Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Each morning an individual leaves his house and goes for a run. He is equally likely to leave either from his front or back door. Upon leaving the house, he chooses a pair of running shoes (or goes running barefoot if there are no shoes at the door from which he departed). On his return he is equally likely to enter, and leave his running shoes, either by the front or back door. If he owns a total of \(k\) pairs of running shoes, what proportion of the time does he run barefooted?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The individual never runs barefooted, as there must always be running shoes present at either the front door or the back door. The probability of running barefoot is 0.

Step by step solution

01

Represent the total number of running shoes and distribution of running shoes

Let k be the total number of running shoes. And let x be the number of running shoes present at the front door and y be the number of running shoes present at the back door. Therefore, \(k=x+y\) as all running shoes are distributed between the front and back doors.
02

Calculate the probability of selecting a door

Since the individual is equally likely to leave from the front or the back door, the probability of selecting a door can be denoted as: - Probability of choosing the front door: \(P(F) = \frac{1}{2}\) - Probability of choosing the back door: \(P(B) = \frac{1}{2}\)
03

Calculate the probabilities of finding no running shoes at the selected door

The probability of finding no running shoes at the front door with x running shoes is: \(P(\text{No Shoes} | F) = \frac{0}{x} = 0\) The probability of finding no running shoes at the back door with y running shoes is: \(P(\text{No Shoes} | B) = \frac{0}{y} = 0\)
04

Calculate the overall probability of running barefoot

We will now combine the probability of choosing a door with the probability of finding no running shoes at that chosen door. For this, we will use the total probability theorem: \(P(\text{No Shoes}) = P(\text{No Shoes} | F) \times P(F) + P(\text{No Shoes} | B) \times P(B)\) Plugging in the numbers, we get: \(P(\text{No Shoes}) = 0 \times \frac{1}{2} + 0 \times \frac{1}{2}\) \(P(\text{No Shoes}) = 0\) The answer is 0, meaning that he never runs barefooted, as there must always be running shoes present at either the front door or the back door.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A Markov chain is said to be a tree process if (i) \(\quad P_{i j}>0\) whenever \(P_{j i}>0\), (ii) for every pair of states \(i\) and \(j, i \neq j\), there is a unique sequence of distinct states \(i=i_{0}, i_{1}, \ldots, i_{n-1}, i_{n}=j\) such that $$ P_{i_{k}, i_{k+1}}>0, \quad k=0,1, \ldots, n-1 $$ In other words, a Markov chain is a tree process if for every pair of distinct states \(i\) and \(j\) there is a unique way for the process to go from \(i\) to \(j\) without reentering a state (and this path is the reverse of the unique path from \(j\) to \(i\) ). Argue that an ergodic tree process is time reversible.

Suppose in the gambler's ruin problem that the probability of winning a bet depends on the gambler's present fortune. Specifically, suppose that \(\alpha_{i}\) is the probability that the gambler wins a bet when his or her fortune is \(i\). Given that the gambler's initial fortune is \(i\), let \(P(i)\) denote the probability that the gambler's fortune reaches \(N\) before 0 . (a) Derive a formula that relates \(P(i)\) to \(P(i-1)\) and \(P(i+1)\). (b) Using the same approach as in the gambler's ruin problem, solve the equation of part (a) for \(P(i)\) (c) Suppose that \(i\) balls are initially in urn 1 and \(N-i\) are in urn 2, and suppose that at each stage one of the \(N\) balls is randomly chosen, taken from whichever urn it is in, and placed in the other urn. Find the probability that the first urn becomes empty before the second.

Prove that if the number of states in a Markov chain is \(M\), and if state \(j\) can be reached from state \(i\), then it can be reached in \(M\) steps or less.

For a branching process, calculate \(\pi_{0}\) when (a) \(P_{0}=\frac{1}{4}, P_{2}=\frac{3}{4}\). (b) \(P_{0}=\frac{1}{4}, P_{1}=\frac{1}{2}, P_{2}=\frac{1}{4}\). (c) \(P_{0}=\frac{1}{6}, P_{1}=\frac{1}{2}, P_{3}=\frac{1}{3}\).

At all times, an urn contains \(N\) balls?-some white balls and some black balls. At each stage, a coin having probability \(p, 0

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free