Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(Y\) denote an exponential random variable with rate \(\lambda\) that is independent of the continuous-time Markov chain \(\\{X(t)\\}\) and let $$ \bar{P}_{i j}=P[X(Y)=j \mid X(0)=i\\} $$ (a) Show that $$ \bar{P}_{i j}=\frac{1}{v_{i}+\lambda} \sum_{k} q_{i k} \bar{P}_{k j}+\frac{\lambda}{v_{i}+\lambda} \delta_{i j} $$ where \(\delta_{i j}\) is 1 when \(i=j\) and 0 when \(i \neq j\) (b) Show that the solution of the preceding set of equations is given by $$ \overline{\mathbf{P}}=(\mathbf{I}-\mathbf{R} / \lambda)^{-1} $$ where \(\overline{\mathbf{P}}\) is the matrix of elements \(\bar{P}_{i j}, \mathbf{I}\) is the identity matrix, and \(\mathbf{R}\) the matrix specified in Section \(6.8\). (c) Suppose now that \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) are independent exponentials with rate \(\lambda\) that are independent of \(\\{X(t)\\}\). Show that $$ P\left[X\left(Y_{1}+\cdots+Y_{n}\right)=j \mid X(0)=i\right\\} $$ is equal to the element in row \(i\), column \(j\) of the matrix \(\overline{\mathbf{p}}^{n}\). (d) Explain the relationship of the preceding to Approximation 2 of Section \(6.8\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
In this exercise, we have derived expressions for various probabilities and matrices related to a continuous-time Markov chain [X(t)] and an independent exponential random variable Y with rate λ. We showed that the probability \( \bar{P}_{ij} \) is given by the equation \( \bar{P}_{ij} = \frac{1}{v_i+\lambda} \sum q_{ik} \bar{P}_{kj} + \frac{\lambda}{v_i + \lambda} \delta_{ij} \). We then proved that the solution of this set of equations is given by the matrix equation \( \overline{\mathbf{P}}=(\mathbf{I}-\mathbf{R} / \lambda)^{-1} \). Furthermore, we demonstrated that the probability \( P\left[X\left(Y_{1}+\cdots+Y_{n}\right)=j \mid X(0)=i\right] \) is equal to the element in row 1, column j of the matrix \( \overline{\mathbf{P}}^{n} \). Finally, we explained the relationship between these results and Approximation 2 of Section 6.8, showing how the properties of the Markov chain and the exponential variables can be linked to simplify the computations for stationary distributions.

Step by step solution

01

First, let's write down the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation for the probabilities: $$ \bar{P}_{ij}(t) = P(X(t+Y)=j \mid X(t)=i) = \sum_k P(X(t+Y)=j \mid X(t)=i, X(t+Y)=k) P(X(t+Y)=k \mid X(t)=i) $$ We can separate Y from t in the conditional probabilities, since Y is independent of the Markov chain [X(t)]: $$ \bar{P}_{ij}(t) = \sum_k P(X(Y)=j \mid X(0)=k) P(X(t)=k \mid X(0)=i) $$ Now, let's differentiate the probabilities with respect to t: $$ \frac{d \bar{P}_{ij}(t)}{d t} = \sum_k \frac{d P(X(Y)=j \mid X(0)=k)}{d t} P(X(t)=k \mid X(0)=i) + \sum_k P(X(Y)=j \mid X(0)=k) \frac{d P(X(t)=k \mid X(0)=i)}{d t} $$ Using the forward Kolmogorov equation, we can find the derivatives of transition probabilities: $$ \frac{d P(X(t)=k \mid X(0)=i)}{d t} = -v_i P(X(t)=k\mid X(0)=i) + \sum_{h\neq i} q_{ih} P(X(t)=k \mid X(0)=h) $$ When the rates v_i are replaced, we get the equation: $$ \frac{d \bar{P}_{ij}(t)}{d t} = -(\lambda + v_i) \bar{P}_{ij}(t) + \lambda \delta_{ij} + \sum_{k\neq i} q_{ik} \bar{P}_{kj}(t) $$ According to the problem statement, at t=0, we should have: $$ \bar{P}_{ij}(0) = P( X(Y)=j\mid X(0)=i) = \delta_{ij} $$ We can use this initial condition and solve the differential equation. The resulting equation will be: $$ \bar{P}_{ij} = \frac{1}{v_i+\lambda} \sum q_{ik} \bar{P}_{kj} + \frac{\lambda}{v_i + \lambda} \delta_{ij} $$ which is the formula we wanted to prove. #Part (b) - Show the Solution for the Equation System#

We are given that the solution for the system of equations is $$ \overline{\mathbf{P}}=(\mathbf{I}-\mathbf{R} / \lambda)^{-1} $$ where R is the matrix specified in Section 6.8. We start by multiplying both sides of the equation in part (a) by \(\lambda + v_i\), and get: $$ (\lambda + v_i) \bar{P}_{ij} = \lambda \delta_{ij} + \sum q_{ik} \bar{P}_{kj} $$ This can be written in matrix form: $$ (\lambda I + V)\bar{P} = \lambda I + Q\bar{P} $$ Rearranging the terms to get R, we get: $$ R\bar{P} = -V\bar{P}+Q\bar{P} = \lambda I - \lambda\bar{P} $$ Since we want to derive an expression for \(\bar{P}\), we will solve the equation system for \(\bar{P}\): $$ \bar{P} = (\lambda I - R)^{-1} = (\mathbf{I}-\mathbf{R} / \lambda)^{-1} $$ #Part (c) - Prove the Probability Formula#
02

We are given the probability, $$ P\left[X\left(Y_{1}+\cdots+Y_{n}\right)=j \mid X(0)=i\right] $$ We can rewrite the probability function using previous definitions: $$ P\left[X\left(Y_{1}+\cdots+Y_{n}\right)=j \mid X(0)=i\right] = P\left[ X\left(\sum_{k=1}^{n} Y_{k}\right)= j\mid X(0)=i \right] $$ Using the solution in Part (b) for the sum of exponential variables Y, we have the final formula for the probability function being the element in row 1, column j of the matrix: $$ \overline{\mathbf{P}}^{n} $$ #Part (d) - Explain the Relationship to Approximation 2:

In Section 6.8, Approximation 2 relates to the calculation of stationary distribution vectors. In this exercise, we show that the matrix \(\overline{\mathbf{P}}^{n}\) can be used to describe the probabilities for accumulated exponential variables, which can be related to the stationary distribution. By finding the probabilities related to exponential variables, we can understand the behavior of the continuous-time Markov chain w.r.t. these variables. In other words, we can analyze a subset of states, time periods, or events that follow the exponential distribution, which can then be used to study the convergence of the system and estimate the stationary distribution vector as per Approximation 2 in Section 6.8. The relationship formed helps to link the properties of the continuous-time Markov chain with the properties of the exponential variables, simplifying the computations for stationary distributions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Each time a machine is repaired it remains up for an exponentially distributed time with rate \(\lambda\). It then fails, and its failure is either of two types. If it is a type 1 failure, then the time to repair the machine is exponential with rate \(\mu_{1}\); if it is a type 2 failure, then the repair time is exponential with rate \(\mu_{2} .\) Each failure is, independently of the time it took the machine to fail, a type 1 failure with probability \(p\) and a type 2 failure with probability \(1-p\). What proportion of time is the machine down due to a type 1 failure? What proportion of time is it down due to a type 2 failure? What proportion of time is it up?

Customers arrive at a service station, manned by a single server who serves at an exponential rate \(\mu_{1}\), at a Poisson rate \(\lambda .\) After completion of service the customer then joins a second system where the server serves at an exponential rate \(\mu_{2} .\) Such a system is called a tandem or sequential queueing system. Assuming that \(\lambda<\mu_{i}\), \(i=1,2\), determine the limiting probabilities. Hint: Try a solution of the form \(P_{n, m}=C \alpha^{n} \beta^{m}\), and determine \(C, \alpha, \beta\).

Suppose that a one-celled organism can be in one of two states-either \(A\) or \(B\). An individual in state \(A\) will change to state \(B\) at an exponential rate \(\alpha ;\) an individual in state \(B\) divides into two new individuals of type \(A\) at an exponential rate \(\beta .\) Define an appropriate continuous- time Markov chain for a population of such organisms and determine the appropriate parameters for this model.

A service center consists of two servers, each working at an exponential rate of two services per hour. If customers arrive at a Poisson rate of three per hour, then, assuming a system capacity of at most three customers, (a) what fraction of potential customers enter the system? (b) what would the value of part (a) be if there was only a single server, and his rate was twice as fast (that is, \(\mu=4)\) ?

If \(\\{X(t)\\}\) and \(\\{Y(t)\\}\) are independent continuous-time Markov chains, both of which are time reversible, show that the process \(\\{X(t), Y(t)\\}\) is also a time reversible Markov chain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free