Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

For a time reversible Markov chain, argue that the rate at which transitions from \(i\) to \(j\) to \(k\) occur must equal the rate at which transitions from \(k\) to \(j\) to \(i\) occur.

Short Answer

Expert verified
For a time-reversible Markov chain, the detailed balance condition states that \(\pi_i P_{ij} = \pi_j P_{ji}\). Using this property, we can express the transition rate from i to j to k as \(\pi_i P_{ij} P_{jk}\) and from k to j to i as \(\pi_k P_{kj} P_{ji}\). Applying detailed balance, we find that these two rates are equal, confirming the statement for the time-reversible Markov chain.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Time Reversibility

In a Markov chain, time reversibility means that the process behaves identically when the time direction is reversed. Mathematically, this can be expressed using the concept of detailed balance: \(\pi_i P_{ij} = \pi_j P_{ji}\) where \(\pi_i\) represents the stationary distribution (i.e., the probability of being in state i in the long run), \(P_{ij}\) refers to the probability of transitioning from state i to state j, and \(P_{ji}\) refers to the probability of transitioning from state j to state i. Now we want to show that the rate of transitions from i to j to k is equal to the rate of transitions from k to j to i.
02

Transition Rate from i to j to k

First, let's calculate the rate of transition transitions from i to j to k. Since we're dealing with discrete states, the transition rate can be defined as a product of transition probabilities and the probabilities to be in the corresponding state: Rate(i to j to k) = \(\pi_i P_{ij} P_{jk}\)
03

Transition Rate from k to j to i

Similarly, let's calculate the rate of transition transitions from k to j to i: Rate(k to j to i) = \(\pi_k P_{kj} P_{ji}\)
04

Applying Time Reversibility

Using the detailed balance condition explained in Step 1, we can substitute transition probabilities in the rate expressions: Rate(i to j to k) = \(\pi_i \frac{\pi_j P_{ji}}{\pi_i} \frac{\pi_k P_{jk}}{\pi_j} = \pi_k P_{kj} P_{ji}\) Comparing the expressions for the transition rate from i to j to k and the transition rate from k to j to i: \(\pi_k P_{kj} P_{ji} = \pi_k P_{kj} P_{ji}\) which shows that the rate of transitions from i to j to k is indeed equal to the rate of transitions from k to j to i, confirming the statement for the time-reversible Markov chain.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a Markov chain in steady state. Say that a \(k\) length run of zeroes ends at time \(m\) if $$ X_{m-k-1} \neq 0, \quad X_{m-k}=X_{m-k+1}=\ldots=X_{m-1}=0, X_{m} \neq 0 $$ Show that the probability of this event is \(\pi_{0}\left(P_{0,0}\right)^{k-1}\left(1-P_{0,0}\right)^{2}\), where \(\pi_{0}\) is the limiting probability of state 0 .

Consider the Ehrenfest urn model in which \(M\) molecules are distributed between two urns, and at each time point one of the molecules is chosen at random and is then removed from its urn and placed in the other one. Let \(X_{n}\) denote the number of molecules in urn 1 after the \(n\) th switch and let \(\mu_{n}=E\left[X_{n}\right]\). Show that (a) \(\mu_{n+1}=1+(1-2 / M) \mu_{n}\). (b) Use (a) to prove that $$ \mu_{n}=\frac{M}{2}+\left(\frac{M-2}{M}\right)^{n}\left(E\left[X_{0}\right]-\frac{M}{2}\right) $$

Suppose that on each play of the game a gambler either wins 1 with probability \(p\) or loses 1 with probability \(1-p\). The gambler continues betting until she or he is either up \(n\) or down \(m\). What is the probability that the gambler quits a winner?

Consider a branching process having \(\mu<1\). Show that if \(X_{0}=1\), then the expected number of individuals that ever exist in this population is given by \(1 /(1-\mu)\). What if \(X_{0}=n ?\)

Coin 1 comes up heads with probability \(0.6\) and \(\operatorname{coin} 2\) with probability \(0.5 . \mathrm{A}\) coin is continually flipped until it comes up tails, at which time that coin is put aside and we start flipping the other one. (a) What proportion of flips use coin 1? (b) If we start the process with \(\operatorname{coin} 1\) what is the probability that \(\operatorname{coin} 2\) is used on the fifth flip?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free