Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

If \(s_{1}=\sqrt{2}\), and $$s_{n+1}=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{s_{n}}} \quad(n=1,2,3, \ldots)$$ prove that \(\left\\{s_{n}\right\\}\) converges, and that \(s_{n}<2\) for \(n=1,2,3, \ldots .\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Prove that the sequence \(s_n\) converges and that \(s_n<2\) for all \(n=1,2,3,\ldots\), where \(s_1=\sqrt{2}\) and \(s_{n+1}=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{s_n}}\). Answer: The sequence \(s_n\) converges since it is both monotonic increasing and bounded above. Additionally, through mathematical induction, we have shown that \(s_n<2\) for all \(n=1,2,3,\ldots\).

Step by step solution

01

Prove the sequence is monotonic

Let's show that the sequence is increasing. For simplicity, let \(x = s_n\). Then \(s_{n+1} = \sqrt{2+\sqrt{x}}\). We want to show that, for any \(n\), \(s_{n} \leq s_{n+1}\). To do that, let's compare \(s_{n}\) and \(s_{n+1}\): $$s_n = \sqrt{2+\sqrt{s_{n-1}}} \leq \sqrt{2+\sqrt{s_{n}}} = s_{n+1}$$ To prove that, we need to demonstrate that the function \(g(x) = \sqrt{2+\sqrt{x}}\) is increasing for the values of \(x\) in our sequence. Let's take the derivative of the function \(g(x)\): $$\frac{d}{dx}g(x) = \frac{d}{dx}\sqrt{2+\sqrt{x}} = \frac{1}{4\sqrt{(2+\sqrt{x})^3}}$$ We can see that the derivative is always positive for \(x\geq 0\). Thus, the function \(g(x)\) is increasing for any given \(x\) in our sequence. Therefore, the sequence is monotonic (increasing).
02

Prove the sequence is bounded

Next, let's show that the sequence is bounded. We want to prove that there exists an upper bound \(M\) such that \(s_n \leq M\) for all \(n \geq 1\). We have: $$s_1 = \sqrt{2} < 2$$ Assume that \(s_n < 2\). Then, $$s_{n+1} = \sqrt{2+\sqrt{s_n}} < \sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}}$$ Now, let's show that \(\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} < 2\). Squaring both sides of the inequality, we get: $$2+\sqrt{2} < 4$$ $$\sqrt{2} < 2$$ which is true. Therefore, \(s_{n+1} < 2\). Hence, the sequence is bounded above by 2.
03

Use the Monotone Convergence Theorem

Since we have shown that the sequence \(s_n\) is both monotonic increasing and bounded above, we can apply the Monotone Convergence Theorem. This theorem states that a sequence that is monotonic and bounded converges to a limit. Thus, the sequence \(s_n\) converges.
04

Prove \(s_n

We already showed that the sequence \(s_n\) is bounded above by 2. Now, we need to prove that \(s_n<2\) for all \(n=1,2,3,\ldots\). We can use mathematical induction to prove this statement. Base case: For \(n=1\), \(s_1=\sqrt{2}<2\). So, the base case holds. Inductive step: Assume that \(s_n<2\) for some \(n\geq 1\). Then, as we previously demonstrated, $$s_{n+1} = \sqrt{2+\sqrt{s_n}} < \sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} < 2.$$ Thus, by mathematical induction, \(s_n<2\) for all \(n=1,2,3,\ldots\). In conclusion, the sequence \(s_n\) converges, and \(s_n<2\) for all \(n=1,2,3,\ldots\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Mathematical Sequences
A mathematical sequence is essentially an ordered list of numbers that often follows a specific rule or pattern. For instance, consider the sequence where each term is defined recursively by:

\[s_{n+1} = \sqrt{2+\sqrt{s_n}}\]
In this example, the initial term, \(s_1\), is \(\sqrt{2}\), and subsequent terms are formed by the rule given. Sequences can be finite or infinite, and depending on their characteristics, they can be categorized in different ways. Recognizing the nature of the sequence is pivotal for understanding its behavior, such as whether it converges or diverges.

One relevant kind of sequence that students often encounter is a monotonic sequence, which either never increases or never decreases. The sequence described above is shown to be monotonic by proving that each term is less than or equal to the next term. Since it always increases (or stays the same), it is specifically called a monotonically increasing sequence. This distinction is essential for predicting the behavior of the sequence as it progresses and is a step toward proving convergence using the Monotone Convergence Theorem.
Convergence of Sequences
The concept of convergence in mathematical sequences is a vital one, referring to the idea that as you move through the sequence, the terms become arbitrarily close to a certain number called the limit.

Specifically, a sequence \(\left\{s_n\right\}\) is said to converge to a limit \(L\) if for every positive number \(\epsilon\), no matter how small, there exists some point in the sequence beyond which all terms of the sequence are within \(\epsilon\) of \(L\). Symbolically, we represent this by:

\[\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}s_n = L\]
If you can find such a limit \(L\), then you can say the sequence converges to \(L\). To demonstrate convergence in the given sequence, we utilized the Monotone Convergence Theorem. As the name suggests, this theorem implies that if a sequence is monotonic and bounded, it must converge. After proving the sequence was both increasing and bounded above by 2, we utilized this theorem to conclude that the sequence indeed converges to some limit.
Bounded Sequences
A sequence is considered to be bounded if its terms stay within a fixed distance from a particular value, not venturing off towards infinity. More formally, a sequence \(\left\{s_n\right\}\) is said to be bounded above if there is some number \(M\) such that:

\[s_n \leq M\]
for all \(n\) in the sequence. If such an \(M\) exists, we can reassure ourselves that no matter how far out we go in the sequence, its values will never exceed \(M\).

Similarly, a sequence is bounded below if there's a number \(m\) serving as a lower limit. In the given problem, we proved that the sequence \(\left\{s_n\right\}\) was bounded above by 2, fulfilling the criteria necessary to use the Monotone Convergence Theorem. By demonstrating that \(s_n<2\) for all \(n\), we essentially showed the sequence will forever remain under this upper boundary, thus making it a bounded sequence. The bounded nature of sequences is a fundamental concept that intertwines with their convergence, as seen in the resolution of the exercise.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If \(\left\\{s_{k}\right\\}\) is a complex sequence, define its arithmetic means \(\sigma_{n}\) by $$\sigma_{n}=\frac{s_{0}+s_{1}+\cdots+s_{n}}{n+1} \quad(n=0,1,2, \ldots) .$$ (a) If \(\lim s_{n}=s\), prove that \(\lim \sigma_{n}=s\). (b) Construct a sequence \(\left\\{s_{n}\right\\}\) which does not converge, although \(\lim \sigma_{n}=0 .\) (c) Can it happen that \(s_{n}>0\) for all \(n\) and that lim sup \(s_{n}=\infty\), although lim \(\sigma_{n}=0\) ? ( \(d\) ) Put \(a_{n}=s_{n}-s_{n-1}\), for \(n \geq 1\). Show that $$s_{n}-\sigma_{n}=\frac{1}{n+1} \sum_{k=1}^{n} k a_{k} .$$ Assume that \(\lim \left(n a_{n}\right)=0\) and that \(\left\\{\sigma_{n}\right\\}\) converges. Prove that \(\left\\{s_{n}\right\\}\) converges. [This gives a converse of \((a)\), but under the additional assumption that \(\left.n a_{n} \rightarrow 0 .\right]\) (e) Derive the last conclusion from a weaker hypothesis: Assume \(M<\infty\), \(\left|n a_{n}\right| \leq M\) for all \(n\), and \(\lim \sigma_{n}=\sigma .\) Prove that \(\lim s_{n}=\sigma\), by completing the following outline: If \(m0\) and associate with each \(n\) the integer \(m\) that satisfies $$m \leq \frac{n-\varepsilon}{1+\varepsilon}

For any two real sequences \(\left\\{a_{n}\right\\},\left\\{b_{n}\right\\}\), prove that $$\limsup _{n \rightarrow \infty}\left(a_{n}+b_{n}\right) \leq \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \sup a_{n}+\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \sup b_{n},$$ provided the sum on the right is not of the form \(\infty-\infty\).

Let \(X\) be the metric space whose points are the rational numbers, with the metric \(d(x, y)=|x-y| .\) What is the completion of this space? (Compare Exercise 24.)

Let \(X\) be a metric space. (a) Call two Cauchy sequences \(\left\\{p_{n}\right\\},\left\\{q_{n}\right\\}\) in \(X\) equivalent if $$\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} d\left(p_{n}, q_{n}\right)=0$$ Prove that this is an equivalence relation. (b) Let \(X^{*}\) be the set of all equivalence classes so obtained. If \(P \in X^{*}, Q \in X^{*}\), \(\left\\{p_{n}\right\\} \in P,\left\\{q_{n}\right\\} \in Q\), define $$\Delta(P, Q)=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} d\left(p_{n}, q_{n}\right)$$ by Exercise 23, this limit exists. Show that the number \(\Delta(P, Q)\) is unchanged if \(\left\\{p_{n}\right\\}\) and \(\left\\{q_{*}\right\\}\) are replaced by equivalent sequences, and hence that \(\Delta\) is a distance function in \(X^{*}\). (c) Prove that the resulting metric space \(X^{*}\) is complete. (d) For each \(p \in X\), there is a Cauchy sequence all of whose terms are \(p ;\) let \(P\), be the element of \(X^{*}\) which contains this sequence. Prove that $$\Delta\left(P_{\nu}, P_{4}\right)=d(p, q)$$ for all \(p, q \in X .\) In other words, the mapping \(\varphi\) defined by \(\varphi(p)=P\), is an isometry (i.e., a distance-preserving mapping) of \(X\) into \(X^{\bullet}\). (e) Prove that \(\varphi(X)\) is dense in \(X^{*}\), and that \(\varphi(X)=X^{*}\) if \(X\) is complete. By \((d)\), we may identify \(X\) and \(\varphi(X)\) and thus regard \(X\) as embedded in the complete metric space \(X^{*}\). We call \(X^{*}\) the completion of \(X\).

Prove the following analogue of Theorem \(3.10(b):\) If \(\left\\{E_{a}\right\\}\) is a sequence of closed nonempty and bounded sets in a complete metric space \(X\), if \(E_{n} \supset E_{n+1}\), and if $$\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \operatorname{diam} E_{n}=0,$$ then \(\cap_{1}^{\infty} E_{n}\) consists of exactly one point.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free