Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

\(M\) balls are initially distributed among \(m\) urns. At each stage one of the balls is selected at random, taken from whichever urn it is in, and then placed, at random, in one of the other \(M-1\) urns. Consider the Markov chain whose state at any time is the vector \(\left(n_{1}, \ldots, n_{m}\right)\) where \(n_{i}\) denotes the number of balls in urn \(i\). Guess at the limiting probabilities for this Markov chain and then verify your guess and show at the same time that the Markov chain is time reversible.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The limiting probabilities for the Markov chain with states \((n_1, n_2, \ldots, n_m)\) representing the number of balls in each urn are uniform, with each state having a probability of \(\frac{1}{\binom{M+m-1}{m-1}}\). The Markov chain is also time-reversible, as we have shown that for all states \(i\) and \(j\), \(P_{ij} = P_{ji}\).

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Markov chain and states

The Markov chain consists of states \((n_1, n_2, \ldots, n_m)\), with \(n_i\) representing the number of balls in urn \(i\). The initial state will be given, and then at each stage, one ball is selected randomly, taken from its original urn, and placed randomly in one of the other \(M-1\) urns.
02

Identifying the Transition Probabilities

Define the transition probability \(P_{ij}\) as the probability of going from state \(i\) to state \(j\). In this case, the transition probabilities are: 1. If a ball is taken from urn \(i\) and placed in urn \(j\), then the transition probability is given by \(\frac{n_i}{M} \cdot \frac{1}{M-1}\) (probability of selecting a ball from urn \(i\) times the probability of placing the ball in urn \(j\)). 2. If there is no change in the state, the transition probability is given by \(1-\sum_{i\neq j} P_{ij}\).
03

Guessing the Limiting Probabilities

Let's assume the limiting probability for state \((n_1, n_2, \ldots, n_m)\) is given by \(\pi\left(n_1, n_2, \ldots, n_m\right)\). We can guess that the limiting probabilities are uniform (equal) because each urn has equal chances of gaining and losing balls in the long run. Therefore, each state has a limiting probability of \(\frac{1}{\binom{M+m-1}{m-1}}\).
04

Show Time Reversibility

A Markov chain is time-reversible if \(\pi_i P_{ij} = \pi_j P_{ji}\) for all states \(i\) and \(j\). If the limiting probabilities are uniform, then \(\pi_i = \pi_j = \frac{1}{\binom{M+m-1}{m-1}}\), and hence, this condition simplifies to: \[P_{ij} = P_{ji}\] Using the transition probabilities we identified earlier in Step 2: \[\frac{n_i}{M} \cdot \frac{1}{M-1} = \frac{n_j}{M} \cdot \frac{1}{M-1}\] Since the denominator is equal on both sides, we can rearrange for \(n_i\) and \(n_j\): \[n_i = n_j\] The time reversibility condition holds for all states \(i\) and \(j\), which confirms that the Markov chain is time-reversible.
05

Conclusion

The limiting probabilities for the given Markov chain are uniform, with each state having a probability of \(\frac{1}{\binom{M+m-1}{m-1}}\). Additionally, the Markov chain is time-reversible, as we have shown that the time reversibility condition holds for all states.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let the transition probability matrix of a two-state Markov chain be given, as in Example 4.2, by $$ \mathbf{P}=\left\|\begin{array}{cc} p & 1-p \\ 1-p & p \end{array}\right\| $$ Show by mathematical induction that $$ \mathbf{P}^{(n)}=\left\|\begin{array}{|ll} \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}(2 p-1)^{n} & \frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}(2 p-1)^{n} \\ \frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}(2 p-1)^{n} & \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}(2 p-1)^{n} \end{array}\right\| $$

Each day, one of \(n\) possible elements is requested, the ith one with probability \(P_{i}, i \geqslant 1, \sum_{1}^{n} P_{i}=1\). These elements are at all times arranged in an ordered list that is revised as follows: The element selected is moved to the front of the list with the relative positions of all the other elements remaining unchanged. Define the state at any time to be the list ordering at that time and note that there are \(n !\) possible states. (a) Argue that the preceding is a Markov chain. (b) For any state \(i_{1}, \ldots, i_{n}\) (which is a permutation of \(\left.1,2, \ldots, n\right)\), let \(\pi\left(i_{1}, \ldots, i_{n}\right)\) denote the limiting probability. In order for the state to be \(i_{1}, \ldots, i_{n}\), it is necessary for the last request to be for \(i_{1}\), the last non- \(i_{1}\) request for \(i_{2}\), the last non- \(i_{1}\) or \(i_{2}\) request for \(i_{3}\), and so on. Hence, it appears intuitive that $$ \pi\left(i_{1}, \ldots, i_{n}\right)=P_{i_{1}} \frac{P_{i_{2}}}{1-P_{i_{1}}} \frac{P_{i_{3}}}{1-P_{i_{1}}-P_{i_{2}}} \cdots \frac{P_{i_{n-1}}}{1-P_{i_{1}}-\cdots-P_{i_{n-2}}} $$ Verify when \(n=3\) that the preceding are indeed the limiting probabilities.

Consider a population of individuals each of whom possesses two genes that can be either type \(A\) or type \(a\). Suppose that in outward appearance type \(A\) is dominant and type \(a\) is recessive. (That is, an individual will have only the outward characteristics of the recessive gene if its pair is aa.) Suppose that the population has stabilized, and the percentages of individuals having respective gene pairs \(A A, a a\), and \(A a\) are \(p, q\), and \(r .\) Call an individual dominant or recessive depending on the outward characteristics it exhibits. Let \(S_{11}\) denote the probability that an offspring of two dominant parents will be recessive; and let \(S_{10}\) denote the probability that the offspring of one dominant and one recessive parent will be recessive. Compute \(S_{11}\) and \(S_{10}\) to show that \(S_{11}=S_{10}^{2} .\) (The quantities \(S_{10}\) and \(S_{11}\) are known in the genetics literature as Snyder's ratios.)

Coin 1 comes up heads with probability \(0.6\) and \(\operatorname{coin} 2\) with probability \(0.5 . \mathrm{A}\) coin is continually flipped until it comes up tails, at which time that coin is put aside and we start flipping the other one. (a) What proportion of flips use coin 1? (b) If we start the process with \(\operatorname{coin} 1\) what is the probability that \(\operatorname{coin} 2\) is used on the fifth flip?

Suppose that a population consists of a fixed number, say, \(m\), of genes in any generation. Each gene is one of two possible genetic types. If exactly \(i\) (of the \(m\) ) genes of any generation are of type 1 , then the next generation will have \(j\) type 1 (and \(m-j\) type 2 ) genes with probability $$ \left(\begin{array}{c} m \\ j \end{array}\right)\left(\frac{i}{m}\right)^{j}\left(\frac{m-i}{m}\right)^{m-j}, \quad j=0,1, \ldots, m $$ Let \(X_{n}\) denote the number of type 1 genes in the \(n\) th generation, and assume that \(X_{0}=i\) (a) Find \(E\left[X_{n}\right]\). (b) What is the probability that eventually all the genes will be type \(1 ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free