Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In a good weather year the number of storms is Poisson distributed with mean \(1 ;\) in a bad year it is Poisson distributed with mean 3. Suppose that any year's weather conditions depends on past years only through the previous year's condition. Suppose that a good year is equally likely to be followed by either a good or a bad year, and that a bad year is twice as likely to be followed by a bad year as by a good year. Suppose that last year-call it year 0 -was a good year. (a) Find the expected total number of storms in the next two years (that is, in years 1 and 2 ). (b) Find the probability there are no storms in year 3 . (c) Find the long-run average number of storms per year.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The expected total number of storms in the next two years (years 1 and 2) is 4. The probability there are no storms in year 3 is approximately \(\frac{99e^{-1}+71e^{-3}}{216}\). The long-run average number of storms per year is \(\frac{9}{5}\).

Step by step solution

01

Define the random variables and probabilities

Let's denote the number of storms in a good year as \(X_1\), and the number of storms in a bad year as \(X_2\). Then, \(X_1 \sim Poisson(1)\) and \(X_2 \sim Poisson(3)\). We are also given the transition probabilities: \(P(Good_{n+1}|Good_n) = P(Bad_{n+1}|Bad_n) = \frac{1}{2}\) \(P(Good_{n+1}|Bad_n) = \frac{1}{3}\) and \(P(Bad_{n+1}|Good_n) = \frac{2}{3}\).
02

Calculate the expected total number of storms in the next two years

To find the total number of storms in years 1 and 2, we first need to consider the possible weather conditions for those years. Since year 0 was a good year, we have the following possibilities, with their respective probabilities: 1. Good, Good: with probability \(\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{4}\) 2. Good, Bad: with probability \(\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{2}{3} = \frac{1}{3}\) 3. Bad, Good: with probability \(\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{3} = \frac{1}{6}\) 4. Bad, Bad: with probability \(\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{2}{3} = \frac{1}{3}\) Now, we calculate the expected number of storms for each case and sum them up with their respective probabilities: Total expected storms = \(\frac{1}{4}E[X_1 + X_1] + \frac{1}{3}E[X_1 + X_2] + \frac{1}{6}E[X_2 + X_1] + \frac{1}{3}E[X_2 + X_2]\) For Poisson distributions, the sum of two independent Poisson random variables with parameters \(\lambda_1\) and \(\lambda_2\) is also a Poisson random variable with parameter \(\lambda_1 + \lambda_2\). Therefore, we have: \(E[X_1 + X_1] = E[Poisson(1+1)] = 2\), \(E[X_1 + X_2] = E[Poisson(1+3)] = 4\), \(E[X_2 + X_1] = E[Poisson(3+1)] = 4\), and \(E[X_2 + X_2] = E[Poisson(3+3)] = 6\). Total expected storms = \(\frac{1}{4}(2)+\frac{1}{3}(4)+\frac{1}{6}(4)+\frac{1}{3}(6)=\frac{1}{2}+\frac{4}{3}+\frac{2}{3}+2=4\) Thus, the expected total number of storms in the next two years is 4.
03

Calculate the probability there are no storms in year 3

The probability of no storms in year 3 depends on the weather conditions in year 2, which in turn depends on the weather conditions in year 1. We can calculate the probability of no storms in year 3 by considering both possible weather conditions in year 3: \(P(X_1=0)\) (Good) and \(P(X_2=0)\) (Bad): \(P(No\_storms\_in\_y3)=P(X_1=0|X_1=0)P(Year\_1|=Good)+P(X_1=0|X_1=1)P(Year\_1|=Bad)+P(X_2=0|X_2=0)P(Year\_2|=Good)+P(X_2=0|X_2=1)P(Year\_2|=Bad)\) Using the transition probabilities and the probability mass function of the Poisson distribution, we can substitute the values: \(P(No\_storms\_in\_y3)=e^{-1}\frac{1}{2}(1-\frac{1}{2}e^{-1})+e^{-1}\frac{1}{3}(1-\frac{1}{2}e^{-1})+e^{-3}\frac{1}{2}(1-\frac{1}{2}e^{-3})+e^{-3}\frac{2}{3}(1-\frac{1}{2}e^{-3})\) After simplifying, we get: \(P(No\_storms\_in\_y3)=\frac{99e^{-1}+71e^{-3}}{216}\)
04

Calculate the long-run average number of storms per year

We will need to calculate the stationary distribution of the transition probabilities matrix. This can be done by solving the following linear equations: \(\pi_G = \frac{1}{2}\pi_G + \frac{1}{3}\pi_B\) \(\pi_B = \frac{1}{2}\pi_G + \frac{2}{3}\pi_B\) \(\pi_G + \pi_B=1\) Solving the equations, we get: \(\pi_G=\frac{3}{5}\), and \(\pi_B=\frac{2}{5}\) The long-run average number of storms per year is then the sum of the expected number of storms per year in each weather condition, weighted by their stationary probabilities. Long-run average = \(\pi_GE[X_1] + \pi_GE[X_2] = \frac{3}{5}(1) + \frac{2}{5}(3) = \frac{9}{5}\) Thus, the long-run average number of storms per year is \(\frac{9}{5}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Probability Theory
Understanding probability theory is essential when dealing with stochastic phenomena like weather patterns and their impact on number of storms. Probability theory provides a mathematical framework for quantifying the uncertainty inherent in these phenomena. In our example, the number of storms in a given year is modeled using a Poisson distribution, which is commonly used for counting occurrences of events that happen independently at a constant average rate, such as storms in a year.

Considering the transition from one year to the next, we used given transition probabilities, which measure the likelihood of moving from one state (a good year or a bad year) to another. These probabilities help predict future weather patterns and, consequently, storms. To complete the exercise, we calculate expectations and probabilities using these transition probabilities which are fundamental components of probability theory.
Transition Probabilities
The concept of transition probabilities is a core component of Markov processes, where future states depend only on the current state and not on the sequence of events that preceded it. In our case, whether a year is good or bad depends only on the previous year, making this a simple Markov process. Given the transition probabilities, we can predict the likelihood of each sequence of weather conditions for the upcoming years, which in turn helps us determine the expected number of storms. To improve the understanding, creating a visual representation like a state diagram can be helpful in illustrating these transition probabilities between good and bad years.
Stationary Distribution
The stationary distribution of a Markov chain represents the long-term behavior of the system. It is the probability distribution over states that remains constant; in other words, once it is reached, the system tends to stay in that distribution over time, regardless of the initial state. In our exercise, the stationary distribution was found by solving a set of linear equations based on the given transition probabilities. This stationary distribution then gives us the long-run average number of storms per year, integrating over the fluctuations from year to year. Understanding the concept of stationary distribution is crucial for long-term predictions and planning in industries affected by weather, among other applications.
Expected Value
The expected value or mean of a random variable is a fundamental concept in probability and statistics, representing the average outcome if an experiment is repeated a large number of times. For Poisson distribution, the expected value is equal to its parameter, \( \lambda \). Therefore, for a good year (with \( \lambda = 1 \) ) the expected number of storms is 1, and for a bad year (with \( \lambda = 3 \) ), it's 3. The exercise involves calculating the expected number of storms over two years by weighting the expected values in good and bad years by their respective probabilities. Understanding how to find the expected value is vital in a wide range of fields, including insurance, finance, and any area dealing with risk and prediction.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A professor continually gives exams to her students. She can give three possible types of exams, and her class is graded as either having done well or badly. Let \(p_{i}\) denote the probability that the class does well on a type \(i\) exam, and suppose that \(p_{1}=0.3, p_{2}=0.6\), and \(p_{3}=0.9 .\) If the class does well on an exam, then the next exam is equally likely to be any of the three types. If the class does badly, then the next exam is always type \(1 .\) What proportion of exams are type \(i, i=1,2,3 ?\)

A Markov chain is said to be a tree process if (i) \(\quad P_{i j}>0\) whenever \(P_{j i}>0\), (ii) for every pair of states \(i\) and \(j, i \neq j\), there is a unique sequence of distinct states \(i=i_{0}, i_{1}, \ldots, i_{n-1}, i_{n}=j\) such that $$ P_{i_{k}, i_{k+1}}>0, \quad k=0,1, \ldots, n-1 $$ In other words, a Markov chain is a tree process if for every pair of distinct states \(i\) and \(j\) there is a unique way for the process to go from \(i\) to \(j\) without reentering a state (and this path is the reverse of the unique path from \(j\) to \(i\) ). Argue that an ergodic tree process is time reversible.

Three white and three black balls are distributed in two urns in such a way that each contains three balls. We say that the system is in state \(i, i=0,1,2,3\), if the first urn contains \(i\) white balls. At each step, we draw one ball from each urn and place the ball drawn from the first urn into the second, and conversely with the ball from the second urn. Let \(X_{n}\) denote the state of the system after the \(n\) th step. Explain why \(\left\\{X_{n}, n=0,1,2, \ldots\right\\}\) is a Markov chain and calculate its transition probability matrix.

Each individual in a population of size \(N\) is, in each period, either active or inactive. If an individual is active in a period then, independent of all else, that individual will be active in the next period with probability \(\alpha .\) Similarly, if an individual is inactive in a period then, independent of all else, that individual will be inactive in the next period with probability \(\beta .\) Let \(X_{n}\) denote the number of individuals that are active in period \(n\). (a) Argue that \(X_{n}, n \geqslant 0\) is a Markov chain. (b) Find \(E\left[X_{n} \mid X_{0}=i\right]\). (c) Derive an expression for its transition probabilities. (d) Find the long-run proportion of time that exactly \(j\) people are active. Hint for \((\mathrm{d}):\) Consider first the case where \(N=1\).

Each morning an individual leaves his house and goes for a run. He is equally likely to leave either from his front or back door. Upon leaving the house, he chooses a pair of running shoes (or goes running barefoot if there are no shoes at the door from which he departed). On his return he is equally likely to enter, and leave his running shoes, either by the front or back door. If he owns a total of \(k\) pairs of running shoes, what proportion of the time does he run barefooted?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free