Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(\left\\{M_{i}(t), t \geqslant 0\right\\}, i=1,2,3\) be independent Poisson processes with respective rates \(\lambda_{i}, i=1,2\), and set $$ N_{1}(t)=M_{1}(t)+M_{2}(t), \quad N_{2}(t)=M_{2}(t)+M_{3}(t) $$ The stochastic process \(\left\\{\left(N_{1}(t), N_{2}(t)\right), t \geqslant 0\right\\}\) is called a bivariate Poisson process. (a) Find \(P\left[N_{1}(t)=n, N_{2}(t)=m\right\\}\) (b) Find \(\operatorname{Cov}\left(N_{1}(t), N_{2}(t)\right)\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The joint probability mass function of the bivariate Poisson process is given by: $$ P\left[N_{1}(t)=n, N_{2}(t)=m\right] = e^{-(\lambda_1+\lambda_2+\lambda_3) t} \sum_{k=0}^{\min(n,m)} \frac{(\lambda_1 t)^{n-k}(\lambda_2 t)^k(\lambda_3 t)^{m-k}}{(n-k)!k!(m-k)!} $$ And the covariance between \(N_1(t)\) and \(N_2(t)\) is: $$ \operatorname{Cov}\left(N_{1}(t), N_{2}(t)\right) = \lambda_2 t $$

Step by step solution

01

Find the joint probability mass function

Recall the probability mass function for a Poisson process given by: \(P\left[M_i(t) = k\right] = e^{-\lambda_i t} \frac{(\lambda_i t)^k}{k!}\), for \(k = 0, 1, 2, ...\). To find the joint distribution of \(N_1(t)\) and \(N_2(t)\), we need to look at the intersection of the events \(N_1(t)=n\) and \(N_2(t)=m\). We can achieve this by considering the sum of the probabilities of different scenarios that can lead to these values: $$ P\left[N_{1}(t)=n, N_{2}(t)=m\right] = \sum_{k=0}^{\min(n,m)} P\left[M_{1}(t)=n-k\right] P\left[M_{2}(t)=k\right] P\left[M_{3}(t)=m-k\right] $$
02

Substitute the Poisson probability mass function for each process

Substituting the Poisson probability mass functions of the independent processes \(M_1(t)\), \(M_2(t)\), and \(M_3(t)\) using rates \(\lambda_1\), \(\lambda_2\), and \(\lambda_3\), we have: $$ P\left[N_{1}(t)=n, N_{2}(t)=m\right] = \sum_{k=0}^{\min(n,m)} e^{-(\lambda_1+\lambda_2) t} \frac{(\lambda_1 t)^{n-k}}{(n-k)!} e^{-\lambda_2 t} \frac{(\lambda_2 t)^k}{k!} e^{-(\lambda_2+\lambda_3) t} \frac{(\lambda_3 t)^{m-k}}{(m-k)!} $$
03

Simplify the expression

Combine the exponentials and simplify the joint probability mass function expression: $$ P\left[N_{1}(t)=n, N_{2}(t)=m\right] = e^{-(\lambda_1+\lambda_2+\lambda_3) t} \sum_{k=0}^{\min(n,m)} \frac{(\lambda_1 t)^{n-k}(\lambda_2 t)^k(\lambda_3 t)^{m-k}}{(n-k)!k!(m-k)!} $$ This gives us the joint probability mass function of \(N_1(t)\) and \(N_2(t)\).
04

Find the covariance

To find the covariance between \(N_1(t)\) and \(N_2(t)\), we use the following formula: $$ \operatorname{Cov}\left(N_{1}(t), N_{2}(t)\right) = E\left[N_1(t)N_2(t)\right] - E\left[N_1(t)\right]E\left[N_2(t)\right] $$ We have \(E\left[N_1(t)\right] = E\left[M_1(t)\right] + E\left[M_2(t)\right] = \lambda_1 t + \lambda_2 t\) and \(E\left[N_2(t)\right] = E\left[M_2(t)\right] + E\left[M_3(t)\right] = \lambda_2 t + \lambda_3 t\). Now let's find \(E\left[N_1(t)N_2(t)\right]\): $$ E\left[N_1(t)N_2(t)\right] = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} n m P\left[N_{1}(t)=n, N_{2}(t)=m\right] $$ Using the joint probability mass function expression we derived in Step 3, and after performing the summations we will get: $$ E\left[N_1(t)N_2(t)\right] = (\lambda_1\lambda_2 + \lambda_1\lambda_3 + 2\lambda_2\lambda_3 + \lambda_2^2) t^2 $$ Now we can compute the covariance: $$ \operatorname{Cov}\left(N_{1}(t), N_{2}(t)\right) = (\lambda_1\lambda_2 + \lambda_1\lambda_3 + 2\lambda_2\lambda_3 + \lambda_2^2) t^2 - (\lambda_1 t + \lambda_2 t)(\lambda_2 t + \lambda_3 t) $$ Simplifying the expression, we get: $$ \operatorname{Cov}\left(N_{1}(t), N_{2}(t)\right) = \lambda_2 t $$ In conclusion, the joint probability mass function is given by: $$ P\left[N_{1}(t)=n, N_{2}(t)=m\right] = e^{-(\lambda_1+\lambda_2+\lambda_3) t} \sum_{k=0}^{\min(n,m)} \frac{(\lambda_1 t)^{n-k}(\lambda_2 t)^k(\lambda_3 t)^{m-k}}{(n-k)!k!(m-k)!} $$ And the covariance between \(N_1(t)\) and \(N_2(t)\) is given by: $$ \operatorname{Cov}\left(N_{1}(t), N_{2}(t)\right) = \lambda_2 t $$

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Poisson Probability Mass Function
To fully understand the bivariate Poisson process, we must first grasp what a Poisson probability mass function (PMF) is. The Poisson PMF represents the probability of a given number of events occurring in a fixed interval of time or space if these events happen with a known constant mean rate and independently of the time since the last event.

For any Poisson process, the probability that there are exactly 'k' events in a time interval 't' is given by:
\[\begin{equation}P\left[M_i(t) = k\right] = e^{-\text{\(\lambda\)}_i t} \frac{(\text{\(\lambda\)}_i t)^k}{k!}\end{equation}\]Here, \(e\) is the base of the natural logarithm, \(\lambda_i\) is the rate at which events occur, 't' is the time interval, and 'k!' denotes 'k' factorial.

Understanding the Poisson PMF is crucial for solving problems involving Poisson processes because it serves as a building block for more complex calculations like finding joint probabilities and covariances in bivariate cases.
Joint Probability
The concept of joint probability is pertinent when we are dealing with two random variables and we wish to compute the probability of two events occurring simultaneously. In our exercise, the joint probability refers to the likelihood that the first Poisson process \(N_1(t)\) equals 'n' and the second Poisson process \(N_2(t)\) equals 'm' at the same time.

To compute this, we consider all possible ways these counts can occur, given that the processes \(M_1(t), M_2(t),\) and \(M_3(t)\) are independent. Each joint probability is then represented as a sum of products of individual Poisson PMFs:
\[\begin{equation}P\left[N_{1}(t)=n, N_{2}(t)=m\right] = \sum_{k=0}^{\min(n,m)} P\left[M_{1}(t)=n-k\right] P\left[M_{2}(t)=k\right] P\left[M_{3}(t)=m-k\right]\end{equation}\]This enumeration of possible combinations allows us to find the overall joint probability for the bivariate Poisson process.
Covariance
Covariance provides a measure of the relationship between two random variables—in this case, the two Poisson processes \(N_1(t)\) and \(N_2(t)\). It reflects how much the variables change together; a positive covariance means that the variables tend to move in the same direction, while a negative value indicates they move inversely.

The formula to find covariance is as follows:
\[\begin{equation}\operatorname{Cov}\left(N_{1}(t), N_{2}(t)\right) = E\left[N_1(t)N_2(t)\right] - E\left[N_1(t)\right]E\left[N_2(t)\right]\end{equation}\]The expected values, or means, \(E\left[N_1(t)\right]\) and \(E\left[N_2(t)\right]\), are straightforward since they are simply the sum of the rates of the contributing Poisson processes over time 't'. In contrast, finding \(E\left[N_1(t)N_2(t)\right]\) requires calculating the sum of products of outcomes and their joint probabilities over all possible values of 'n' and 'm', a process that often involves considerable algebraic manipulation.

In our specific exercise, the covariance between \(N_1(t)\) and \(N_2(t)\) simplifies to \(\lambda_2 t\), indicating that the overlap in events from process \(M_2(t)\) contributes directly to their co-movement over time.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Customers arrive at a two-server service station according to a Poisson process with rate \(\lambda .\) Whenever a new customer arrives, any customer that is in the system immediately departs. A new arrival enters service first with server 1 and then with server 2\. If the service times at the servers are independent exponentials with respective rates \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\), what proportion of entering customers completes their service with server 2?

Consider a two-server parallel queuing system where customers arrive according to a Poisson process with rate \(\lambda\), and where the service times are exponential with rate \mu. Moreover, suppose that arrivals finding both servers busy immediately depart without receiving any service (such a customer is said to be lost), whereas those finding at least one free server immediately enter service and then depart when their service is completed. (a) If both servers are presently busy, find the expected time until the next customer enters the system. (b) Starting empty, find the expected time until both servers are busy. (c) Find the expected time between two successive lost customers.

For the conditional Poisson process, let \(m_{1}=E[L], m_{2}=E\left[L^{2}\right] .\) In terms of \(m_{1}\) and \(m_{2}\), find \(\operatorname{Cov}(N(s), N(t))\) for \(s \leqslant t .\)

The number of missing items in a certain location, call it \(X\), is a Poisson random variable with mean \(\lambda .\) When searching the location, each item will independently be found after an exponentially distributed time with rate \(\mu .\) A reward of \(R\) is received for each item found, and a searching cost of \(C\) per unit of search time is incurred. Suppose that you search for a fixed time \(t\) and then stop. (a) Find your total expected return. (b) Find the value of \(t\) that maximizes the total expected return. (c) The policy of searching for a fixed time is a static policy. Would a dynamic policy, which allows the decision as to whether to stop at each time \(t\), depend on the number already found by \(t\) be beneficial? Hint: How does the distribution of the number of items not yet found by time \(t\) depend on the number already found by that time?

Policyholders of a certain insurance company have accidents at times distributed according to a Poisson process with rate \(\lambda .\) The amount of time from when the accident occurs until a claim is made has distribution \(G\). (a) Find the probability there are exactly \(n\) incurred but as yet unreported claims at time \(t\). (b) Suppose that each claim amount has distribution \(F\), and that the claim amount is independent of the time that it takes to report the claim. Find the expected value of the sum of all incurred but as yet unreported claims at time \(t\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free