Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(Y_{n}\) be the sum of \(n\) independent rolls of a fair die. Find \(\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} P\left\\{Y_{n}\right.\) is a multiple of 13\(\\}\) Hint: Define an appropriate Markov chain and apply the results of Exercise \(20 .\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The limit as \(n\) goes to infinity of the probability that the sum of \(n\) independent rolls of a fair die is a multiple of 13 is \(\frac{1}{13}\). This is obtained by defining a Markov chain with states representing the possible remainders when dividing the sum by 13 and finding its stationary distribution. The relevant probability in the stationary distribution will give us the desired limit.

Step by step solution

01

Define Markov Chain States and Transition Probabilities

Let us define our Markov chain states as \(S = \{0, 1, 2, ... , 11, 12\}\), representing possible remainders when we divide the sum of die rolls by 13. In this chain, we can transition from one state \(i\) to another state \((i+a) \mod 13\), where \(a\) is the value of the die roll from 1 to 6. All transition probabilities will be \(\frac{1}{6}\) since we have a fair die.
02

Construct the Transition Matrix

The transition matrix \(P\) for this Markov chain will be a 13x13 matrix. Each row represents the current state, and each column represents the next state. The element \(P_{ij}\) is the probability of transitioning from state \(i\) to state \(j\). For example, for state 0, we can go to states 1 to 6 with equal probability \(\frac{1}{6}\). For state 3, we can go to states 4 to 8 and back to states 0 and 1 with equal probability \(\frac{1}{6}\). This pattern will continue for all other state rows. Constructing this matrix \(P\) for the Markov chain: $$P = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & \frac{1}{6} & \frac{1}{6} & \frac{1}{6} & \frac{1}{6} & \frac{1}{6} & \frac{1}{6} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \frac{1}{6} & 0 & \frac{1}{6} & \frac{1}{6} & \frac{1}{6} & \frac{1}{6} & \frac{1}{6} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \ldots \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{6} & 0 & \frac{1}{6} & \frac{1}{6} & \frac{1}{6} & \frac{1}{6} & \frac{1}{6} & \frac{1}{6} \\ \end{bmatrix} $$
03

Find the Stationary Distribution

To find the stationary distribution \(\pi\), we need to solve the following equation: $$\pi P = \pi$$ Where the rows of \(\pi\) sum to 1. The stationary distribution gives us information about the long-term probabilities of being in each state. Solving this system of linear equations, we obtain: $$\pi = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{1}{13} & \frac{1}{13} & \frac{1}{13} & \frac{1}{13} & \frac{1}{13} & \frac{1}{13} & \frac{1}{13} & \frac{1}{13} & \frac{1}{13} & \frac{1}{13} & \frac{1}{13} & \frac{1}{13} & \frac{1}{13} \end{bmatrix}$$
04

Compute the Desired Limit

Now that we have the stationary distribution, we can compute the desired limit by finding the probability that \(Y_n\) is a multiple of 13 as \(n\) goes to infinity. In other words, we need the long-term probability of being in state 0, which corresponds to this event. From the stationary distribution, we get: $$\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} P\{Y_n \text{ is a multiple of } 13\} = \pi_0 = \frac{1}{13}$$

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Transition Matrix
A transition matrix is a square matrix that describes the transitions of a Markov chain between different states. Each entry in the transition matrix, denoted by a value such as \(P_{ij}\), represents the probability of moving from state \(i\) to state \(j\) in one time step.

Imagine a game board with various spots, each with an arrow directing you to another spot. That's analogous to a transition matrix in a Markov chain, where each spot on the board is a 'state,' and the arrows are the probabilities, guiding where you might go next. Just as each spot on the game board may have multiple or single arrows, each state may lead to multiple or one other states, with specific chances. The transition matrix collects all those individual probabilities into a handy grid, which we use to analyze the chain's behavior over time, like predicting long-term weather patterns given today's forecast.
Stationary Distribution
A stationary distribution is a special probability distribution for a Markov chain where the probabilities of being in each state do not change as time progresses. It's as if you've captured the essence of a buzzing beehive's activity into a single, forever snapshot. The distribution is 'stationary' because, unlike the frenzy inside a real hive, this statistical version remains constant over time.

Mathematically, for a stationary distribution \(\pi\), it satisfies the equation \(\pi P = \pi\), where \(P\) is the transition matrix. Finding this distribution is like solving a puzzle where the pieces are probabilities, and you're trying to set them in a way that no matter how they shuffle according to the transition matrix, they end up in the same configuration, eternally unchanged.
Probability Limit
The probability limit of a state in a Markov chain refers to the long-term behavior of the chain, specifically the probability of being in a certain state after a large number of steps. It's like watching a spinning top; no matter how it starts, eventually, it tends to wobble in a particular way just before it stops.

For these limits to exist, the Markov chain often needs to be ergodic, which means every state can eventually lead to every other state somehow. This property ensures that the probabilities stabilize after many transitions. In the case of our die-rolling exercise, we're interested in the probability limit of ending up at the 'multiple of 13' state as the number of dice rolls goes to infinity.
Linear Equations
Linear equations form the backbone of solving many problems in algebra, including finding stationary distributions in Markov chains. These equations are straightforward relationships between variables—like the balance in your savings account, assuming you add the same amount of money each month.

When we solve for the stationary distribution, we're setting up a system of linear equations that reflects the probability of staying in each state. It's akin to evenly distributing a set of goodies among several jars so that if you were to redistribute them according to certain rules (transition probabilities), each jar would end up with the same amount as before. By solving these linear equations, we can find this perfectly balanced distribution, which gives us valuable insights into long-term probabilities.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that if state \(i\) is recurrent and state \(i\) does not communicate with state \(j\), then \(P_{i j}=0 .\) This implies that once a process enters a recurrent class of states it can never leave that class. For this reason, a recurrent class is often referred to as a closed class.

Consider an irreducible finite Markov chain with states \(0,1, \ldots, N\). (a) Starting in state \(i\), what is the probability the process will ever visit state \(j\) ? Explain! (b) Let \(x_{i}=P\) [visit state \(N\) before state 0 |start in \(\left.i\right\\}\). Compute a set of linear equations that the \(x_{i}\) satisfy, \(i=0,1, \ldots, N\). (c) If \(\sum_{j} j P_{i j}=i\) for \(i=1, \ldots, N-1\), show that \(x_{i}=i / N\) is a solution to the equations in part (b).

Each day, one of \(n\) possible elements is requested, the ith one with probability \(P_{i}, i \geqslant 1, \sum_{1}^{n} P_{i}=1\). These elements are at all times arranged in an ordered list that is revised as follows: The element selected is moved to the front of the list with the relative positions of all the other elements remaining unchanged. Define the state at any time to be the list ordering at that time and note that there are \(n !\) possible states. (a) Argue that the preceding is a Markov chain. (b) For any state \(i_{1}, \ldots, i_{n}\) (which is a permutation of \(\left.1,2, \ldots, n\right)\), let \(\pi\left(i_{1}, \ldots, i_{n}\right)\) denote the limiting probability. In order for the state to be \(i_{1}, \ldots, i_{n}\), it is necessary for the last request to be for \(i_{1}\), the last non- \(i_{1}\) request for \(i_{2}\), the last non- \(i_{1}\) or \(i_{2}\) request for \(i_{3}\), and so on. Hence, it appears intuitive that $$ \pi\left(i_{1}, \ldots, i_{n}\right)=P_{i_{1}} \frac{P_{i_{2}}}{1-P_{i_{1}}} \frac{P_{i_{3}}}{1-P_{i_{1}}-P_{i_{2}}} \cdots \frac{P_{i_{n-1}}}{1-P_{i_{1}}-\cdots-P_{i_{n-2}}} $$ Verify when \(n=3\) that the preceding are indeed the limiting probabilities.

Let \(P^{(1)}\) and \(P^{(2)}\) denote transition probability matrices for ergodic Markov chains having the same state space. Let \(\pi^{1}\) and \(\pi^{2}\) denote the stationary (limiting) probability vectors for the two chains. Consider a process defined as follows: (a) \(X_{0}=1 .\) A coin is then flipped and if it comes up heads, then the remaining states \(X_{1}, \ldots\) are obtained from the transition probability matrix \(P^{(1)}\) and if tails from the matrix \(P^{(2)} .\) Is \(\left\\{X_{n}, n \geqslant 0\right\\}\) a Markov chain? If \(p=\) \(P\left\\{\right.\) coin comes up heads\\}, what is \(\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} P\left(X_{n}=i\right) ?\) (b) \(X_{0}=1\). At each stage the coin is flipped and if it comes up heads, then the next state is chosen according to \(P^{(1)}\) and if tails comes up, then it is chosen according to \(P^{(2)} .\) In this case do the successive states constitute a Markov chain? If so, determine the transition probabilities. Show by a counterexample that the limiting probabilities are not the same as in part (a).

A professor continually gives exams to her students. She can give three possible types of exams, and her class is graded as either having done well or badly. Let \(p_{i}\) denote the probability that the class does well on a type \(i\) exam, and suppose that \(p_{1}=0.3, p_{2}=0.6\), and \(p_{3}=0.9 .\) If the class does well on an exam, then the next exam is equally likely to be any of the three types. If the class does badly, then the next exam is always type \(1 .\) What proportion of exams are type \(i, i=1,2,3 ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free