Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(\mathfrak{A}\) be a ring, give a sentence \(\sigma\) such that \(\mathfrak{A} \models \sigma \Leftrightarrow \mathfrak{A}\) is an integral domain (has no divisors of zero).

Short Answer

Expert verified
\(\sigma\): No zero divisors, commutative, and multiplicative identity.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We need to find a logical statement (or sentence) \(\sigma\) that characterizes when a given ring \(\mathfrak{A}\) is an integral domain. An integral domain is a commutative ring with no zero divisors and with unity (1). Our task is to express these conditions as a logical sentence \(\sigma\).
02

Expressing No Zero Divisors

A ring \(\mathfrak{A}\) has no zero divisors if for all elements \(a, b\) in \(\mathfrak{A}\), \(ab = 0\) implies that either \(a = 0\) or \(b = 0\). This condition can be written as a logical sentence:\[ \forall a, b \in \mathfrak{A}, (ab = 0) \rightarrow (a = 0 \lor b = 0). \]
03

Expressing Commutativity and Unity

For a ring to be an integral domain, it also must be commutative and have a multiplicative identity (unity), usually denoted by 1. Commutativity can be described as:\[ \forall a, b \in \mathfrak{A}, ab = ba. \] And unity can be described as there exists an element \(1 \in \mathfrak{A}\) such that for all elements \(a\), \(a \cdot 1 = a\).
04

Constructing the Sentence \(\sigma\)

Combine all the necessary conditions into one logical sentence. Therefore, \(\sigma\) will include conditions for no zero divisors, commutativity, and existence of unity:\[ \forall a, b \in \mathfrak{A}, [(ab = 0 \rightarrow a = 0 \lor b = 0) \land (ab = ba)] \land \exists 1 \in \mathfrak{A}, \forall a \in \mathfrak{A}, (a \cdot 1 = a). \] This entire statement \(\sigma\) ensures that \(\mathfrak{A}\) is an integral domain.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Ring Theory
Ring theory is a fundamental concept in abstract algebra. It deals with structures known as rings, which generalize arithmetic operations. A ring is a set equipped with two binary operations: addition and multiplication. These operations must satisfy specific rules. Here are some critical properties of a ring:
  • Addition Associativity: For any elements \( a, b, c \) in the ring, \( (a + b) + c = a + (b + c) \).
  • Additive Identity: There exists an element 0 such that \( a + 0 = a \) for any element \( a \).
  • Existence of Additive Inverses: For every element \( a \), there is an element \(-a\) such that \( a + (-a) = 0 \).
  • Multiplication Associativity: The rule \( (a \cdot b) \cdot c = a \cdot (b \cdot c) \) holds for multiplication.
To understand rings better, it's essential to recognize that they form an algebraic system that includes numbers, matrices, polynomials, and more. Each of these meets the criteria, making them instances of rings.
Zero Divisors
Zero divisors are elements within a ring that produce zero when multiplied by another non-zero element. Finding zero divisors is crucial for identifying an integral domain. In more detail, a ring element \( a \) is a zero divisor if there exists another element \( b eq 0 \) such that \( a \cdot b = 0 \).
  • If a ring avoids having zero divisors, it will usually exhibit simpler arithmetic behavior.
  • When a ring has zero divisors, it cannot be an integral domain.
Zero divisors illustrate how certain combinations of elements within a ring can nullify each other, affecting the ring's overall structure and properties.
Commutative Ring
A commutative ring is a ring where the multiplication operation is commutative. This means that the sequence of multiplying two elements does not matter: \( a \cdot b = b \cdot a \) for any elements \( a \) and \( b \) in the ring. This property may seem straightforward, but it plays an essential role in simplifying many algebraic processes within the ring.
  • Examples of commutative rings include the set of integers, rationals, real numbers, and polynomials.
  • Within a commutative ring, polynomial expressions and their factorization become more predictable and manageable.
This predictability is one reason commutative rings are a cornerstone in algebra, especially in fields such as number theory and algebraic geometry.
Unity in Ring
Unity, also known as the multiplicative identity, is an element in a ring which, when multiplied by any element of the ring, yields that element unchanged. This element is commonly denoted as 1. Unity plays a pivotal role in defining particular types of rings, like integral domains.
  • An integral domain must have unity, which differentiates it from more general ring structures that might not have a multiplicative identity.
  • The presence of unity ensures every element in the ring has an associated element (1) ensuring the multiplicative operation respects the element itself.
For any element \( a \) in a ring, the equality \( a \cdot 1 = a \) must hold. This property backs further algebraic laws and operations within a ring, making the structure well-suited for many mathematical applications.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show \(\not \models \exists x \varphi \rightarrow \forall x \varphi\).

Consider \(\sigma_{1}=\forall x(x \sim x), \sigma_{2}=\forall x y(x \sim y \rightarrow y \sim x), \sigma_{3}=\forall x y z(x \sim\) \(y \wedge y \sim z \rightarrow x \sim z\) ). Show that if \(\mathfrak{Q} \models \sigma_{1} \wedge \sigma_{2} \wedge \sigma_{3}\), where \mathfrak{ } \(=\langle A, R)\), then \(R\) is an equivalence relation. N.B. \(x \sim y\) is a suggestive notation for the atom \(\bar{R}(x, y)\).

Monadic predicate calculus has only unary predicate symbols (no identity). Consider \(\mathfrak{A}=\left\langle A, R_{1}, \ldots, R_{n}\right\rangle\) where all \(R_{i}\) are sets. Define \(a \sim\) \(b:=a \in R_{i} \Leftrightarrow b \in R_{i}\) for all \(i \leq n\). Show that \(\sim\) is an equivalence relation and that \(\sim\) has at most \(2^{n}\) equivalence classes. The equivalence class of \(a\) is denoted by \([a]\). Define \(B=A / \sim\) and \([a] \in S_{i} \Leftrightarrow a \in R_{i}, \mathfrak{B}=\) \(\left\langle B, S_{1}, \ldots, S_{n}\right\rangle .\) Show \(\mathfrak{A l} \models \sigma \Leftrightarrow \mathfrak{B} \models \sigma\) for all \(\sigma\) in the corresponding language. For such \(\sigma\) show \(\models \sigma \Leftrightarrow \mathfrak{A} \models \sigma\) for all \(\mathfrak{A}\) with at most \(2^{n}\) elements. Using this fact, outline a decision procedure for truth in monadic predicate calculus.

Let \(\sigma=\exists x \forall y(x \leq y \vee y \leq x)\). Find posets \(\mathfrak{A}\) and \(\mathfrak{B}\) such that \(\mathfrak{A} \models \sigma\) and \(\mathfrak{B} \models \neg \sigma\).

Show \(\not \models \exists x \varphi \wedge \exists x \psi \rightarrow \exists x(\varphi \wedge \psi)\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free