Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(E\) be a topological linear space. Prove that a) If Uand Vare open sets, then so is \(U+V=\\{z: z=x+y, x \in U\), \(y \in V\\}\) b) If \(U\) is open, then so is \(\alpha U=\\{z: z=\mathrm{ax}, \mathrm{x} \in U\\}\) provided that \(\mathrm{a} \neq 0\) c) If \(F \subset E\) is closed, then so is \(\alpha F\) for arbitrary a.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) \(U+V\) is open; b) \(\alpha U\) is open for \(\alpha \neq 0\); c) \(\alpha F\) is closed.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Sum of Open Sets

To show that the sum of two open sets \(U\) and \(V\) in a topological linear space \(E\) is open, we need to consider arbitrary points \(x \in U\) and \(y \in V\). We want to show that any point \(z = x + y\) in \(U + V\) has a neighborhood entirely contained within \(U + V\).
02

Use the Openness Property of Topological Spaces

Since \(U\) and \(V\) are open, there exist open neighborhoods \(U_x \subset U\) and \(V_y \subset V\) around \(x\) and \(y\) respectively. The sum \(U_x + V_y\) is then an open neighborhood of \(z = x + y\) and is a subset of \(U + V\), showing \(U + V\) is open.
03

Define Scaling of an Open Set

To demonstrate that \(\alpha U\) is open when \(U\) is open and \(\alpha eq 0\), consider any element \(z = \alpha x\) in \(\alpha U\), where \(x \in U\). We need to find a neighborhood of \(z\) entirely contained within \(\alpha U\).
04

Use Algebraic Properties of Topology

Since \(U\) is open and contains \(x\), there exists an open neighborhood \(U_x\) around \(x\). Then the set \(\alpha U_x\) forms an open neighborhood of \(z = \alpha x\) and is a subset of \(\alpha U\), proving \(\alpha U\) is open.
05

Define Scaling of a Closed Set

For a closed set \(F\) in \(E\), we need to show that \(\alpha F\) is closed when \(\alpha\) is any scalar. Recall that the image of a closed set under a continuous function is closed.
06

Use Continuity and Linear Properties

The map \(x \mapsto \alpha x\) is continuous for any scalar \(\alpha\). Thus, the image of a closed set \(F\) under this mapping, \(\alpha F\), is also closed, proving the statement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Open Sets in Topological Spaces
An open set in a topological linear space is a foundational concept in topology. Simply put, a set is open if for every point within the set, there exists a neighborhood completely contained in that set.
This means that no matter where you look in the set, you can find a small surrounding area (a neighborhood) that doesn't stray outside the set.

When exploring open sets in mathematical contexts, particularly in a topological linear space, we encounter interesting properties.
For example, the sum of two open sets is still open. Imagine you have two open sets, say a circle and a square, within a space.
  • The addition of these two sets involves combining all possible sums of their elements.
    The resultant set still shares this openness because any point in this new sum can find itself surrounded by a neighborhood within the sum of the sets, ensuring the entire set remains open.
Exploring Closed Sets
Closed sets are essentially the complement of open sets. In a given topological space, a set is closed if its complement is open.
A closed set includes its boundary points and is robust under limit operations - meaning that any limit of a sequence of points in a closed set must also be in that set.

Consider what happens when you scale a closed set by multiplying all its points by a scalar number, whether positive or negative.
  • Interestingly, this process of scaling doesn't affect the closed nature of the set.
    This is because the function of scaling is continuous in topology, and the image of a closed set under a continuous function is also closed.
    So, even if you multiply the set by any number, it retains its original closed properties.
The Concept of a Neighborhood
In the language of topology, a neighborhood refers to a "bubble" of space surrounding a particular point.
It's not just an isolated point, but rather a collection of points that cluster closely around it.

When we say a point is in the neighborhood, it implies that within a certain radius around this point, all other points belong to the same set.
  • Neighborhoods are crucial for understanding open sets because a set is open if for every point, you can find such a neighborhood.
    These localized collections help us decipher whether a point can access its nearby neighbors without stepping outside the confines of the set.
Talking about these neighborhoods lets us dive deeper into analyzing the properties of sets in topological spaces, offering insights into complex mathematical relationships.
Scaling of Sets in Topological Spaces
Scaling of sets is an intriguing operation in a topological space, particularly when dealing with both open and closed sets.
It involves multiplying all elements of a set by a constant scalar, which geometrically stretches or shrinks the set.

When we focus on open sets:
  • If you scale an open set by a nonzero constant, it remains open.
    That's because you can continuously stretch or shrink the space without altering the essential property that makes it open.
    Every point within the scaled set will have its neighborhood that still fits entirely in the scaled set.
On the other hand, when scaling a closed set:
  • The result is a closed set under any scalar multiplication.
    This can be attributed to the continuous nature of scaling transformations, which keep the closed property intact.
    Whether you magnify or condense the set, its characteristic as a closed set persists.
These properties highlight the dynamic interactions within topological spaces, making scaling a powerful tool to understand and visualize transformations within these mathematical structures.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Prove that the topology in a countably normed space can be specified in terms of the metric $$ \rho(x, y)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2^{n}} \frac{\|x-y\|_{n}}{1+\|x-y\|_{n}} \quad(x, y \in E) $$ First verify that \(\rho(x, y)\) has all the properties of a metric, and is invariant under shifts in the sense that \(\rho(x+z, y+z)=\rho(x, y)\) for all \(x, y, z \in E\). Comment. A countably normed space is said to be complete if it is complete with respect to the metric (3).

Problem 14. Prove that every countably normed space satisfies the first axiom of countability. Hint. Replace the system of neighborhoods \(U_{r, \varepsilon}\) by the subsystem such that \(E\) takes only the values $$ 1, \frac{1}{2}, \ldots, \frac{1}{n}, \ldots $$ (this can be done without changing the topology). Comment. Thus the topology in E can be described in terms of convergent sequences (recall Sec. 9.4).

Two norms \(\|\cdot\|_{1}\) and \(\|\cdot\|\), in a linear space \(\mathrm{E}\) are said to be compatible if, whenever a sequence \(\\{x\), in \(E\) is fundamental with respect to both norms and converges to a limit \(\mathrm{x} \in \mathrm{E}\) with respect to one of them, it also converges to the same limit \(\mathrm{x}\) with respect to the other norm. A linear space E equipped with a countable system of compatible norms \(\|\cdot\|_{n}\) is said to be countably normed. Prove that every countably normed linear space becomes a topological linear space when equipped with the topology generated by the neighborhood base consisting of all sets of the form $$ U_{r, \varepsilon}=\left\\{x: x \in E,\|x\|_{1}<\varepsilon, \ldots,\|x\|_{r}<\varepsilon\right\\} $$ for some number \(\varepsilon>0\) and positive integer \(\mathrm{r}\).

Prove that a topological linear space \(\mathrm{E}\) automatically has the following separation property: Given any point \(x \in E\) and any neighborhood \(U\) of \(\mathrm{x}\), there is another neighborhood \(\mathrm{V}\) of \(\mathrm{x}\) such that \([\mathrm{V}] \subset U\). Hint. If \(U\) is a neighborhood of zero, then, by the continuity of subtraction, there is a neighborhood \(\mathrm{V}\) of zero such that \(=\) $$ V-V=\\{z: z=x-y, x \in V, y \in V\\} \subset U $$ Suppose \(y \in[V]\). Then every neighborhood of \(y\), in particular \(V+y\), contains a point of \(V\). Hence there is a point \(z \in V\) such that \(z+y \in \mathrm{V}\). It follows that \(\mathrm{y} \in \mathrm{V}-\mathrm{V} \subset U\)

Prove that a topological linear space is a \(T_{1}\)-space if and only if the intersection of all neighborhoods of zero contains no nonzero elements.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free