Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Prove that a function \(f\) defined on a closed interval [a, \(b]\) is p-measurable if and only if, given any \(\varepsilon>0\), there is a continuous function \(\varphi\) on \([a, b]\) such that \(\mu\\{x: f(x) \neq \varphi(x)\\}<\mathrm{E}\) Hint. Use Egorov's theorem. Comment. This result, known as Luzin's theorem, shows that a measurable function "can be made continuous by altering it on a set of arbitrarily small measure."

Short Answer

Expert verified
A function is \( p \)-measurable if it can be approximated by continuous functions on a set of small measure, as shown by Egorov's and Luzin's Theorem.

Step by step solution

01

Define Measurable Function

A function \( f \) is \( p \)-measurable on the interval \([a, b] \) if for every \( \varepsilon > 0 \), there exists a continuous function \( \varphi \) such that the measure of the set where \( f(x) eq \varphi(x) \) is less than \( \varepsilon \).
02

Assume f is p-measurable

Assume \( f \) is \( p \)-measurable. Therefore, for a given \( \varepsilon > 0 \), there exists a continuous function \( \varphi(x) \) satisfying the condition: \( \mu\{x : f(x) eq \varphi(x)\} < \varepsilon \). This is by definition.
03

Apply Egorov's Theorem

Egorov's Theorem states that for a sequence of measurable functions converging pointwise, convergence can be uniform outside a set of arbitrarily small measure. Use this theorem to show that \( f \) converges to a continuous function \( \varphi(x) \) on \([a,b] \), apart from a set of small measure.
04

Construct Continuous Function

Using the uniform convergence from Egorov's Theorem, construct the continuous function \( \varphi(x) \) such that \( f(x) \) and \( \varphi(x) \) are equal on most of \([a, b] \), except on a set with measure less than \( \varepsilon \).
05

Conclude from Definition

Since \( f(x) \) can be approximated by \( \varphi(x) \) where \( \mu(\{x : f(x) eq \varphi(x)\}) < \varepsilon \), it verifies the definition of \( p \)-measurability from Step 1.
06

Prove Converse

Assume there exists a continuous \( \varphi(x) \) such that \( \mu\{x : f(x) eq \varphi(x)\} < \varepsilon \). By Egorov's Theorem and since \( \varphi(x) \) is continuous, \( f(x) \) can be altered on a set of small measure to be continuous, proving \( f \) is \( p \)-measurable.
07

Summarize Implication

The results conclude that \( f \) is \( p \)-measurable if and only if it can be uniformly approximated by a continuous function except on a small measure set, establishing \( f \)'s \( p \)-measurability by Luzin's theorem.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Measurable Functions
Measurable functions are central to modern analysis. If you have a function, say \( f(x) \), defined on some interval, let's call it \([a, b]\), that function is considered measurable if it aligns well with certain 'nice' sets. Why is this important? Because measurable functions allow integration and rigorous analysis in mathematical contexts.
When we say a function is \( p \)-measurable, we mean that for any small error \( \varepsilon > 0 \), you can find another function that is continuous and very close to \( f(x) \). The distance between these functions is described using a measure, which essentially tells us how 'big' the set of points is where these functions differ.
This is a neat property because it essentially ensures any measurable function can be approximated by something smoother or more manageable, namely continuous functions. This helps broaden our toolkit in analysis by bridging complex functions with more intuitive continuous ones.
Continuous Functions
Continuous functions are those that have no jumps or breaks. Imagine a smooth and unbroken curve on the graph—this is what a continuous function looks like. Continuity is crucial in analysis because it allows for predictability in function behavior.
  • Continuous functions possess the 'Intermediate Value Property,' meaning for any two end points, \( f(a) \) and \( f(b) \), the function takes every possible value between these two points.
  • They're vital in calculus, as they guarantee the existence of derivatives and integrals under certain conditions.
  • Furthermore, continuous functions over closed intervals are always bounded and attain their minimum and maximum values, which is incredibly useful in optimization problems.

The connection between continuous and measurable functions is established through the ability of measurable functions to be closely approximated by continuous ones over most of their domain, except for small, negligible sets. This approximation yields significant insights and practical applications, particularly in the fields of real and complex analysis.
Egorov's Theorem
Egorov's Theorem is a powerful tool in analysis and provides a bridge between pointwise convergence and uniform convergence. If you're working with a sequence of measurable functions that converge to some limit function, Egorov's Theorem tells us that this convergence can be uniform, except for a small set of measure less than some arbitrarily small \( \varepsilon \).
This is quite important because pointwise convergence, where each function in a sequence approaches a limiting function at each point, can be rather erratic. However, uniform convergence provides much nicer properties, such as the preservation of continuity.
The concept of negligible sets is pivotal here. According to the theorem, you can identify a set such that outside of this tiny set, your sequence behaves much more predictably and uniformly.
  • Egorov's Theorem gives us great flexibility because we can handle complex sequences while controlling the measure of the set where convergence doesn't behave as nicely.
  • This theorem becomes particularly useful in proving Luzin's Theorem, ensuring that a measurable function can be approximated by continuous ones.
  • It's an essential result not only in theoretical aspects but also in practical scenarios dealing with function approximation and analysis.

Understanding Egorov's Theorem reveals much about the behavior of functions in advanced mathematics, granting a deeper grasp of how convergence concepts are interrelated.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(\left\\{f_{n}\right\\}\) be a sequence of measurable functions converging almost everywhere to a functionf. Prove that \(\left\\{f_{n}\right\\}\) converges almost everywhere to a function \(g\) if and only if \(f\) and \(g\) are equivalent.

Prove that the Dirichlet function $$ f(x)= \begin{cases}1 & \text { if } \mathrm{x} \text { is rational } \\ 0 & \text { if } x \text { is irrational }\end{cases} $$ is measurable on every interval \([a, b]\).

Prove that iff is measurable, then so is \(|f|\).

Prove that if a sequence \(\left\\{f_{n}\right\\}\) of functions converges to \(\mathbf{f}\) in measure, then it contains a subsequence \(\left\\{f_{n_{k}}\right\\}\) converging to \(\mathbf{f}\) almost everywhere. Hint. Let \(\left\\{\delta_{n}\right\\}\) be a sequence of positive numbers such that $$ \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \delta_{n}=0 $$ and let \(\left\\{\varepsilon_{n}\right\\}\) be a sequence of positive numbers such that $$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \varepsilon_{n}<\infty $$ Let \\{n) be a sequence of positive integers such that \(\mathrm{n}\), \(>n_{k-1}\) and $$ \mu\left\\{x:\left|f_{n_{k}}(x)-f(x)\right|>\delta_{k}\right\\}<\varepsilon_{k} \quad(k=1,2, \ldots) $$ Moreover, let $$ R_{i}=\bigcup_{k=f}^{\infty}\left\\{x:\left|f_{n_{k}}(x)-f(x)\right|>\delta_{k}\right\\}, \quad Q=\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty} R_{i} $$ Then \(\mu\left(R_{i}\right) \rightarrow \mu(Q)\) as \(\mathbf{i} \rightarrow \infty\), since \(R_{1} \supset R_{2} \supset \cdot \ldots\) On the other hand, $$ \mu\left(R_{i}\right)<\sum_{k=1}^{m} \varepsilon_{k} $$ and hence \(\mu\left(R_{i}\right) \rightarrow 0\), so that \(\mu(Q)=0\). Now show that \(\left\\{f_{n_{n}}\right\\}\) converges to \(f\) on \(E-Q .\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free