Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A group of \(n\) processors is arranged in an ordered list. When a job arrives, the first processor in line attempts it; if it is unsuccessful, then the next in line tries it; if it too is unsuccessful, then the next in line tries it, and so on. When the job is successfully processed or after all processors have been unsuccessful, the job leaves the system. At this point we are allowed to reorder the processors, and a new job appears. Suppose that we use the one- closer reordering rule, which moves the processor that was successful one closer to the front of the line by interchanging its position with the one in front of it. If all processors were unsuccessful (or if the processor in the first position was successful), then the ordering remains the same. Suppose that each time processor \(i\) attempts a job then, independently of anything else, it is successful with probability \(p_{i}\). (a) Define an appropriate Markov chain to analyze this model. (b) Show that this Markov chain is time reversible. (c) Find the long-run probabilities.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In this analysis, we defined a Markov chain \((X_t)\), where \(X_t\) represents the ordering of the \(n\) processors at time \(t\). The state-space for \(X_t\) has n! states due to the n! possible orderings of the processors. The transition probabilities were specified for successful processing and unsuccessful processing. The Markov chain was proven to be time reversible as the detailed balance equation is satisfied. Finally, the long-run probabilities were found to be the stationary distribution, which is given by \(\pi(i) = \frac{1}{n!}\) for all states \(i\).

Step by step solution

01

Defining a Markov Chain for the Processor Model

Let us define a Markov chain \((X_t)\), where \(X_t\) represents the ordering of the \(n\) processors at time \(t\). The state-space for \(X_t\) will be the set of all possible permutations of the \(n\) processors. Since the system has n! possible orderings, our Markov chain will have n! states. Now, let's specify the transition probabilities. Suppose the processors are arranged as \(p_1, p_2, ..., p_n\). If processor \(i\) processes the job successfully, its position changes with the processor in front of it \((i-1)\). The transition probabilities can be defined as: - If processor i is successful (for \(1<i \leq n\)): \(P(X_{t+1}=p_1,..,p_{i-2},p_i,p_{i-1},..,p_n|X_t = p_1,..,p_n) = p_i(1-p_1)...(1-p_{i-1})\) - If all processors are unsuccessful or processor 1 is successful: \(P(X_{t+1}=p_1,..,p_n|X_t = p_1,..,p_n) = (1-p_1)p_2(1-p_3)...(1-p_n) + p_1\)
02

Prove that the Markov Chain is Time Reversible

A Markov Chain is time reversible if the detailed balance equation is satisfied. The detailed balance equation for a Markov chain is given by: \( \pi(i)P_{ij} = \pi(j)P_{ji},\) where \(\pi(i)\) and \(\pi(j)\) are the long-run probabilities of states \(i\) and \(j\), and \(P_{ij}\) is the transition probability from state \(i\) to state \(j\). Given that the processors are arranged in an ordered list, we know that there exists a stationary distribution where every possible ordering is equally likely. Let \(\pi\) denote the stationary distribution of this Markov chain. Therefore, we can write: \(\pi(i)=\frac{1}{n!}\) Now, we can prove this Markov chain is time reversible by examining the detailed balance equation: \(\frac{1}{n!}P_{ij} = \frac{1}{n!}P_{ji} \implies P_{ij} = P_{ji}\) Since the detailed balance equation is satisfied, our Markov chain is time reversible.
03

Finding the Long-run Probabilities

As we have proven that the Markov chain is time reversible, we can now compute its long-run probabilities. The stationary distribution (\(\pi\)) for this Markov chain is given by: \(\pi(i) = \frac{1}{n!}\) Since every possible ordering is equally likely in the long-run, the long-run probabilities of the Markov chain are simply the stationary distribution: Long-run probabilities: \(\pi(i) = \frac{1}{n!}\) for all states \(i\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider three urns, one colored red, one white, and one blue. The red urn contains 1 red and 4 blue balls; the white urn contains 3 white balls, 2 red balls, and 2 blue balls; the blue urn contains 4 white balls, 3 red balls, and 2 blue balls. At the initial stage, a ball is randomly selected from the red urn and then returned to that urn. At every subsequent stage, a ball is randomly selected from the urn whose color is the same as that of the ball previously selected and is then returned to that urn. In the long run, what proportion of the selected balls are red? What proportion are white? What proportion are blue?

Recall that state \(i\) is said to be positive recurrent if \(m_{i, i}<\infty\), where \(m_{i, i}\) is the expected number of transitions until the Markov chain, starting in state \(i\), makes a transition back into that state. Because \(\pi_{i}\), the long-run proportion of time the Markov chain, starting in state \(i\), spends in state \(i\), satisfies $$ \pi_{i}=\frac{1}{m_{i, i}} $$ it follows that state \(i\) is positive recurrent if and only if \(\pi_{i}>0\). Suppose that state \(i\) is positive recurrent and that state \(i\) communicates with state \(j .\) Show that state \(j\) is also positive recurrent by arguing that there is an integer \(n\) such that $$ \pi_{j} \geqslant \pi_{i} P_{i, j}^{n}>0 $$

For a Markov chain \(\left\\{X_{n}, n \geqslant 0\right\\}\) with transition probabilities \(P_{i, j}\), consider the conditional probability that \(X_{n}=m\) given that the chain started at time 0 in state \(i\) and has not yet entered state \(r\) by time \(n\), where \(r\) is a specified state not equal to either \(i\) or \(m .\) We are interested in whether this conditional probability is equal to the \(n\) stage transition probability of a Markov chain whose state space does not include state \(r\) and whose transition probabilities are $$ Q_{i, j}=\frac{P_{i, j}}{1-P_{i, r}}, \quad i, j \neq r $$ Either prove the equality $$ P\left\\{X_{n}=m \mid X_{0}=i, X_{k} \neq r, k=1, \ldots, n\right\\}=Q_{i, m}^{n} $$ or construct a counterexample.

Consider a branching process having \(\mu<1\). Show that if \(X_{0}=1\), then the expected number of individuals that ever exist in this population is given by \(1 /(1-\mu)\). What if \(X_{0}=n ?\)

Coin 1 comes up heads with probability \(0.6\) and \(\operatorname{coin} 2\) with probability \(0.5 . \mathrm{A}\) coin is continually flipped until it comes up tails, at which time that coin is put aside and we start flipping the other one. (a) What proportion of flips use coin 1? (b) If we start the process with \(\operatorname{coin} 1\) what is the probability that \(\operatorname{coin} 2\) is used on the fifth flip?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free