\bf{R}}^{\bf{2}}}{\bf{ = }}\frac{{{{\left( {\mathop {\sum {\left( {{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{i}}}{\bf{ - \bar x}}} \right)\left( {{{\bf{y}}_{\bf{i}}}{\bf{ - \bar y}}} \right)} }\limits_{{\bf{i = 1}}}^{\bf{n}} } \right)}^{\bf{2}}}}}{{\left( {\mathop {\sum {{{\left( {{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{i}}}{\bf{ - \bar x}}} \right)}^{\bf{2}}}} }\limits_{{\bf{i = 1}}}^{\bf{n}} } \right)\left( {\mathop {\sum {{{\left( {{{\bf{y}}_{\bf{i}}}{\bf{ - \bar y}}} \right)}^{\bf{2}}}} }\limits_{{\bf{i = 1}}}^{\bf{n}} } \right)}}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free