Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

If \(X_{1}\) and \(X_{2}\) are independent nonnegative continuous random variables, show that $$ P\left\\{X_{1}

Short Answer

Expert verified
In order to prove \(P\left\{X_{1}<X_{2} \mid \min \left(X_{1}, X_{2}\right)=t\right\}=\frac{r_{1}(t)}{r_{1}(t)+r_{2}(t)}\), we expressed the probability of the given condition in terms of the distributions of the random variables \(X_1\) and \(X_2\), and utilized the properties of the failure rate function. After breaking down the numerator and denominator and substituting the failure rate function expressions, we simplified the conditional probability and found that the given relationship holds true.

Step by step solution

01

Define the given probability

We are asked to prove: \( P\left\{X_{1}<X_{2} \mid \min \left(X_{1}, X_{2}\right)=t\right\}=\frac{r_{1}(t)}{r_{1}(t)+r_{2}(t)} \) Where \(X_1\) and \(X_2\) are independent nonnegative continuous random variables, and \(r_i(t)\) is the failure rate function for \(X_i\).
02

Express the probability of the given condition

We know that \(P\left\{X_{1}<X_{2} \mid \min \left(X_{1}, X_{2}\right)=t\right\} = \frac{P\left\{X_1 < X_2, \min(X_1, X_2) = t \right\}}{P\left\{\min(X_1, X_2) = t\right\}}\)
03

Break down the numerator

We have \(P\left\{X_1 < X_2, \min(X_1, X_2) = t\right\}= P\left\{X_1 = t, X_2 > t\right\}\) since \(\min(X_1, X_2) = t\) and \(X_1 < X_2\). Since \(X_1\) and \(X_2\) are independent, we can write the joint probability as a product of their densities: \(P\left\{X_1 = t, X_2 > t\right\} = f_1(t) \int_t^{\infty} f_2(x_2) dx_2\) Where \(f_1(t)\) and \(f_2(x_2)\) are the probability density functions of \(X_1\) and \(X_2\), respectively.
04

Break down the denominator

The denominator can be expressed as: \(P\left\{\min(X_1, X_2) = t\right\} = P\left\{X_1 = t, X_2 > t\right\} + P\left\{X_2 = t, X_1 > t\right\}\) Like the numerator, we can break down the probabilities into a product of their densities: \(P\left\{\min(X_1, X_2) = t\right\} = f_1(t) \int_t^{\infty} f_2(x_2) dx_2 + f_2(t) \int_t^{\infty} f_1(x_1) dx_1\)
05

Compute the failure rate function

The failure rate function \(r_i(t)\) for \(X_i\) is given by: \(r_i(t) = \frac{f_i(t)}{1 - F_i(t)}\) Where \(F_i(t)\) is the cumulative distribution function of \(X_i\). To relate this with our expressions in steps 3 and 4, we need to manipulate this expression to include our densities. We can rewrite the expression as: \(f_i(t) = r_i(t)(1 - F_i(t))\)
06

Substitute the failure rate function into our expressions

Using the rewritten failure rate functions in Steps 3 and 4 expressions: Numerator: \(P\left\{X_1 = t, X_2 > t\right\} = r_1(t)(1 - F_1(t)) \int_t^{\infty} f_2(x_2) dx_2\) Denominator: \(P\left\{\min(X_1, X_2) = t\right\} = r_1(t)(1 - F_1(t)) \int_t^{\infty} f_2(x_2) dx_2 + r_2(t)(1 - F_2(t)) \int_t^{\infty} f_1(x_1) dx_1\)
07

Substitute and simplify the conditional probability

Substitute the expressions we obtained so far back into the original conditional probability expression: \( P\left\{X_{1}<X_{2} \mid \min \left(X_{1}, X_{2}\right)=t\right\}=\frac{r_1(t)(1 - F_1(t)) \int_t^{\infty} f_2(x_2) dx_2}{r_1(t)(1 - F_1(t)) \int_t^{\infty} f_2(x_2) dx_2 + r_2(t)(1 - F_2(t)) \int_t^{\infty} f_1(x_1) dx_1} \) Now, notice that the terms \((1 - F_1(t)) \int_t^{\infty} f_2(x_2) dx_2\) in the numerator and denominator cancel out, leaving us with: \( P\left\{X_{1}<X_{2} \mid \min \left(X_{1}, X_{2}\right)=t\right\}=\frac{r_1(t)}{r_1(t)+r_2(t)} \) This completes the proof.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Continuous Random Variables
When exploring the realm of probability, we encounter continuous random variables. Unlike their discrete counterparts, which take on distinct values, continuous random variables can take on any value within a certain range or interval. This range may be finite or infinite, and the variables are often associated with measurements like time, weight, or distance.

To illustrate, think of measuring the length of a leaf. It could be any number from, say, 5 to 10 centimeters, including any fraction in between. This is a continuous range, and if the leaf length is a random variable, it would be a continuous random variable.
Failure Rate Function
The concept of a failure rate function enters the stage particularly in the context of survival analysis or reliability engineering. It describes the rate at which failures occur over time. Formally, for a continuous random variable representing the time until failure, the failure rate function, often denoted by \(r(t)\), is defined as the ratio of the probability density function (PDF) of the time to failure at a specific time \(t\) to the probability of surviving until that time, expressed by the complementary cumulative distribution function (CCDF).

Mathematical Expression

The mathematical expression for the failure rate function is \(r(t) = \frac{f(t)}{1 - F(t)}\), where \(f(t)\) is the PDF and \(F(t)\) is the cumulative distribution function (CDF). This ratio gives insight into how likely a failure is to occur at a particular moment, given that it hasn't occurred yet.
Probability Density Function
Drill down into probability density function (PDF), and we find the cornerstone for working with continuous random variables. The PDF, denoted as \(f(x)\), represents the likelihood of the random variable falling within a particular infinitesimal range near \(x\).

Contrary to probability mass functions for discrete variables which give probabilities directly, the PDF itself is not a probability. Instead, probabilities are determined through integration over an interval. If you want to know the probability that a variable is between \(a\) and \(b\), you integrate the PDF over that range. Therefore, the area under the entire PDF curve over its range (which is always positive) sums up to 1, signifying the total probability.
Cumulative Distribution Function
Threading further down the statistical path, we encounter the cumulative distribution function (CDF). It is related to the PDF but with a distinct purpose — the CDF, denoted by \(F(x)\), tells us the probability that a continuous random variable will take a value less than or equal to \(x\).

Imagine rolling up the area under the PDF curve from negative infinity to a point \(x\); the CDF reflects this accumulated probability. It's a non-decreasing function that starts off at 0 and approaches 1 as \(x\) heads towards infinity. The CDF is an essential tool for understanding the overall distribution and behavior of random variables.
Independent Random Variables
The concept of independent random variables is vital when dealing with multiple stochastic processes. Independence implies that the occurrence of one random event does not influence the probability of occurrence of another. To put it another way, knowing the outcome of one doesn't provide any information about the other.

In our exercise, we are dealing with two independent random variables \(X_1\) and \(X_2\). This allowed us to express the probability of a joint event as the product of the individual probabilities or PDFs for each variable. Independence is a powerful assumption that simplifies complex probability calculations, keeping each variable's behavior strictly within its own domain, unaffected by its counterparts.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Some components of a two-component system fail after receiving a shock. Shocks of three types arrive independently and in accordance with Poisson processes. Shocks of the first type arrive at a Poisson rate \(\lambda_{1}\) and cause the first component to fail. Those of the second type arrive at a Poisson rate \(\lambda_{2}\) and cause the second component to fail. The third type of shock arrives at a Poisson rate \(\lambda_{3}\) and causes both components to fail. Let \(X_{1}\) and \(X_{2}\) denote the survival times for the two components. Show that the joint distribution of \(X_{1}\) and \(X_{2}\) is given by $$ P\left\\{X_{1}>s, X_{1}>t\right\\}=\exp \left\\{-\lambda_{1} s-\lambda_{2} t-\lambda_{3} \max (s, t)\right\\} $$ This distribution is known as the bivariate exponential distribution.

An insurance company pays out claims on its life insurance policies in accordance with a Poisson process having rate \(\lambda=5\) per week. If the amount of money paid on each policy is exponentially distributed with mean \(\$ 2000\), what is the mean and variance of the amount of money paid by the insurance company in a four-week span?

Customers arrive at a bank at a Poisson rate \(\lambda .\) Suppose two customers arrived during the first hour. What is the probability that (a) both arrived during the first 20 minutes? (b) at least one arrived during the first 20 minutes?

There are two types of claims that are made to an insurance company. Let \(N_{i}(t)\) denote the number of type \(i\) claims made by time \(t\), and suppose that \(\left\\{N_{1}(t), t \geqslant 0\right\\}\) and \(\left\\{N_{2}(t), t \geqslant 0\right\\}\) are independent Poisson processes with rates \(\lambda_{1}=10\) and \(\lambda_{2}=1 .\) The amounts of successive type 1 claims are independent exponential random variables with mean \(\$ 1000\) whereas the amounts from type 2 claims are independent exponential random variables with mean \(\$ 5000 .\) A claim for \(\$ 4000\) has just been received; what is the probability it is a type 1 claim?

In good years, storms occur according to a Poisson process with rate 3 per unit time, while in other years they occur according to a Poisson process with rate 5 per unit time. Suppose next year will be a good year with probability \(0.3\). Let \(N(t)\) denote the number of storms during the first \(t\) time units of next year. (a) Find \(P\\{N(t)=n]\). (b) Is \([N(t)\\}\) a Poisson process? (c) Does \(\\{N(t)\\}\) have stationary increments? Why or why not? (d) Does it have independent increments? Why or why not? (e) If next year starts off with three storms by time \(t=1\), what is the conditional probability it is a good year?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free