Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Prove that \({{\bf{\sigma }}^{{\bf{'2}}}}\), defined in Eq.\({\bf{(11}}{\bf{.5}}{\bf{.8)}}\)is an unbiased estimator of \({{\bf{\sigma }}^{\bf{2}}}\). You may assume that \({{\bf{S}}^{\bf{2}}}\)has a \({{\bf{X}}^{\bf{2}}}\) distribution with \({\bf{n - p}}\) degrees of freedom.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Using the statistic\(\frac{{{S^2}}}{{{\sigma ^2}}}\) follows a chi-square distribution with\(n - p\) degrees of freedom, and the fact that the expected value of a chi-square random variable is the number of its degrees of freedom, it is proved.

Step by step solution

01

Define linear statistical models

A linear model describes the correlation between the dependent and independent variables as a straight line.

\(y = {a_0} + {a_1}{x_1} + {a_2}{x_2} + \tilde A,\hat A1/4 + {a_n}{x_n}\)

Models using only one predictor are simple linear regression models. Multiple predictors are used in multiple linear regression models. For many response variables, multiple regression analysis models are used.

02

Step 2:Find the proof for unbiased estimator

We need to show that the statistic

\({\sigma ^{2}} = \frac{{{S^2}}}{{n - p}} = \frac{1}{{n - p}} \cdot \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^n {\left( {{Y_i} - {z_{i0}}{{\hat \beta }_0} - \ldots - {z_{i,p - 1}}{{\hat \beta }_{p - 1}}} \right)^2}\)

is an unbiased estimator of \({\sigma ^2}\).

\(\frac{{{S^2}}}{{{\sigma ^2}}}\)follows chi-square distribution with \(n - p\)degrees of freedom.

According to theorem \(8.2.1\),

\(E\left( {\frac{{{S^2}}}{{{\sigma ^2}}}} \right) = n - p\)

since the expected value of a chi-square random variable is actually the number of its degrees of freedom.

Therefore due to the linearity of the expectation,

\(E\left( {{S^2}} \right) = (n - p){\sigma ^2}\)

Dividing by \(n - p\)we obtain,

\(E\left( {\frac{{{S^2}}}{{n - p}}} \right) = {\sigma ^2}\)

\(E\left( {{\sigma ^{2}}} \right) = {\sigma ^2}\)

Hence we proved the given statement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider again the conditions of Exercise 12, and suppose that it is desired to estimate the value of \(\theta = 5 - 4{\beta _0} + {\beta _1}\). Find an unbiased estimator \(\hat \theta \) of

\(\theta \). Determine the value of \(\hat \theta \)and the M.S.E. of\(\hat \theta \).

Show that the least-squares line \({\bf{y = }}{{\bf{\hat \beta }}_{\bf{0}}}{\bf{ + }}{{\bf{\hat \beta }}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{x}}\)passes through the point\({\bf{(\bar x,\bar y)}}\).

Suppose that each of two different varieties of corn is treated with two different types of fertilizer in order to compare the yields, and that \(K\)independent replications are obtained for each of the four combinations. Let \({X_{ijk}}\)denote the yield on the \(K\)The replication of the combination of variety \(i\) with fertilizer\(j(i = 1,2;j = 1,2\);\(k = 1, \ldots ,K\)). Assume that all the observations are independent and normally distributed, each distribution has the same unknown variance, and \({\bf{E}}\left( {{{\bf{X}}_{{\bf{ijk}}}}} \right){\bf{ = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{{\bf{ij}}}}\)for \(k = 1, \ldots ,K.\) Explain in words what the following hypotheses mean, and describe how to carry out a test of them:

\({{\bf{H}}_{\bf{0}}}{\bf{:}}\;\;\;{{\bf{\mu }}_{{\bf{11}}}}{\bf{ - }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{{\bf{12}}}}{\bf{ = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{{\bf{21}}}}{\bf{ - }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{{\bf{22}}}}{\bf{, }}\)

\({H_1}\): The hypothesis \({H_0}\) is not true.

Suppose that in a problem of simple linear regression, a confidence interval with confidence coefficient \({\bf{1 - }}{{\bf{\alpha }}_{\bf{0}}}\)\(\left( {{\bf{0 < }}{{\bf{\alpha }}_{\bf{0}}}{\bf{ < 1}}} \right)\) is constructed for the height of the regression line at a given value of \(x\). Show that the length of this confidence interval is shortest when \({\bf{x = \bar x}}\).

Question: Consider a problem of simple linear regression as described in Sec.\({\bf{11}}{\bf{.2}}\) and let \({{\bf{R}}^{\bf{2}}}\), be defined by Eq.\({\bf{(11}}{\bf{.5}}{\bf{.26)}}\) of this section. Show that

\({{\bf{R}}^{\bf{2}}}{\bf{ = }}\frac{{{{\left( {\mathop {\sum {\left( {{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{i}}}{\bf{ - \bar x}}} \right)\left( {{{\bf{y}}_{\bf{i}}}{\bf{ - \bar y}}} \right)} }\limits_{{\bf{i = 1}}}^{\bf{n}} } \right)}^{\bf{2}}}}}{{\left( {\mathop {\sum {{{\left( {{{\bf{x}}_{\bf{i}}}{\bf{ - \bar x}}} \right)}^{\bf{2}}}} }\limits_{{\bf{i = 1}}}^{\bf{n}} } \right)\left( {\mathop {\sum {{{\left( {{{\bf{y}}_{\bf{i}}}{\bf{ - \bar y}}} \right)}^{\bf{2}}}} }\limits_{{\bf{i = 1}}}^{\bf{n}} } \right)}}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free