Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a \(M / G / 1\) system with \(\lambda E[S]<1\). (a) Suppose that service is about to begin at a moment when there are \(n\) customers in the system. (i) Argue that the additional time until there are only \(n-1\) customers in the system has the same distribution as a busy period. (ii) What is the expected additional time until the system is empty? (b) Suppose that the work in the system at some moment is \(A\). We are interested in the expected additional time until the system is empty - call it \(E[T]\). Let \(N\) denote the number of arrivals during the first \(A\) units of time. (i) Compute \(E[T \mid N]\). (ii) Compute \(E[T]\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, the expected additional time until the system is empty can be described as follows: (a) For an \(M/G/1\) system, the additional time until there are only \(n-1\) customers in the system has the same distribution as a busy period. The expected additional time until the system is empty is \(E[T] = \frac{E[S]}{1 - \lambda E[S]}\). (b) Given the work in the system at some moment is \(A\), we can compute the expected additional time until the system is empty as \(E[T \mid N] = A + \lambda A (\frac{E[S]}{2})\) and \(E[T] = E[A] + \lambda E[A] (\frac{E[S]}{2})\).

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) - Busy Period Distribution

(i) To argue that the additional time until there are only \(n-1\) customers in the system has the same distribution as a busy period, consider that when service begins, we have \(n\) customers in the system. In a busy period, we have a continuous period of time in which the system is never empty, followed by the arrival of a new customer just before the busy period ends. Additionally, as it is an \(M/G/1\) system, the arrival rate is Poisson and the service time follows a general distribution. Now, with the arrival of new customers during the service time of the current customer and the continuous service of other customers, the \(n-1\) customers remaining in the system still follow the same conditions as the busy period. Therefore, the additional time until there are only \(n-1\) customers in the system has the same distribution as a busy period.
02

Part (a) - Expected Additional Time

(ii) To find the expected additional time until the system is empty, we can use the definition of the expected busy period length \(E[B]\), which is given by: \(E[B] = \frac{E[S]}{1 - \lambda E[S]}\) Where, \(E[S]\) is the expected service time, and \(\lambda\) is the arrival rate. Since \(\lambda E[S]<1\), a busy period will eventually end. The expected additional time until the system is empty is equal to the expected busy period length: \(E[T] = E[B] = \frac{E[S]}{1 - \lambda E[S]}\)
03

Part (b) - Compute \(E[T \mid N]\)

(i) To compute \(E[T \mid N]\), we'll consider that the expected additional time until the system is empty depends on the number of arrivals during the first \(A\) units of time, so we have: \(E[T \mid N] = E[A] + E[\text{Remaining work}] \) Since the number of arrivals follows a Poisson process with parameter \(\lambda\), we have: \(E[N] = \lambda A\) The expected remaining work will be, with probability \((1-\lambda)\), the residual life of the service time: \(E[\text{Remaining work}] = \frac{E[S]}{2}\) Thus, we have: \(E[T \mid N] = A + \lambda A (\frac{E[S]}{2})\)
04

Part (b) - Compute \(E[T]\)

(ii) To compute \(E[T]\), we should find the expectation of the additional time until the system is empty by using the conditional expectation: \(E[T] = E[E[T \mid N]]\) We have already found \(E[T \mid N] = A + \lambda A (\frac{E[S]}{2})\). Now, let's find the expectation: \(E[T] = E[A] + \lambda E[A] (\frac{E[S]}{2})\) Since \(E[A]\) is given in the problem, the final formula for the expected additional time until the system is empty is: \(E[T] = E[A] + \lambda E[A] (\frac{E[S]}{2})\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the \(\mathrm{M} / \mathrm{M} / 1\) system in which customers arrive at rate \(\lambda\) and the server serves at rate \(\mu .\) However, suppose that in any interval of length \(h\) in which the server is busy there is a probability \(\alpha h+o(h)\) that the server will experience a breakdown, which causes the system to shut down. All customers that are in the system depart, and no additional arrivals are allowed to enter until the breakdown is fixed. The time to fix a breakdown is exponentially distributed with rate \(\beta\). (a) Define appropriate states. (b) Give the balance equations. In terms of the long-run probabilities, (c) what is the average amount of time that an entering customer spends in the system?

In a queue with unlimited waiting space, arrivals are Poisson (parameter \(\lambda\) ) and service times are exponentially distributed (parameter \(\mu\) ). However, the server waits until \(K\) people are present before beginning service on the first customer; thereafter, he services one at a time until all \(K\) units, and all subsequent arrivals, are serviced. The server is then "idle" until \(K\) new arrivals have occurred. (a) Define an appropriate state space, draw the transition diagram, and set up the balance equations. (b) In terms of the limiting probabilities, what is the average time a customer spends in queue? (c) What conditions on \(\lambda\) and \(\mu\) are necessary?

In a two-class priority queueing model suppose that a cost of \(C_{i}\) per unit time is incurred for each type \(i\) customer that waits in queue, \(i=1,2 .\) Show that type 1 customers should be given priority over type 2 (as opposed to the reverse) if $$ \frac{E\left[S_{1}\right]}{C_{1}}<\frac{E\left[S_{2}\right]}{C_{2}} $$

A group of \(m\) customers frequents a single-server station in the following manner. When a customer arrives, he or she either enters service if the server is free or joins the queue otherwise. Upon completing service the customer departs the system, but then returns after an exponential time with rate \(\theta\). All service times are exponentially distributed with rate \(\mu\). (a) Find the average rate at which customers enter the station. (b) Find the average time that a customer spends in the station per visit.

Consider a sequential-service system consisting of two servers, \(A\) and \(B\). Arriving customers will enter this system only if server \(A\) is free. If a customer does enter, then he is immediately served by server \(A\). When his service by \(A\) is completed, he then goes to \(B\) if \(B\) is free, or if \(B\) is busy, he leaves the system. Upon completion of service at server \(B\), the customer departs. Assume that the (Poisson) arrival rate is two customers an hour, and that \(A\) and \(B\) serve at respective (exponential) rates of four and two customers an hour. (a) What proportion of customers enter the system? (b) What proportion of entering customers receive service from B? (c) What is the average number of customers in the system? (d) What is the average amount of time that an entering customer spends in the system?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free