Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The authors of the paper "Short-Term Health and Economic Benefits of Smoking Cessation: Low Birth Weight" (Pediatrics [1999]: \(1312-1320\) ) investigated the medical cost associated with babies born to mothers who smoke. The paper included estimates of mean medical cost for low-birth-weight babies for different ethnic groups. For a sample of 654 Hispanic low-birth- weight babies, the mean medical cost was \(\$ 55,007\) and the standard error \((s / \sqrt{n})\) was \(\$ 3011 .\) For a sample of 13 Native American low-birth- weight babies, the mean and standard error were \(\$ 73,418\) and \(\$ 29,577\), respectively. Explain why the two standard errors are so different.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The standard errors for the samples of Hispanic and Native American low-birth-weight babies are so different due to the impact of sample size and data dispersion on standard error calculations. The larger sample size and potentially less dispersion in the Hispanic babies sample led to smaller standard error, while the smaller sample size and potentially more dispersed data in the Native American babies sample resulted in a larger standard error.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Standard Error

The standard error is a measure of the statistical accuracy of an estimate, equal to the standard deviation of the theoretical distribution of a large population of such estimates. It is usually calculated by the formula: \(SE = s / \sqrt{n}\), where 's' is the approximation of the population standard deviation (sample standard deviation) and 'n' is the sample size.
02

Analyzing the Hispanic Sample

For the sample of 654 Hispanic low-birth-weight babies, the mean medical cost was \$55007 and the standard error was \$3011. The large sample size would contribute to a smaller standard error, assuming the data distribution is not widely dispersed.
03

Analyzing the Native American Sample

In contrast, for the sample of 13 Native American low-birth-weight babies, the mean and standard error were \$73418 and \$29577, respectively. The relatively small sample size would result in a larger standard error as standard error is inversely proportional to the square root of the sample size. In addition, a high standard error relative to the mean could indicate a wider distribution of the data.
04

Comparing the Two Samples

Comparing the standard errors for the two samples, it is clear that the sample size impacts the standard error calculations significantly. Small sample size and possibly a wide dispersion of costs in the case of the Native American babies led to a larger standard error, while the larger sample size and more clustered distribution resulted in a smaller standard error for the Hispanic babies.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Accuracy
Statistical accuracy refers to how closely a sample statistic estimates the true population parameter. In the context of the provided exercise, the statistic in question is the mean medical cost for low-birth-weight babies belonging to different ethnic groups. The standard error (SE) is intimately connected to statistical accuracy since it provides a measure of the variability of the sample mean around the population mean.

Mathematically, the standard error is computed using the formula: \( SE = \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} \), where \(s\) is the sample standard deviation, and \(n\) is the sample size. A lower standard error indicates a more precise estimate of the population mean, suggesting that the sample mean is a more reliable indicator of the true population mean. In the exercise, the standard error helps understand the precision of the mean medical costs estimated for the two samples. The smaller standard error for the Hispanic sample compared to the Native American sample suggests that the estimate for the Hispanic babies' medical costs is statistically more accurate.
Sample Size Effect
The impact of sample size on statistical inference cannot be overstated, and it is highlighted in the exercise as a key factor contributing to the difference in standard errors between the two samples. The formula for standard error incorporates the sample size in the denominator, \( SE = \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} \), which means that as the sample size increases, the standard error decreases. This relationship implies that the larger the sample, the closer our sample mean is likely to be to the true population mean.

In the provided calculations, the comparatively large sample of 654 Hispanic babies results in a smaller standard error, enhancing the statistical accuracy of the mean medical cost estimate. Conversely, the small sample of 13 Native American babies leads to a much larger standard error, indicating less confidence in the precision of the mean estimate for that group. It is crucial for students to understand that increasing the sample size is one of the most direct methods to improve the precision of sample estimates and reduce statistical error.
Data Distribution
The distribution of data in a sample influences the calculation of standard error and the interpretation of statistical results. Standard error assumes that the data points are distributed in a particular manner, typically along a bell-shaped curve known as the normal distribution for many biological and social phenomena. The degree to which the data is spread out affects the standard deviation, and consequently, the standard error.

A wide spread in data, indicating higher variability, will result in a larger standard deviation and thus a larger standard error. Conversely, if the data points are clustered closely around the mean, this suggests less variability, leading to a smaller standard deviation and a smaller standard error. In the exercise, we're hinted that the Native American low-birth-weight babies' data might be more widely dispersed than the Hispanic babies' data, which could partially explain the larger standard error despite the substantial influence of the small sample size. Understanding the shape and spread of the data distribution helps in comprehending the variation within a sample and the reliability of the sample mean as an estimate of the population mean.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Fat contents (in percentage) for 10 randomly selected hot dogs were given in the article "Sensory and Mechanical Assessment of the Quality of Frankfurters" (Journal of Texture Studies \([1990]: 395-409\) ). Use the following data to construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the true mean fat percentage of hot dogs: \(\begin{array}{lllllllllllll}25.2 & 21.3 & 22.8 & 17.0 & 29.8 & 21.0 & 25.5 & 16.0 & 20.9 & 19.5\end{array}\)

A study reported in Newsweek (December 23, 1991) involved a sample of 935 smokers. Each individual received a nicotine patch, which delivers nicotine to the bloodstream but at a much slower rate than cigarettes do. Dosage was decreased to 0 over a 12-week period. Suppose that 245 of the subjects were still not smoking 6 months after treatment (this figure is consistent with information given in the article). Estimate the percentage of all smokers who, when given this treatment, would refrain from smoking for at least 6 months.

The Center for Urban Transportation Research released a report stating that the average commuting distance in the United States is \(10.9 \mathrm{mi}\) (USA Today, August 13 , 1991). Suppose that this average is actually the mean of a random sample of 300 commuters and that the sample standard deviation is \(6.2 \mathrm{mi}\). Estimate the true mean commuting distance using a \(99 \%\) confidence interval.

The article "Consumers Show Increased Liking for Diesel Autos" (USA Today, January 29,2003 ) reported that \(27 \%\) of U.S. consumers would opt for a diesel car if it ran as cleanly and performed as well as a car with a gas engine. Suppose that you suspect that the proportion might be different in your area and that you want to conduct a survey to estimate this proportion for the adult residents of your city. What is the required sample size if you want to estimate this proportion to within \(.05\) with \(95 \%\) confidence? Compute the required sample size first using 27 as a preliminary estimate of \(\pi\) and then using the conservative value of \(.5 .\) How do the two sample sizes compare? What sample size would you recommend for this study?

The interval from \(-2.33\) to \(1.75\) captures an area of \(.95\) under the \(z\) curve. This implies that another largesample \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu\) has lower limit \(\bar{x}-2.33 \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}\) and upper limit \(\bar{x}+1.75 \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}} .\) Would you recommend using this \(95 \%\) interval over the \(95 \%\) interval \(\bar{x} \pm 1.96 \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}\) discussed in the text? Explain. (Hint: Look at the width of each interval.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free