Chapter 2: Q23Q (page 93)
If an \(n \times n\) matrix K cannot be row reduced to \({I_n}\), what can you say about the columns of K? Why?
Short Answer
The columns of K are linearly dependent and do not span \({\mathbb{R}^n}\).
Chapter 2: Q23Q (page 93)
If an \(n \times n\) matrix K cannot be row reduced to \({I_n}\), what can you say about the columns of K? Why?
The columns of K are linearly dependent and do not span \({\mathbb{R}^n}\).
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeLet Abe an invertible \(n \times n\) matrix, and let B be an \(n \times p\) matrix. Show that the equation \(AX = B\) has a unique solution \({A^{ - 1}}B\).
In Exercises 1–9, assume that the matrices are partitioned conformably for block multiplication. In Exercises 5–8, find formulas for X, Y, and Zin terms of A, B, and C, and justify your calculations. In some cases, you may need to make assumptions about the size of a matrix in order to produce a formula. [Hint:Compute the product on the left, and set it equal to the right side.]
8. \[\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}A&B\\{\bf{0}}&I\end{array}} \right]\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}X&Y&Z\\{\bf{0}}&{\bf{0}}&I\end{array}} \right] = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}I&{\bf{0}}&{\bf{0}}\\{\bf{0}}&{\bf{0}}&I\end{array}} \right]\]
Suppose the third column of Bis the sum of the first two columns. What can you say about the third column of AB? Why?
Suppose \({A_{{\bf{11}}}}\) is an invertible matrix. Find matrices Xand Ysuch that the product below has the form indicated. Also,compute \({B_{{\bf{22}}}}\). [Hint:Compute the product on the left, and setit equal to the right side.]
\[\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}I&{\bf{0}}&{\bf{0}}\\X&I&{\bf{0}}\\Y&{\bf{0}}&I\end{array}} \right]\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{A_{{\bf{1}}1}}}&{{A_{{\bf{1}}2}}}\\{{A_{{\bf{2}}1}}}&{{A_{{\bf{2}}2}}}\\{{A_{{\bf{3}}1}}}&{{A_{{\bf{3}}2}}}\end{array}} \right] = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{B_{11}}}&{{B_{12}}}\\{\bf{0}}&{{B_{22}}}\\{\bf{0}}&{{B_{32}}}\end{array}} \right]\]
Let Abe an invertible \(n \times n\) matrix, and let \(B\) be an \(n \times p\) matrix. Explain why \({A^{ - 1}}B\) can be computed by row reduction: If\(\left( {\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}A&B\end{aligned}} \right) \sim ... \sim \left( {\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}I&X\end{aligned}} \right)\), then \(X = {A^{ - 1}}B\).
If Ais larger than \(2 \times 2\), then row reduction of \(\left( {\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}A&B\end{aligned}} \right)\) is much faster than computing both \({A^{ - 1}}\) and \({A^{ - 1}}B\).
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.