Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be independent random variables having a common distribution function that is specified up to an unknown parameter \(\theta\). Let \(T=T(\mathrm{X})\) be a function of the data \(\mathrm{X}=\left(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\right) .\) If the conditional distribution of \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\) given \(T(\mathrm{X})\) does not depend on \(\theta\) then \(T(\mathrm{X})\) is said to be a sufficient statistic for \(\theta .\) In the following cases, show that \(T(\mathbf{X})=\sum_{i=1}^{n} X_{i}\) is a sufficient statistic for \(\theta\). (a) The \(X_{i}\) are normal with mean \(\theta\) and variance \(1 .\) (b) The density of \(X_{i}\) is \(f(x)=\theta e^{-\theta x}, x>0\). (c) The mass function of \(X_{i}\) is \(p(x)=\theta^{x}(1-\theta)^{1-x}, x=0,1,0<\theta<1\). (d) The \(X_{i}\) are Poisson random variables with mean \(\theta\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, we have shown that in all four cases, \(T(\mathbf{X}) = \sum_{i=1}^n X_i\) is a sufficient statistic for the parameter \(\theta\) using the Factorization Theorem. The specific factorizations for each case are: (a) \(f(x_1, x_2, ... x_n ; \theta) = e^{\theta T(\mathbf{X}) - \theta^2n/2} \cdot \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{n/2}}e^{-\sum_{i=1}^n X_i^2/2}\) (b) \(f(x_1, x_2, ... x_n ; \theta) = \theta^n e^{-\theta T(\mathbf{X})} \cdot 1\) (c) \(f(x_1, x_2, ... x_n ; \theta) = \theta^{T(\mathbf{X})}(1-\theta)^{n-T(\mathbf{X})} \cdot 1\) (d) \(f(x_1, x_2, ... x_n ; \theta) = e^{-n\theta}\theta^{T(\mathbf{X})} \cdot \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{x_i!}\)

Step by step solution

01

a) Normal Distribution

In this case, the \(X_i\) are normally distributed with mean \(\theta\) and variance \(1.\) The joint probability density function of the data can be written as: \[f(x_1, x_2, ... x_n ; \theta) = \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-(x_i - \theta)^2/2}\] Now, we'll try to find the factorization of this function that separates the data and the statistic. Let \(T(\mathbf{X}) = \sum_{i=1}^n X_i\), so we can rewrite the function as: \[f(x_1, x_2, ... x_n ; \theta) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{n/2}} e^{\theta T(\mathbf{X}) - \theta^2n/2 - \sum_{i=1}^n X_i^2/2}\] Comparing the given function with the factorization result form, we can see that it can be factored as: \[ g(T(\mathbf{X});\theta) = e^{\theta T(\mathbf{X}) - \theta^2n/2} \qquad \text{and} \qquad h(\mathbf{X}) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{n/2}}e^{-\sum_{i=1}^n X_i^2/2}\] As we have found a factorization of the density function of the form \(f(x_1, x_2, ... x_n ; \theta) = g(T(\mathbf{X});\theta) h(\mathbf{X})\), the factorization theorem states that \(T(\mathbf{X}) = \sum_{i=1}^n X_i\) is a sufficient statistic for \(\theta\) in this normal case.
02

b) Exponential Distribution

In this case, the random variables have a density function, \(f(x)=\theta e^{-\theta x}, x>0\). Therefore, the joint probability density function can be written as: \[f(x_1, x_2, ... x_n ; \theta) = \prod_{i=1}^n \theta e^{-\theta x_i}\] which simplifies to: \[f(x_1, x_2, ... x_n ; \theta) = \theta^n e^{-\theta\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}\] This function can be factored as: \[ g(T(\mathbf{X});\theta) = \theta^n e^{-\theta T(\mathbf{X})} \qquad \text{and} \qquad h(\mathbf{X}) = 1\] where \(T(\mathbf{X}) = \sum_{i=1}^n X_i\). As the function can be factored in the required form, the factorization theorem implies that \(T(\mathbf{X}) = \sum_{i=1}^n X_i\) is a sufficient statistic for \(\theta\) in this case.
03

c) Bernoulli Distribution

In this case, the mass function for \(X_i\) is \(p(x)=\theta^{x}(1-\theta)^{1-x}, x=0,1,0<\theta<1\). The joint probability mass function can be written as: \[f(x_1, x_2, ... x_n ; \theta) = \prod_{i=1}^n \theta^{x_i}(1-\theta)^{1-x_i}\] which simplifies to: \[f(x_1, x_2, ... x_n ; \theta) = \theta^{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i} (1-\theta)^{n-\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}\] This function can be factored as: \[g(T(\mathbf{X});\theta) = \theta^{T(\mathbf{X})}(1-\theta)^{n-T(\mathbf{X})} \qquad \text{and} \qquad h(\mathbf{X}) = 1\] where \(T(\mathbf{X}) = \sum_{i=1}^n X_i\). As the function can be factored in the required form, the factorization theorem implies that \(T(\mathbf{X}) = \sum_{i=1}^n X_i\) is a sufficient statistic for \(\theta\) in this case.
04

d) Poisson Distribution

In this case, the \(X_i\) are Poisson distributed with mean \(\theta\), and the probability mass function for \(X_i\) is: \[p(x_i) = \frac{e^{-\theta}\theta^{x_i}}{x_i!}\] The joint probability mass function can be written as: \[f(x_1, x_2, ... x_n ; \theta) = \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{e^{-\theta}\theta^{x_i}}{x_i!}\] which simplifies to: \[f(x_1, x_2, ... x_n ; \theta) = e^{-n\theta}\theta^{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}\prod_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{x_i!}\] The function can be factored as: \[g(T(\mathbf{X});\theta) = e^{-n\theta}\theta^{T(\mathbf{X})} \qquad \text{and} \qquad h(\mathbf{X}) = \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{x_i!}\] where \(T(\mathbf{X}) = \sum_{i=1}^n X_i\). As the function can be factored in the required form, the factorization theorem implies that \(T(\mathbf{X}) = \sum_{i=1}^n X_i\) is a sufficient statistic for \(\theta\) in this case. In summary, we have shown that in all four cases, \(T(\mathbf{X}) = \sum_{i=1}^n X_i\) is a sufficient statistic for the parameter \(θ\) using the Factorization Theorem.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a gambler who on each bet either wins 1 with probability \(18 / 38\) or loses 1 with probability \(20 / 38\). (These are the probabilities if the bet is that a roulette wheel will land on a specified color.) The gambler will quit either when he or she is winning a total of 5 or after 100 plays. What is the probability he or she plays exactly 15 times? Sh

An individual traveling on the real line is trying to reach the origin. However, the larger the desired step, the greater is the variance in the result of that step. Specifically, whenever the person is at location \(x\), he next moves to a location having mean 0 and variance \(\beta x^{2}\). Let \(X_{n}\) denote the position of the individual after having taken \(n\) steps. Supposing that \(X_{0}=x_{0}\), find (a) \(E\left[X_{n}\right]\); (b) \(\operatorname{Var}\left(X_{n}\right)\)

Find the expected number of flips of a coin, which comes up heads with probability \(p\), that are necessary to obtain the pattern \(h, t, h, h, t, h, t, h\).

If \(R_{i}\) denotes the random amount that is earned in period \(i\), then \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \beta^{i-1} R_{i}\), where \(0<\beta<1\) is a specified constant, is called the total discounted reward with discount factor \(\beta .\) Let \(T\) be a geometric random variable with parameter \(1-\beta\) that is independent of the \(R_{i} .\) Show that the expected total discounted reward is equal to the expected total (undiscounted) reward earned by time \(T\). That is, show that $$ E\left[\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \beta^{i-1} R_{i}\right]=E\left[\sum_{i=1}^{T} R_{i}\right] $$

A deck of \(n\) cards, numbered 1 through \(n\), is randomly shuffled so that all \(n !\) possible permutations are equally likely. The cards are then turned over one at a time until card number 1 appears. These upturned cards constitute the first cycle. We now determine (by looking at the upturned cards) the lowest numbered card that has not yet appeared, and we continue to turn the cards face up until that card appears. This new set of cards represents the second cycle. We again determine the lowest numbered of the remaining cards and turn the cards until it appears, and so on until all cards have been turned over. Let \(m_{n}\) denote the mean number of cycles. (a) Derive a recursive formula for \(m_{n}\) in terms of \(m_{k}, k=1, \ldots, n-1\). (b) Starting with \(m_{0}=0\), use the recursion to find \(m_{1}, m_{2}, m_{3}\), and \(m_{4}\). (c) Conjecture a general formula for \(m_{n}\). (d) Prove your formula by induction on \(n\). That is, show it is valid for \(n=1\), then assume it is true for any of the values \(1, \ldots, n-1\) and show that this implies it is true for \(n\). (e) Let \(X_{i}\) equal 1 if one of the cycles ends with card \(i\), and let it equal 0 otherwise, \(i=1, \ldots, n\). Express the number of cycles in terms of these \(X_{i}\). (f) Use the representation in part (e) to determine \(m_{n}\). (g) Are the random variables \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\) independent? Explain. (h) Find the variance of the number of cycles.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free