Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The Discrete Hazard Rate Method: Let \(X\) denote a nonnegative integer valued random variable. The function \(\lambda(n)=P\\{X=n \mid X \geqslant n\\}, n \geqslant 0\), is called the discrete hazard rate function. (a) Show that \(P\\{X=n\\}=\lambda(n) \prod_{i=0}^{n-1}(1-\lambda(i))\) (b) Show that we can simulate \(X\) by generating random numbers \(U_{1}, U_{2}, \ldots\) stopping at $$ X=\min \left\\{n: U_{n} \leqslant \lambda(n)\right\\} $$ (c) Apply this method to simulating a geometric random variable. Explain, intuitively, why it works. (d) Suppose that \(\lambda(n) \leqslant p<1\) for all \(n\). Consider the following algorithm for simulating \(X\) and explain why it works: Simulate \(X_{i}, U_{i}, i \geqslant 1\) where \(X_{i}\) is geometric with mean \(1 / p\) and \(U_{i}\) is a random number. Set \(S_{k}=X_{1}+\cdots+X_{k}\) and let $$ X=\min \left\\{S_{k}: U_{k} \leqslant \lambda\left(S_{k}\right) / p\right\\} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
In this exercise, we analyzed the discrete hazard rate function, \(\lambda(n)\), and its properties for a nonnegative integer-valued random variable \(X\). We proved that \(P\{X=n\}=\lambda(n) \prod_{i=0}^{n-1}(1-\lambda(i))\). We then showed that we can simulate \(X\) using random numbers and the hazard rate function, and applied this method to simulating a geometric random variable. Finally, we analyzed an algorithm for simulating \(X\) under the condition that \(\lambda(n) \leq p < 1\) for all n. The algorithm works by efficiently simulating the effect of the hazard rate function on the random variable \(X\), ensuring that generated samples follow the desired distribution.

Step by step solution

01

Derive P(X = n) formula

We know that, \(\lambda(n)=P\{X=n \mid X \geqslant n\}\). So we can write, \[P\{X=n\} = \lambda(n) \cdot P\{X \geqslant n\}.\] Using the fact that \(P\{X \geqslant n\} = 1 - P\{X < n\}\), we can say, \[P\{X=n\} = \lambda(n) \cdot (1 - P\{X < n\}).\] Now, \(P\{X < n\} = \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} P\{X = i\}\), so the above equation becomes, \[P\{X=n\} = \lambda(n) \cdot \left(1 - \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} P\{X = i\}\right).\] Finally, we can use the fact that \(P\{X=i\} = \lambda(i) \prod_{j=0}^{i-1} (1-\lambda(j))\), so the above equation becomes, \[P\{X=n\} = \lambda(n) \cdot \left(1 - \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} \lambda(i) \prod_{j=0}^{i-1} (1-\lambda(j))\right).\] Now, we have our desired result: \[P\{X=n\}=\lambda(n) \prod_{i=0}^{n-1}(1-\lambda(i)).\] #Part b: Simulating X using random numbers# Next, we are asked to show that we can simulate \(X\) by generating random numbers \(U_{1}, U_{2},\ldots\) stopping at, \[X=\min \{n: U_{n} \leqslant \lambda(n)\}.\]
02

Condition for stopping

Since \(\lambda(n) = P\{X=n \mid X \geqslant n\}\), we get that, \[P\{U_{n} \leqslant \lambda(n) \mid X \geq n \} = \lambda(n).\] Now, notice that for a given \(n\), the event \(\{U_{n} \leq \lambda(n)\}\) is independent of the event \(\{X \geq n\}\). Hence, \[P\{U_{n} \leq \lambda(n), X \geq n\} = P\{U_{n} \leq \lambda(n)\} \cdot P\{X \geq n\}.\] Since we want \(X = n\) to be the stopping condition, we need these probabilities to be equal, which means: \[P\{X = n\} = \lambda(n) \cdot P\{X \geq n\}.\] So, this simulation will always generate values that follow the distribution of the random variable \(X\). Hence, our simulation is legitimate. #Part c: Applying the method to geometric random variables# Now, we apply the method from part b to simulate a geometric random variable.
03

Geometric random variable definition

A geometric random variable \(X\) is defined as the number of trials before the first success, where the probability of success is \(p\). The probability mass function (PMF) is given by: \[P\{X=n\}=(1-p)^{n-1}p,\] where \(n = 1, 2, \ldots\).
04

Discrete hazard rate function for geometric random variable

First, we find the discrete hazard rate function for the geometric random variable. Since \(\lambda(n) = P\{X=n \mid X \geqslant n\}\), we get \[\lambda(n)=\frac{P\{X=n\}}{P\{X \geqslant n\}} = \frac{(1-p)^{n-1}p}{1 - (1-p)^n}.\]
05

Simulating a geometric random variable with hazard rate function

To simulate the geometric random variable using the hazard rate function, we generate random numbers \(U_{1}, U_{2}, \ldots\), and stop when \[X = \min \left\{n: U_{n} \leq \lambda(n)\right\}.\] The hazard rate function for the geometric random variable represents the probability of success at each trial, considering that previous trials have failed. This is why the method from part b works for simulating a geometric random variable. We are essentially generating random numbers to simulate the trials, and our stopping rule is based on the hazard rate, which captures the notion of the first success happening at a particular trial. #Part d: Algorithm for simulating X with constraints# In this part, we need to analyze an algorithm for simulating \(X\) under the condition that \(\lambda(n) \leq p < 1\) for all \(n\). The algorithm is as follows: Simulate \(X_{i}, U_{i}, i \geq 1\) where \(X_{i}\) is geometric with mean \(1 / p\) and \(U_{i}\) is a random number. Set \(S_{k}=X_{1}+\cdots+X_{k}\) and let \[X=\min \left\{S_{k}: U_{k} \leq \lambda\left(S_{k}\right) / p\right\}.\]
06

Understand the algorithm

Since \(\lambda(n) \leq p\), we can think of distributing the hazard rate across geometric random variables, each with mean \(1/p\). As each \(X_i\) is geometric with mean \(1/p\), the sum of the first k of these random variables (\(S_k\)) will be a multiple of \(\frac{1}{p}\). Now, when we find the minimum \(k\) such that \(U_{k} \leq \lambda\left(S_{k}\right) / p\), we are checking if \((U_{k},S_{k})\) is under the hazard rate function. The first time this condition is met, we are meeting the criteria for simulating the random variable \(X\) with a discrete hazard rate function.
07

Why the algorithm works

The algorithm works because by considering \(S_k\) as the sum of \(k\) geometric random variables, we are capturing the cumulative hazard rate function that characterizes our original random variable \(X\). In addition, using the ratio \(\lambda\left(S_{k}\right) / p\) to decide when to stop the simulation ensures that the generated random variable adheres to the constraints (\(\lambda(n) \leq p\)) specified in the problem. In conclusion, the algorithm works because it efficiently simulates the effect of the hazard rate function on the random variable \(X\), ensuring that generated samples follow the desired distribution.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{k}\) be independent with $$ P\left\\{X_{i}=j\right\\}=\frac{1}{n}, \quad j=1, \ldots, n, i=1, \ldots, k $$ If \(D\) is thê number of distinct values among \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{k}\) show that $$ \begin{aligned} E[D] &=n\left[1-\left(\frac{n-1}{n}\right)^{k}\right] \\ & \approx k-\frac{k^{2}}{2 n} \quad \text { when } \frac{k^{2}}{n} \text { is small } \end{aligned} $$

Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be independent exponential random variables each having rate 1 . Set $$ \begin{aligned} &W_{1}=X_{1} / n \\ &W_{i}=W_{i-1}+\frac{X_{i}}{n-i+1}, \quad i=2, \ldots, n \end{aligned} $$ Explain why \(W_{1}, \ldots, W_{n}\) has the same joint distribution as the order statistics of a sample of \(n\) exponentials each having rate 1 .

Show that if \(X\) and \(Y\) have the same distribution then $$ \operatorname{Var}((X+Y) / 2) \leqslant \operatorname{Var}(X) $$ Hence, conclude that the use of antithetic variables can never increase variance (though it need not be as efficient as generating an independent set of random numbers).

Suppose we want to simulate a large number \(n\) of independent exponentials with rate \(1-\) call them \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots, X_{n} .\) If we were to employ the inverse transform technique we would require one logarithmic computation for each exponential generated. One way to avoid this is to first simulate \(S_{n}\), a gamma random variable with parameters \((n, 1)\) (say, by the method of Section 11.3.3). Now interpret \(S_{n}\) as the time of the \(n\) th event of a Poisson process with rate 1 and use the result that given \(S_{n}\) the set of the first \(n-1\) event times is distributed as the set of \(n-1\) independent uniform \(\left(0, S_{n}\right)\) random variables. Based on this, explain why the following algorithm simulates \(n\) independent exponentials: Step 1: Generate \(S_{n}\), a gamma random variable with parameters \((n, 1)\). Step 2: Generate \(n-1\) random numbers \(U_{1}, U_{2}, \ldots, U_{n-1}\). Step 3: Order the \(U_{i}, i=1, \ldots, n-1\) to obtain \(U_{(1)}

If \(f\) is the density function of a normal random variable with mean \(\mu\) and variance \(\sigma^{2}\), show that the tilted density \(f_{t}\) is the density of a normal random variable with mean \(\mu+\sigma^{2} t\) and variance \(\sigma^{2}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free