Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \((X, Y)\) be uniformly distributed in a circle of radius \(r\) about the origin. That is, their joint density is given by $$ f(x, y)=\frac{1}{\pi r^{2}}, \quad 0 \leqslant x^{2}+y^{2} \leqslant r^{2} $$ Let \(R=\sqrt{X^{2}+Y^{2}}\) and \(\theta=\arctan Y / X\) denote their polar coordinates. Show that \(R\) and \(\theta\) are independent with \(\theta\) being uniform on \((0,2 \pi)\) and \(P\\{R

Short Answer

Expert verified
In conclusion, the polar coordinates \(R\) and \(\theta\) are not independent for the given uniformly distributed point \((X,Y)\) in a circle of radius \(r\) about the origin. The distribution of \(\theta\) is uniform on the interval \((0, 2\pi)\), and the probability that \(R < a\) for \(0 < a < r\) is given by \(P\{R<a\} = \frac{a^2}{r^2}\).

Step by step solution

01

Obtain the Jacobian of the transformation from Cartesian coordinates to polar coordinates

To find the marginal densities of \(R\) and \(\theta\), we need to find the Jacobian of the transformation from the Cartesian coordinates \((x,y)\) to the polar coordinates \((R,\theta)\), which can be obtained by calculating the determinants of the partial derivatives of the functions \(x(R,\theta) = R\cos \theta\) and \(y(R,\theta) = R\sin \theta\). Calculate the Jacobian as follows: \[ J(R, \theta) = \begin{vmatrix} \frac{\partial x}{\partial R} & \frac{\partial x}{\partial \theta} \\ \frac{\partial y}{\partial R} & \frac{\partial y}{\partial \theta} \end{vmatrix} = \begin{vmatrix} \cos \theta & -R\sin \theta \\ \sin \theta & R\cos \theta \end{vmatrix} = R(\cos^2 \theta + \sin^2 \theta) = R \]
02

Calculate the joint density of \(R\) and \(\theta\)

Now we can obtain the joint density of \(R\) and \(\theta\) by using the Jacobian transformation formula for the probability density function: \[ g(R, \theta) = f(x(R, \theta), y(R, \theta))|J(R, \theta)| = \frac{1}{\pi r^2} R \]
03

Obtain the marginal densities of \(R\) and \(\theta\)

With the joint density of \(R\) and \(\theta\) available, we can now calculate the marginal densities. For \(R\), integrate the joint density function as follows: \[ g_R(R) = \int_0^{2\pi} g(R, \theta) d\theta = \frac{R}{\pi r^2} \int_0^{2\pi} d\theta = \frac{2\pi R}{\pi r^2} = \frac{2 R}{r^2} \quad\text{for}\, 0 \leq R \leq r \] For \(\theta\), integrate the joint density function: \[ g_\theta(\theta) = \int_0^r g(R, \theta) dR = \frac{1}{\pi r^2} \int_0^r R^2 dR = \frac{1}{3\pi}r^2 \quad\text{for}\, 0 \leq \theta \leq 2\pi \]
04

Show the independence of \(R\) and \(\theta\)

Now that we have the marginal densities of \(R\) and \(\theta\), we can show their independence by checking if the joint density of \(R\) and \(\theta\) is equal to the product of their marginal densities. \[ g_R(R)g_\theta(\theta) = \frac{2 R}{r^2} \cdot \frac{1}{3\pi}r^2 = \frac{2 R}{6\pi} = \frac{R}{3\pi} \] Comparing this result with the joint density we calculated in Step 2, we notice that \(g_R(R)g_\theta(\theta) \neq g(R, \theta)\). Hence, \(R\) and \(\theta\) are not independent.
05

Calculate \(P\{R < a\}\)

Finally, we calculate the probability that \(R < a\) for \(0 < a < r\). To do this, integrate the function \(g_R(R)\) (density of \(R\)) over the interval \((0, a)\) to find the cumulative distribution function of \(R\). \[ P\{R<a\} = \int_0^a g_R(R) dR = \int_0^a \frac{2 R}{r^2} dR = \frac{2}{r^2} \int_0^a R dR = \frac{a^2}{r^2} \] Thus, the probability that \(R < a\) is \(\frac{a^2}{r^2}\) for \(0 < a < r\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Give a method for simulating a negative binomial random variable.

Suppose it is relatively easy to simulate from \(F_{i}\) for each \(i=1, \ldots, n .\) How can we simulate from (a) \(\quad F(x)=\prod_{i=1}^{n} F_{i}(x) ?\) (b) \(F(x)=1-\prod_{i=1}^{n}\left(1-F_{i}(x)\right) ?\) (c) Give two methods for simulating from the distribution \(F(x)=x^{n}, 0

Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be independent exponential random variables each having rate 1 . Set $$ \begin{aligned} &W_{1}=X_{1} / n \\ &W_{i}=W_{i-1}+\frac{X_{i}}{n-i+1}, \quad i=2, \ldots, n \end{aligned} $$ Explain why \(W_{1}, \ldots, W_{n}\) has the same joint distribution as the order statistics of a sample of \(n\) exponentials each having rate 1 .

Consider the technique of simulating a gamma \((n, \lambda)\) random variable by using the rejection method with \(g\) being an exponential density with rate \(\lambda / n\). (a) Show that the average number of iterations of the algorithm needed to generate a gamma is \(n^{n} e^{1-n} /(n-1) !\) (b) Use Stirling's approximation to show that for large \(n\) the answer to part (a) is approximately equal to \(e[(n-1) /(2 \pi)]^{1 / 2}\) (c) Show that the procedure is equivalent to the following: Step 1: Generate \(Y_{1}\) and \(Y_{2}\), independent exponentials with rate \(1 .\) Step 2: If \(Y_{1}<(n-1)\left[Y_{2}-\log \left(Y_{2}\right)-1\right]\), return to step 1 . Step 3: \(\quad\) Set \(X=n Y_{2} / \lambda\) (d) Explain how to obtain an independent exponential along with a gamma from the preceding algorithm.

Set up the alias method for simulating from a binomial random variable with parameters \(n=6, p=0.4\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free