Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

If \(U_{1}, U_{2}, U_{3}\) are independent uniform \((0,1)\) random variables, find \(P\left(\prod_{i=1}^{3} U_{i}>0.1\right)\) Hint: Relate the desired probability to one about a Poisson process.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The desired probability is \(P\left(\prod_{i=1}^{3} U_{i}>0.1\right) = \boxed{\frac{1}{2}}\).

Step by step solution

01

Take the natural logarithm of the inequality

We need to find the probability \(P(\prod_{i=1}^{3} U_{i}>0.1)\). First, let's take the natural logarithms of both sides of the inequality \[\ln(\prod_{i=1}^{3} U_{i}) > \ln(0.1)\] Since \(\ln(xy) = \ln(x) + \ln(y)\) for random variables \(x\) and \(y\), we get: \[\ln(U_1) + \ln(U_2) + \ln(U_3) > \ln(0.1)\]
02

Define Poisson process for each logarithm

We will now define a new set of variables \(Y_{1}, Y_{2}, Y_{3}\) as: \[Y_i = -\ln(U_i)\] We are given that \(U_{1}\), \(U_{2}\), and \(U_{3}\) are independent, so the \(Y_i\) are also independent. Now, our inequality becomes: \[-Y_1 - Y_2 - Y_3 > -\ln(0.1)\] Taking the negation of this inequality: \[Y_1 + Y_2 + Y_3 < \ln(10)\] Now we need to evaluate the cumulative distribution functions \(F_{Y_i}(y)\) for \(i = 1, 2, 3\).
03

Find the cumulative distribution functions of new random variables

To find the cumulative distribution functions of \(Y_i\), we will first find their probability density functions: For \(y \geq 0\), \[F_{Y_i}(y) = P(Y_i \leq y) = P(-\ln(U_i) \leq y) \] \[= P(\ln(U_i) \geq -y) = P(U_i \geq e^{-y})\] Since \(U_i\) is a uniform random variable, \[F_{U_i}(u) = u\] Now let's substitute this into the above equation: \[F_{Y_i}(y) = P(U_i \geq e^{-y}) = 1 - F_{U_i}(e^{-y}) = 1 - e^{-y}\] To find the probability density function \(f_{Y_i}(y)\), we can differentiate the cumulative distribution function: \[f_{Y_i}(y) = \frac{d}{dy} F_{Y_i}(y) = e^{-y}\]
04

Find the joint distribution function

Since \(Y_1\), \(Y_2\), and \(Y_3\) are independent, we can find the joint distribution function by multiplying their individual distributions: \[f_{Y_1,Y_2,Y_3}(y_1,y_2,y_3) = f_{Y_1}(y_1)f_{Y_2}(y_2)f_{Y_3}(y_3) = e^{-y_1}e^{-y_2}e^{-y_3} = e^{-(y_1+y_2+y_3)}\] Now we can find the desired probability: \[P(Y_1+Y_2+Y_3 < \ln(10)) = \int_0^{\ln(10)} \int_0^{\ln(10)-y_1} \int_0^{\ln(10)-y_1-y_2} f_{Y_1,Y_2,Y_3}(y_1,y_2,y_3) dy_3 dy_2 dy_1\]
05

Evaluate the integral

Now, let's evaluate the integral to find the desired probability: \[P(Y_1+Y_2+Y_3 < \ln(10)) = \int_0^{\ln(10)} \int_0^{\ln(10)-y_1} \int_0^{\ln(10)-y_1-y_2} e^{-(y_1+y_2+y_3)} dy_3 dy_2 dy_1\] \[=\int_0^{\ln(10)} \int_0^{\ln(10)-y_1} e^{-(y_1+y_2)}\left[ 1 - e^{-(\ln(10)-y_1-y_2)} \right] dy_2 dy_1\] \[=\int_0^{\ln(10)} \int_0^{\ln(10)-y_1} \left[e^{-(y_1+y_2)} - e^{-\ln(10)}\right] dy_2 dy_1\] \[= 1 - e^{-\ln(10)}\int_0^{\ln(10)} \int_0^{\ln(10)-y_1} dy_2 dy_1\] \[= 1 - e^{-\ln(10)}\int_0^{\ln(10)} (\ln(10)-y_1) dy_1 \] \[= 1 - e^{-\ln(10)}\left[\ln^2(10)-\frac{1}{2}\ln^2(10)\right] = 1 - \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{2}\] Therefore, the desired probability is \(P\left(\prod_{i=1}^{3} U_{i}>0.1\right) = \boxed{\frac{1}{2}}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If \(0 \leqslant X \leqslant a\), show that (a) \(E\left[X^{2}\right] \leqslant a E[X]\) (b) \(\operatorname{Var}(X) \leqslant E[X](a-E[X])\) (c) \(\operatorname{Var}(X) \leqslant a^{2} / 4\).

Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be independent random variables with \(E\left[X_{i}\right]=\theta, \operatorname{Var}\left(X_{i}\right)=\sigma_{i}^{2}\) \(i=1, \ldots, n\), and consider estimates of \(\theta\) of the form \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} \lambda_{i} X_{i}\) where \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} \lambda_{i}=1\). Show that \(\operatorname{Var}\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} \lambda_{i} X_{i}\right)\) is minimized when $$\lambda_{i}=\left(1 / \sigma_{i}^{2}\right) /\left(\sum_{j=1}^{n} 1 / \sigma_{j}^{2}\right), \quad i=1, \ldots, n$$ Possible Hint: If you cannot do this for general \(n\), try it first when \(n=2\). The following two problems are concerned with the estimation of \(\int_{0}^{1} g(x) d x=E[g(U)]\) where \(U\) is uniform \((0,1)\).

Show that if \(X\) and \(Y\) have the same distribution then $$ \operatorname{Var}((X+Y) / 2) \leqslant \operatorname{Var}(X) $$ Hence, conclude that the use of antithetic variables can never increase variance (though it need not be as efficient as generating an independent set of random numbers).

Suppose it is relatively easy to simulate from the distributions \(F_{i}, i=1,2, \ldots, n .\) If \(n\) is small, how can we simulate from $$ F(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{n} P_{i} F_{i}(x), \quad P_{i} \geqslant 0, \quad \sum_{i} P_{i}=1 ? $$ Give a method for simulating from $$ F(x)=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll} \frac{1-e^{-2 x}+2 x}{3}, & 0

Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be independent exponential random variables each having rate 1 . Set $$ \begin{aligned} &W_{1}=X_{1} / n \\ &W_{i}=W_{i-1}+\frac{X_{i}}{n-i+1}, \quad i=2, \ldots, n \end{aligned} $$ Explain why \(W_{1}, \ldots, W_{n}\) has the same joint distribution as the order statistics of a sample of \(n\) exponentials each having rate 1 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free