Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the following algorithm for generating a random permutation of the elements \(1,2, \ldots, n .\) In this algorithm, \(P(i)\) can be interpreted as the element in position \(i\) Step 1: \(\quad\) Set \(k=1\). Step 2: \(\quad\) Set \(P(1)=1\). Step 3: If \(k=n\), stop. Otherwise, let \(k=k+1\). Step 4: Generate a random number \(U\), and let $$ \begin{aligned} P(k) &=P([k U]+1), \\ P([k U]+1) &=k . \end{aligned} $$ Go to step 3 . (a) Explain in words what the algorithm is doing. (b) Show that at iteration \(k\) -that is, when the value of \(P(k)\) is initially set-that \(P(1), P(2), \ldots, P(k)\) is a random permutation of \(1,2, \ldots, k\). Hint: Use induction and argue that $$ \begin{aligned} &P_{k}\left\\{i_{1}, i_{2}, \ldots, i_{j-1}, k, i_{j}, \ldots, i_{k-2}, i\right\\} \\ &\quad=P_{k-1}\left\\{i_{1}, i_{2}, \ldots, i_{j-1}, i, i_{j}, \ldots, i_{k-2}\right\\} \frac{1}{k} \end{aligned} $$ \(=\frac{1}{k !}\) by the induction hypothesis The preceding algorithm can be used even if \(n\) is not initially known.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) The algorithm generates a random permutation of elements from 1 to n by iteratively swapping elements and their positions based on a random number U. The procedure continues until all elements have been permuted. (b) By using induction, we proved that at iteration k, the set \(P(1), P(2), \ldots, P(k)\) is a random permutation of elements from 1 to k. The base case (k=1) holds true, and for the inductive step (k+1), assuming the induction hypothesis, it is also true as the multiplicative factor \(\frac{1}{(k+1)!}\) is introduced by the random number U.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a): Explanation of the algorithm

The algorithm provided consists of the following steps: 1. Set the initial value of k to 1. 2. Initialize the first position in P with 1 (i.e., P(1) = 1). 3. If k equals n, the process has reached the end and the algorithm terminates. Otherwise, increase k by 1. 4. Generate a random number U, and use it to generate the next element and its position in the sequence: \(P(k) = P(\lfloor kU \rfloor + 1)\) and \(P(\lfloor kU \rfloor + 1) = k\) Then return to Step 3. This algorithm generates a random permutation of the elements from 1 to n. At each iteration, it generates a random number U to determine the position where the current value of k will be placed and swaps the elements at positions k and the chosen position. The algorithm iterates until the entire sequence is generated, terminating when k equals n.
02

Part (b): Proving random permutation correctness

In order to show that at iteration k, the set \(P(1), P(2), \ldots, P(k)\) is a random permutation of elements \(1,2,\ldots,k\), we will use induction. Inductive hypothesis: For iteration k, we will assume that \(P_{k}\{i_{1}, i_{2}, \ldots, i_{j-1}, k, i_{j}, \ldots, i_{k-2}, i\} = P_{k-1}\{i_{1}, i_{2}, \ldots, i_{j-1}, i, i_{j}, \ldots, i_{k-2}\} \frac{1}{k}\), which equals \(\frac{1}{k!}\) by the induction hypothesis. Base case: For k=1, P(1) = 1. There is only one permutation for the elements 1 to 1, so it holds true that \(\frac{1}{1!} = 1\). Inductive step: Let's consider the iteration k+1. We must show that \(P_{k+1}\{i_1, i_2, \ldots, i_j-1,k+1,i_j,\ldots,i_{k-1}, i\} = P_{k}\{i_{1}, i_{2}, \ldots, i_{j-1}, k, i_{j}, \ldots, i_{k-2}, i\} \frac{1}{k+1}\), which equals to \(\frac{1}{(k+1)!}\). For this step, we generate a random number U, and use it to determine the position and element of \(P(k+1)\): \(P(k+1) = P(\lfloor (k+1)U \rfloor + 1)\) and \(P(\lfloor (k+1)U \rfloor + 1) = k+1\) This will result in one of the \((k+1)\) positions for the element k+1 randomly with equal probability \(\frac{1}{k+1}\), giving us a set \(\left\{1, 2, \ldots, k, k+1 \right\}\) at iteration k+1. Now, by the inductive hypothesis, we have \(P_{k}\{i_{1}, i_{2}, \ldots, i_{j-1}, k, i_{j}, \ldots, i_{k-2}, i\} = \frac{1}{k!}\). Multiplying both sides with \(\frac{1}{k+1}\), we have: \(P_{k}\{i_{1}, i_{2}, \ldots, i_{j-1}, k, i_{j}, \ldots, i_{k-2}, i\} \frac{1}{k+1} = \frac{1}{(k+1)!}\) Thus, by induction, the algorithm generates a random permutation of the elements 1 to n, and at iteration k, the set \(P(1), P(2), \ldots, P(k)\) permutes the elements \(1, 2, \ldots, k\) randomly.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If \(U_{1}, U_{2}, U_{3}\) are independent uniform \((0,1)\) random variables, find \(P\left(\prod_{i=1}^{3} U_{i}>0.1\right)\) Hint: Relate the desired probability to one about a Poisson process.

Consider the technique of simulating a gamma \((n, \lambda)\) random variable by using the rejection method with \(g\) being an exponential density with rate \(\lambda / n\). (a) Show that the average number of iterations of the algorithm needed to generate a gamma is \(n^{n} e^{1-n} /(n-1) !\) (b) Use Stirling's approximation to show that for large \(n\) the answer to part (a) is approximately equal to \(e[(n-1) /(2 \pi)]^{1 / 2}\) (c) Show that the procedure is equivalent to the following: Step 1: Generate \(Y_{1}\) and \(Y_{2}\), independent exponentials with rate \(1 .\) Step 2: If \(Y_{1}<(n-1)\left[Y_{2}-\log \left(Y_{2}\right)-1\right]\), return to step 1 . Step 3: \(\quad\) Set \(X=n Y_{2} / \lambda\) (d) Explain how to obtain an independent exponential along with a gamma from the preceding algorithm.

Suppose it is relatively easy to simulate from the distributions \(F_{i}, i=1,2, \ldots, n .\) If \(n\) is small, how can we simulate from $$ F(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{n} P_{i} F_{i}(x), \quad P_{i} \geqslant 0, \quad \sum_{i} P_{i}=1 ? $$ Give a method for simulating from $$ F(x)=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll} \frac{1-e^{-2 x}+2 x}{3}, & 0

Give an efficient method for simulating a nonhomogeneous Poisson process with intensity function $$ \lambda(t)=b+\frac{1}{t+a}, \quad t \geqslant 0 $$

If \(f\) is the density function of a normal random variable with mean \(\mu\) and variance \(\sigma^{2}\), show that the tilted density \(f_{t}\) is the density of a normal random variable with mean \(\mu+\sigma^{2} t\) and variance \(\sigma^{2}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free