Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In the two-class priority queueing model of Section \(8.6 .2\), what is \(W_{Q}\) ? Show that \(W_{Q}\) is less than it would be under FIFO if \(E\left[S_{1}\right]E\left[S_{2}\right]\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In the two-class priority queueing model, the overall waiting time in the queue \(W_Q\) is given by: \(W_Q = P_2 \times W_{Q2}\), where \(W_{Q2} = P_1 \times E[S_1]\). When \(E[S_1] < E[S_2]\), \(W_Q\) is less than it would be under FIFO, and when \(E[S_1] > E[S_2]\), \(W_Q\) is greater than it would be under FIFO.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the two-class priority queueing model

Two-class priority queueing model consists of two classes of customers, Class 1 and Class 2. Class 1 customers have a higher priority, and their service times are defined by \(S_1\). Class 2 customers have a lower priority, with service times defined by \(S_2\). We assume that customers will be served based on their priorities, where Class 1 customers will always be served first.
02

Calculate the waiting time in the queue for Class 1 customers

According to the model, there will be no waiting time in the queue for Class 1 customers since they always have a higher priority and will be served immediately. So, the waiting time in the queue for Class 1 customers, denoted by \(W_{Q1}\), is 0.
03

Calculate the waiting time in the queue for Class 2 customers

We can define the waiting time in the queue for Class 2 customers \(W_{Q2}\) as the expected service time for Class 1 customers \((E[S_1])\) multiplied by the probability that a Class 1 customer arrives, denoted by \(P_1\). So, we write the equation for \(W_{Q2}\) as: \[W_{Q2} = P_1 \times E[S_1]\]
04

Calculate the overall waiting time in the queue, W_Q

Now, to calculate the overall waiting time in the queue (\(W_Q\)), we need to consider both Class 1 and Class 2 customers. We can define \(W_Q\) as a weighted average of the waiting times for Class 1 and Class 2 customers, given by: \[W_Q = P_1 \times W_{Q1} + P_2 \times W_{Q2}\] Since \(W_{Q1} = 0\), the equation simplifies to: \[W_Q = P_2 \times W_{Q2}\]
05

Analyze the impact of E[S_1] on W_Q

We are given two cases to analyze: when \(E[S_1] < E[S_2]\) and when \(E[S_1] > E[S_2]\). Case 1: \(E[S_1] < E[S_2]\) In this case, we can say that the service time of Class 1 customers is smaller than that of Class 2 customers, which means that there will be less idle time for the server. As a result, there will be a higher probability that Class 2 customers will have to wait in the queue since Class 1 customers are served faster. Thus, \(W_Q\) will be less than it would be under FIFO in this case. Case 2: \(E[S_1] > E[S_2]\) In this case, we can say that the service time of Class 1 customers is greater than that of Class 2 customers, leading to more idle time for the server. Consequently, there will be a lower probability that Class 2 customers will have to wait in the queue, as Class 1 customers take longer to be served. Therefore, \(W_Q\) will be greater than it would be under FIFO in this case. In conclusion, we have shown that when \(E[S_1] < E[S_2]\), the waiting time in the queue \(W_Q\) is less than it would be under FIFO, and when \(E[S_1] > E[S_2]\), the waiting time in the queue \(W_Q\) is greater than it would be under FIFO.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Waiting Time in Queue
Understanding the waiting time in a queue is crucial in many service industries as it helps to gauge the efficiency of service provision. In a priority queueing model, the waiting time in queue (\( W_Q \)) represents the time a customer spends in the queue before being served. In the provided exercise, a two-class priority system is examined to determine the impact of different average service times (\( E[S_1] \) and \( E[S_2] \)) on \( W_Q \).

For Class 1 customers with higher priority, the waiting time is zero because they are served immediately (\( W_{Q1} = 0 \)). For Class 2 customers, the waiting time (\( W_{Q2} \)) is the expected service time of Class 1 customers multiplied by the probability of Class 1 customer arrivals (\( P_1 \times E[S_1] \)). This introduces the dependency of Class 2 waiting times on Class 1's average service time. It illustrates that the shorter the service time for the higher priority customers, the less the impact on the lower priority's waiting time, and vice versa. This concept is fundamental as it demonstrates how service efficiency for one class influences the experience of another class in prioritized environments.
Service Times
Service times play a pivotal role in the functionality of queueing systems. Defined as the time required to serve a customer, the average service times (\( E[S_1] \) and \( E[S_2] \)) directly influence the waiting time in queue, as shown in the priority queueing model. When analyzing the differences in service times between two classes of customers, you can predict the subsequent effects on the queue's dynamics.

For instance, if the average service time for higher priority customers (\( E[S_1] \)) is less than that of lower priority customers (\( E[S_2] \)), the queue is less likely to be long for subsequent customers, as they are served more quickly. Conversely, if the high-priority customers take longer on average to serve (\( E[S_1] > E[S_2] \)), this can create delays in the system, increasing waiting times for others. Acknowledging these nuances helps to manage and design more efficient queueing systems.
FIFO (First In First Out)
FIFO, an acronym for First In, First Out, is a fundamental concept in queueing theory where customers are served in the exact order they arrive. This method assumes no priority differences between customers; hence it is 'fair' to all. The exercise compares the priority queueing model's waiting time (\( W_Q \)) to what it would be under a FIFO system when varying the average service times of the different customer classes. In scenarios where the service time of higher priority customers is shorter than that of lower priority customers (\( E[S_1] < E[S_2] \)), the waiting time under priority queueing would be less than FIFO. The inverse is true when high priority customers take longer to serve (\( E[S_1] > E[S_2] \)).

Incorporating FIFO systems is often straightforward, but it can lead to inefficiencies in cases where prioritization is necessary due to varying urgency or importance of service.
Queueing Theory
Queueing theory is a mathematical study of waiting lines or queues, which provides the tools for making predictions and optimizations in service-oriented systems. It encompasses the analysis of several key components such as arrival rates, service rates, the number of servers, and the priority rules, which collectively influence the system's performance. The exercise at hand uses queueing theory principles to assess the priority queueing model's effectiveness versus a FIFO system, given different service times. By using these principles, we can predict the waiting times and thereby devise ways to manage queues more effectively.

An understanding of queueing theory not only helps in predicting the waiting time in queues (\( W_Q \)) but also empowers businesses and service providers to enhance customer satisfaction by minimizing wait times through the optimization of service processes and queue management.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The manager of a market can hire either Mary or Alice. Mary, who gives service at an exponential rate of 20 customers per hour, can be hired at a rate of \(\$ 3\) per hour. Alice, who gives service at an exponential rate of 30 customers per hour, can be hired at a rate of \(\$ C\) per hour. The manager estimates that, on the average, each customer's time is worth \(\$ 1\) per hour and should be accounted for in the model. Assume customers arrive at a Poisson rate of 10 per hour (a) What is the average cost per hour if Mary is hired? If Alice is hired? (b) Find \(C\) if the average cost per hour is the same for Mary and Alice.

Compare the \(M / G / 1\) system for first-come, first-served queue discipline with one of last-come, first-served (for instance, in which units for service are taken from the top of a stack). Would you think that the queue size, waiting time, and busyperiod distribution differ? What about their means? What if the queue discipline was always to choose at random among those waiting? Intuitively, which discipline would result in the smallest variance in the waiting time distribution?

For the \(M / M / 1\) queue, compute (a) the expected number of arrivals during a service period and (b) the probability that no customers arrive during a service period. Hint: "Condition."

It follows from Exercise 4 that if, in the \(M / M / 1\) model, \(W_{Q}^{*}\) is the amount of time that a customer spends waiting in queue, then $$ W_{Q}^{*}=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll} 0, & \text { with probability } 1-\lambda / \mu \\ \operatorname{Exp}(\mu-\lambda), & \text { with probability } \lambda / \mu \end{array}\right. $$ where \(\operatorname{Exp}(\mu-\lambda)\) is an exponential random variable with rate \(\mu-\lambda .\) Using this, find \(\operatorname{Var}\left(W_{Q}^{*}\right)\)

Consider a queueing system having two servers and no queue. There are two types of customers. Type 1 customers arrive according to a Poisson process having rate \(\lambda_{1}\), and will enter the system if either server is free. The service time of a type 1 customer is exponential with rate \(\mu_{1}\). Type 2 customers arrive according to a Poisson process having rate \(\lambda_{2}\). A type 2 customer requires the simultaneous use of both servers; hence, a type 2 arrival will only enter the system if both servers are free. The time that it takes (the two servers) to serve a type 2 customer is exponential with rate \(\mu_{2}\). Once a service is completed on a customer, that customer departs the system. (a) Define states to analyze the preceding model. (b) Give the balance equations. In terms of the solution of the balance equations, find (c) the average amount of time an entering customer spends in the system; (d) the fraction of served customers that are type \(1 .\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free